/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 Consider a beam of free particle... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a beam of free particles that move with velocity \(v=p / m\) in the \(x\) -direction and are incident on a potential-energy step \(U(x)=0,\) for \(x<0,\) and \(U(x)=U_{0}0 .\) The wave function for \(x<0\) is \(\psi(x)=A e^{i k_{1} x}+B e^{-i k_{1} x},\) representing incident and reflected particles, and for \(x>0\) is \(\psi(x)=C e^{i k_{2} x},\) representing transmitted particles. Use the conditions that both \(\psi\) and its first derivative must be continuous at \(x=0\) to find the constants \(B\) and \(C\) in terms of \(k_{1}, k_{2},\) and \(A\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The coefficients B and C in terms of \(k_{1}\), \(k_{2}\), and \(A\) are \(B = \frac{(k_{1} - k_{2})}{(k_{1} + k_{2})} A\) and \(C = \frac{2 k_{1}}{(k_{1} + k_{2})} A\) respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Write down wave functions and their derivatives

The wave function for \(x<0\) which represents incident and reflected particles is given by \(\psi(x)=A e^{i k_{1} x}+B e^{-i k_{1} x}\). Taking derivative gives \(\psi'(x)=i k_{1} A e^{i k_{1} x} - i k_{1} B e^{-i k_{1} x}\). For \(x>0\), the wave function representing transmitted particles is \(\psi(x)=C e^{i k_{2} x}\) with its derivative as \(\psi'(x)= i k_{2} C e^{i k_{2} x}\).
02

Apply boundary conditions at \(x = 0\)

For quantum systems, both \(\psi\) and \(\psi'\) must be continuous at the boundary. Since the potential step occurs at \(x=0\), we apply the boundary conditions at \(x=0\). This leads to two equations: For \(\psi(x)\) being continuous, we have: \(A + B = C\), And for \(\psi'(x)\) being continuous, we get: \(i k_{1} A - i k_{1} B = i k_{2} C\).
03

Solve for \(B\) and \(C\)

Due to the two simultaneous equations, it is possible to solve for constants B and C in terms of \(A\), \(k_{1}\) and \(k_{2}\). From the continuity of \(\psi'(x)\), \(C\) can be written as:\(C = \frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} (A - B)\)Substitute this \(\psi(x)\) continuity equation, we get:\(A + B = \frac{k_{1}}{k_{2}} (A - B)\)Solving for \(B\) gives: \(B = \frac{(k_{1} - k_{2})}{(k_{1} + k_{2})} A\)Substitute B into the continuity of \(\psi(x)\), we get:\(A + \frac{(k_{1}-k_{2})}{(k_{1}+k_{2})} A = C\)Solving for \(C\) gives: \(C = \frac{2 k_{1}}{(k_{1} + k_{2})} A\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Potential-Energy Step
In quantum mechanics, the concept of a potential-energy step is essential for understanding how particles behave when they encounter sudden changes in potential energy. If we visualize the situation, think of a flat landscape that suddenly rises or falls – this is akin to the potential-energy step in quantum physics.

A common scenario involves a particle moving in one region with a certain kinetic energy, and then it comes upon a region where the potential energy is different. The step height, denoted by U0, can either be less than or greater than the particle's energy. When the particle's energy is greater than U0, as in the given problem, the particle can continue into the new region but with altered properties, reflected in the wave function's parameters.

This leads us to the need to connect the properties of wave functions on either side of the step to determine how the particle will behave. The clearer we understand this, the better we grasp the fascinating phenomena such as quantum tunneling or reflection, pivotal concepts in quantum mechanics.
Wave Function Continuity
One of the central tenets of quantum mechanics is the continuity of the wave function. Continuity means that the wave function and its first derivative with respect to position do not show any abrupt changes or jumps at any point, including boundaries. For example, when a particle encounters a potential-energy step, its wave function must remain continuous across the step.

To put it simply, if you were drawing the wave function on a graph, you could do so without lifting your pencil at the boundary, despite the potential energy changing there. This requirement comes from the physical properties that the wave function represents, including the probability of finding a particle at a certain position.

