/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q32E Three polarizing filters are sta... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Three polarizing filters are stacked, with the polarizing axis of the second and third filters at 23.0° and 62.0°, respectively, to that of the first. If unpolarized light is incident on the stack, the light has intensity 55.0 W/cm2after it passes through the stack. If the incident intensity is kept constant but the second polarizer is removed, what is the intensity of the light after it has passed through the stack?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The intensity of the light after passing through the stack is

Step by step solution

01

Malus’s law

According to Malus' law, the intensity of plane-polarized light that travels through an analyzer varies as the square of the cosine of the angle between the plane of the polarizer and the analyzer’s transmission axes.

the intensity of polarised light that passes through an analyzer

maximum transmitted light

angle between the polarization axis of light and the analyzer

No matter how the polarising axis is oriented, when unpolarized light is incident on an ideal polarizer, the intensity of the transmitted light is exactly half that of the incident unpolarized light.

The incident wave's E field is divided into two components: one parallel to the polarizing axis and one perpendicular to it. Because the incident light is a random mixture of all polarisation states, these two components are equal on average. Because the perfect polarizer only transmits the component parallel to the polarising axis, only half of the incoming intensity is transferred.

02

Calculation

The intensity of incident light

The first stack;

The second stack;

The third stack;

Given;

On putting the values;

03

Intensity of the light after passing through the stack

After removing the second stack;

The first stack;

The second stack;

Hence, the intensity of the light after passing through the stack is

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

.. DATA While researching the use of laser pointers, you conduct a diffraction experiment with two thin parallel slits.

Your result is the pattern of closely spaced bright and dark fringes shown in Fig. P36.63. (Only the central portion of the pattern is shown.) You measure that the bright spots are equally spaced at centre to centre (except for the missing spots) on a screen that is from the slits. The light source was a helium–neon laser producing a wavelength of . (a) How far apart are the two slits? (b) How wide is each one?

Young’s experiment is performed with light from excited helium atoms (λ= 502 nm). Fringes are measured carefully on a screen 1.20 m away from the double slit, and the center of the 20th fringe (not counting the central bright fringe) is found to be 10.6 mm from the center of the central bright fringe. What is the separation of the two slits?

A very thin soap film (n = 1.33), whose thickness is much less than a wavelength of visible light, looks black; it appears to reflect no light at all. Why? By contrast, an equally thin layer of soapy water (n = 1.33) on glass (n = 1.50) appears quite shiny. Why is there a difference?

A beam of light goes from one material into another. On physical grounds, explain why the wavelength changes but the frequency and period do not.

A uniform film of TiO2 , 1036 nm thick and having index of refraction 2.62, is spread uniformly over the surface of crown glass of refractive index 1.52. Light of wavelength 520.0 nm falls at normal incidence onto the film from air. You want to increase the thickness of this film so that the reflected light cancels.

(a) What is the minimumthickness of TiO2 that you must addso the reflected light cancels as desired?

(b) After you make the adjustment in part (a), what is the path difference between the light reflected off the top of the film and the light that cancels it after traveling through the film? Express your answer in (i) nanometers and (ii) wavelengths of the light in the TiO2 film.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.