91影视

The ratio of the work done by the engine to the heat input at high temperature is termed the efficiency of the engine.

The expression for the efficiency is given as:

\(e = \frac{W}{{{Q_{\rm{H}}}}} = 1 - \frac{{{Q_{\rm{L}}}}}{{{Q_{\rm{H}}}}}\) 鈥� (i)

Here, W is the work done, \({Q_{\rm{H}}}\) is the heat input at high temperature, and \({Q_{\rm{L}}}\) is the heat exhausted at low temperature.

The work produced by the engine is \(W = 2\;{\rm{MW}}\).

The intake thermal energy is \({Q_1} = 3\;{\rm{MW}}\).

The initial temperature is \({T_1} = 425\;{\rm{K}}\).

The final temperature is \({T_2} = 215\;{\rm{K}}\).

The rejected thermal energy is \({Q_2} = 1\;{\rm{MW}}\).

The real efficiency of the engine is given by:

\(e = \frac{W}{{{Q_1}}}\)

Substitute the values in the above expression.

\(\begin{array}{l}e = \left( {\frac{{2\;{\rm{MW}}}}{{3\;{\rm{MW}}}}} \right)\\e = 0.66 \times 100\% \\e = 66\% \end{array}\)

The relation of ideal efficiency is given by:

\({e_{\rm{i}}} = 1 - \frac{{{T_1}}}{{{T_2}}}\)

Substitute the values in the above expression.

\(\begin{array}{l}{\eta _{\rm{i}}} = 1 - \left( {\frac{{215\;{\rm{K}}}}{{425\;{\rm{K}}}}} \right)\\{\eta _{\rm{i}}} = 0.49 \times 100\% \\{\eta _{\rm{i}}} = 49\% \end{array}\)

The engine made by the inventor is not possible because the engine鈥檚 real efficiency is more than its ideal efficiency. Thus, there is something fishy about his claim.