This condition of continuity helps us determine the relationships between the coefficients of the wave function on either side of the boundary, just like in the step-by-step solution provided. The continuity equations form the bridge that allows us to relate the behavior of a quantum system before and after encountering a change in potential.
Quantum Wave Functions
Quantum wave functions are mathematical tools that describe the quantum state of a particle or system. They hold the key to understanding everything we want to know about the system's behavior. The wave function, often written as ψ(³æ), combines complex numbers and exponentials to encode information about the amplitude of the wave and, consequently, the probability of finding a particle at a given point.

The beauty and complexity of quantum mechanics come from the wave-like nature of particles. That's why we describe them using wave functions. When you see a wave function with terms like Aeik1x and Be-ik1x, it's representing particles moving to the right and left, respectively, in the context of the problem provided. These coefficients, such as A, B, and C, play a decisive role, as they determine the amplitude and, thus, the probability of detecting particles in different regions.

Mathematically deciphering and physically interpreting wave functions allow us to predict how a system will evolve over time, which is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. The more intuitively we understand these wave functions, the better we can grasp the concepts of quantum superposition and entanglement.
Quantum Mechanical Waves
Quantum mechanical waves are not like the waves you see crashing onto the beach. Instead, they represent the probability of where a particle might be located and how it might behave. These waves are not physical but probabilistic in nature and are described by the aforementioned wave functions.

In our exercise, the 'waves' refer to particles moving as wave-like entities before and after they hit the potential-energy step. Just as the waves in the ocean have peaks and troughs, quantum mechanical waves have areas of high and low amplitude, indicating where a particle is more or less likely to be found.

Quantum mechanical waves are special because they can exhibit interference – where waves combine to enhance or diminish the amplitude – and diffraction, where waves spread out after passing through a narrow opening. These behaviors are rooted in the wave equations and boundary conditions fundamental to quantum mechanics. Understanding the wave-like nature of particles helps explain phenomena such as why electrons can behave both like particles and waves, a phenomenon often referred to as wave-particle duality.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When low-energy electrons pass through an ionized gas, electrons of certain energies pass through the gas as if the gas atoms weren't there and thus have transmission coefficients (tunneling probabilities) \(T\) equal to unity. The gas ions can be modeled approximately as a rectangular barrier. The value of \(T=1\) occurs when an integral or half-integral number of de Broglie wavelengths of the electron as it passes over the barrier equal the width \(L\) of the barrier. You are planning an experiment to measure this effect. To assist you in designing the necessary apparatus, you estimate the electron energies \(E\) that will result in \(T=1\). You assume a barrier height of \(10 \mathrm{eV}\) and a width of \(1.8 \times 10^{-10} \mathrm{~m} .\) Calculate the three lowest values of \(E\) for which \(T=1\)

Consider a potential well defined as \(U(x)=\infty\) for \(x<0, U(x)=0 \quad\) for \(\quad 00\) for \(x>L\) (Fig. \(\mathbf{P 4 0 . 5 8}\) ). Consider a particle with mass \(m\) and kinetic energy \(EL\) be in order to satisfy both the Schrödinger equation and this boundary condition at infinity? (c) Impose the boundary conditions that \(\psi\) and \(d \psi / d x\) are continuous at \(x=L\). Show that the energies of the allowed levels are obtained from solutions of the equation \(k \cot k L=-\kappa,\) where \(k=\sqrt{2 m E} / \hbar\) and \(\kappa=\sqrt{2 m\left(U_{0}-E\right)} / \hbar\)

A particle of mass \(m\) in a one-dimensional box has the following wave function in the region \(x=0\) to \(x=L:\) $$\Psi(x, t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \psi_{1}(x) e^{-i E_{1} t / \hbar}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \psi_{3}(x) e^{-i E_{3} t / \hbar}$$ Here \(\psi_{1}(x)\) and \(\psi_{3}(x)\) are the normalized stationary-state wave functions for the \(n=1\) and \(n=3\) levels, and \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{3}\) are the energies of these levels. The wave function is zero for \(x<0\) and for \(x>L\) (a) Find the value of the probability distribution function at \(x=L / 2\) as a function of time. (b) Find the angular frequency at which the probability distribution function oscillates.

