/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 It is claimed that some professi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

It is claimed that some professional baseball players can see which way the ball is spinning as it travels toward home plate. One way to judge this claim is to estimate the distance at which a batter can first hope to resolve two points on opposite sides of a baseball, which has a diameter of \(0.0738 \mathrm{m} .\) (a) Estimate this distance, assuming that the pupil of the eye has a diameter of \(2.0 \mathrm{mm}\) and the wavelength of the light is \(550 \mathrm{nm}\) in vacuum. (b) Considering that the distance between the pitcher's mound and home plate is \(18.4 \mathrm{m},\) can you rule out the claim based on your answer to part (a)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Baseball players can't visually resolve spin from 18.4m.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We aim to determine if a batter can resolve the spin of a baseball. Using the baseball diameter, eye pupil size, and light wavelength, we'll calculate the minimum distance a batter can resolve two opposite points on the ball. Then, we'll compare it to the distance from pitcher's mound to home plate.
02

Applying Rayleigh's Criterion

Rayleigh's Criterion for resolution is given by \( \theta = 1.22 \frac{\lambda}{D} \), where \( \theta \) is the angular resolution in radians, \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of light, and \( D \) is the pupil diameter. Substituting \( \lambda = 550 \times 10^{-9} \) m and \( D = 2.0 \times 10^{-3} \) m, the equation becomes: \( \theta = 1.22 \times \frac{550 \times 10^{-9}}{2.0 \times 10^{-3}} \).
03

Calculating Angular Resolution

Calculate \( \theta \): \( \theta = 1.22 \times \frac{550 \times 10^{-9}}{2.0 \times 10^{-3}} = 3.355 \times 10^{-4} \) radians.
04

Estimating the Minimum Resolving Distance

Using small angle approximation \( \theta \approx \frac{d}{L} \), where \( d \) is the diameter of the baseball (0.0738 m), and \( L \) is the distance, rearrange to find \( L = \frac{d}{\theta} \). Substitute \( d = 0.0738 \) m and \( \theta = 3.355 \times 10^{-4} \): \( L = \frac{0.0738}{3.355 \times 10^{-4}} \).
05

Solving for Minimum Resolving Distance

Calculate \( L \): \( L = \frac{0.0738}{3.355 \times 10^{-4}} = 219.95 \) meters, approximately 220 meters.
06

Evaluating Against the Pitch Distance

Compare the resolving distance (220 m) with the mound-to-plate distance (18.4 m). Since 220 m is much greater than 18.4 m, at 18.4 m, a batter cannot resolve the spin based on light resolution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Angular Resolution
Angular resolution is a key concept in optical sciences. It refers to the ability of an optical system, like the human eye, to distinguish between two closely spaced objects. It is determined by the smallest angle at which two points can be differentiated. For practical purposes, consider this angle as a measure of how sharp an image is.
Rayleigh's Criterion is used to quantify angular resolution. According to this criterion, the angular resolution, \( \theta \), is calculated using the formula:
  • \( \theta = 1.22 \frac{\lambda}{D} \)
where \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of light, and \( D \) is the diameter of the lens or aperture. In the context of the human eye, this diameter is the pupil size.
For example, by substituting \( \lambda = 550 \times 10^{-9} \) meters (which is the wavelength of green light, a common wavelength measuring light resolution) and \( D = 2.0 \times 10^{-3} \) meters (the average daytime pupil size), we get an angular resolution of about \( 3.355 \times 10^{-4} \) radians. This measurement determines the clarity with which we can discern objects.
Calculating Resolving Distance
Resolving distance is the physical distance at which two points can be distinguished. This is calculated using the angular resolution and the diameter of the object you are trying to observe.
For the baseball scenario, we consider the diameter of the baseball as \( d = 0.0738 \) meters. The resolving distance, \( L \), can be found using the formula:
  • \( \theta \approx \frac{d}{L} \)
Solving for \( L \), gives:
  • \( L = \frac{d}{\theta} = \frac{0.0738}{3.355 \times 10^{-4}} \)
This calculation results in \( L \approx 220 \) meters. This means that, for a batter to distinguish the spin of a baseball, he would need to be approximately 220 meters away. At such a distance, due to optics, our resolution of the spinning of the baseball breaks down.
Optical Limits in Sports
Optical limits matter a lot in sports, as athletes must quickly make decisions based on what they see. Understanding these limits help evaluate claims about human capabilities, such as seeing a spinning baseball.
In sports like baseball, where decisions happen in the blink of an eye, the ability to resolve details can determine success or failure. Analyzing optical limits using physics, as in the case of resolving a baseball’s spin, helps players and coaches understand the plausible range of human perception.
Given that the resolving distance calculated is much farther than the typical 18.4-meter distance from the pitcher's mound to home plate, it becomes apparent why claims regarding the ability to see every detail of a fast, spinning ball are viewed with skepticism. While some highly trained players may better perceive partial rotation clues due to excellent vision skills and experience, the limits of human optical resolution suggest that seeing "which way" it spins is more about intuition and experience than sheer optical ability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How many dark fringes will be produced on either side of the central maximum if light \((\lambda=651 \mathrm{nm})\) is incident on a single slit that is \(5.47 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{m}\) wide?

In a setup like that in Figure \(27.7,\) a wavelength of \(625 \mathrm{nm}\) is used in a Young's double-slit experiment. The separation between the slits is \(d=\) \(1.4 \times 10^{-5} \mathrm{m} .\) The total width of the screen is \(0.20 \mathrm{m} .\) In one version of the setup, the separation between the double slit and the screen is \(L_{\mathrm{A}}=0.35 \mathrm{m}\) whereas in another version it is \(L_{\mathrm{B}}=0.50 \mathrm{m} .\) On one side of the central bright fringe, how many bright fringes lie on the screen in the two versions of the setup? Do not include the central bright fringe in your counting.

A soap film \((n=1.33)\) is 465 nm thick and lies on a glass plate \((n=1.52) .\) Sunlight, whose wavelengths (in vacuum) extend from 380 to \(750 \mathrm{nm},\) travels through the air and strikes the film perpendicularly. For which wavelength(s) in this range does destructive interference cause the film to look dark in reflected light?

A transparent film \((n=1.43)\) is deposited on a glass plate \((n=1.52)\) to form a nonreflecting coating. The film has a thickness that is \(1.07 \times 10^{-7} \mathrm{m} .\) What is the longest possible wavelength (in vacuum) of light for which this film has been designed?

Two diffraction gratings, A and B, are located at the same distance from the observation screens. Light with the same wavelength \(\lambda\) is used for each. The separation between adjacent principal maxima for grating \(\mathrm{A}\) is \(2.7 \mathrm{cm},\) and for grating \(\mathrm{B}\) it is \(3.2 \mathrm{cm} .\) Grating A has 2000 lines per meter. How many lines per meter does grating B have? (Hint: The diffraction angles are small enough that the approximation \(\sin \theta \approx \tan \theta\) can be used.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.