An electron with initial kinetic energy \(6.0 \mathrm{eV}\) encounters a barrier with height \(11.0 \mathrm{eV}\). What is the probability of tunneling if the width of the barrier is (a) \(0.80 \mathrm{nm}\) and (b) \(0.40 \mathrm{nm} ?\)

The WKB Approximation. It can be a challenge to solve the Schrödinger equation for the bound-state energy levels of an arbitrary potential well. An alternative approach that can yield good approximate results for the energy levels is the \(W K B\) approximation (named for the physicists Gregor Wentzel, Hendrik Kramers, and Léon Brillouin, who pioneered its application to quantum mechanics). The WKB approximation begins from three physical statements: (i) According to de Broglie, the magnitude of momentum \(p\) of a quantum-mechanical particle is \(p=h / \lambda\). (ii) The magnitude of momentum is related to the kinetic energy \(K\) by the relationship \(K=p^{2} / 2 m .\) (iii) If there are no nonconservative forces, then in Newtonian mechanics the energy \(E\) for a particle is constant and equal at each point to the sum of the kinetic and potential energies at that point: \(E=K+U(x),\) where \(x\) is the coordinate. (a) Combine these three relationships to show that the wavelength of the particle at a coordinate \(x\) can be written as $$ \lambda(x)=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2 m[E-U(x)]}} $$ Thus we envision a quantum- mechanical particle in a potential well \(U(x)\) as being like a free particle, but with a wavelength \(\lambda(x)\) that is a function of position. (b) When the particle moves into a region of increasing potential energy, what happens to its wavelength? (c) At a point where \(E=U(x),\) Newtonian mechanics says that the particle has zero kinetic energy and must be instantaneously at rest. Such a point is called a classical turning point, since this is where a Newtonian particle must stop its motion and reverse direction. As an example, an object oscillating in simple harmonic motion with amplitude \(A\) moves back and forth between the points \(x=-A\) and \(x=+A ;\) each of these is a classical turning point, since there the potential energy \(\frac{1}{2} k^{\prime} x^{2}\) equals the total energy \(\frac{1}{2} k^{\prime} A^{2}\). In the WKB expression for \(\lambda(x),\) what is the wavelength at a classical turning point? (d) For a particle in a box with length \(L,\) the walls of the box are classical turning points (see Fig. 40.8\()\) Furthermore, the number of wavelengths that fit within the box must be a half-integer (see Fig. 40.10 ), so that \(L=(n / 2) \lambda\) and hence \(L / \lambda=n / 2,\) where \(n=1,2,3, \ldots\) [Note that this is a restatement of Eq. (40.29).] The WKB scheme for finding the allowed bound-state energy levels of an arbitrary potential well is an extension of these observations. It demands that for an allowed energy \(E\), there must be a half-integer number of wavelengths between the classical turning points for that energy. Since the wavelength in the WKB approximation is not a constant but depends on \(x\), the number of wavelengths between the classical turning points \(a\) and \(b\) for a given value of the energy is the integral of \(1 / \lambda(x)\) between those points: $$ \int_{a}^{b} \frac{d x}{\lambda(x)}=\frac{n}{2} \quad(n=1,2,3, \ldots) $$ Using the expression for \(\lambda(x)\) you found in part (a), show that the \(W K B\) condition for an allowed bound-state energy can be written as $$ \int_{a}^{b} \sqrt{2 m[E-U(x)]} d x=\frac{n h}{2} \quad(n=1,2,3, \ldots) $$ (e) As a check on the expression in part (d), apply it to a particle in a box with walls at \(x=0\) and \(x=L\). Evaluate the integral and show that the allowed energy levels according to the WKB approximation are the same as those given by Eq. (40.31). (Hint: since the walls of the box are infinitely high, the points \(x=0\) and \(x=L\) are classical turning points for any energy \(E .\) Inside the box, the potential energy is zero.) (f) For the finite square well shown in Fig. \(40.13,\) show that the \(\mathrm{WKB}\) expression given in part (d) predicts the same bound-state energies as for an infinite square well of the same width. (Hint: Assume \(E

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.