/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 Consider a two-level system with... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a two-level system with \(E_{1}0\) by exactly solving the coupled differential equation $$ i \hbar \dot{c}_{k}=\sum_{n=1}^{2} V_{k n}(t) e^{i \omega_{k n} t} c_{n} \quad(k=1,2) $$ b. Do the same problem using time-dependent perturbation theory to lowest nonvanishing order. Compare the two approaches for small values of \(\gamma\). Treat the following two cases separately: (i) \(\omega\) very different from \(\omega_{21}\) and (ii) \(\omega\) close to \(\omega_{21}\). Answer for (a): (Rabi's formula) $$ \begin{aligned} &\left|c_{2}(t)\right|^{2}=\frac{\gamma^{2} / \hbar^{2}}{\gamma^{2} / \hbar^{2}+\left(\omega-\omega_{21}\right)^{2} / 4} \sin ^{2}\left\\{\left[\frac{\gamma^{2}}{\hbar^{2}}+\frac{\left(\omega-\omega_{21}\right)^{2}}{4}\right]^{1 / 2} t\right\\} \\ &\left|c_{1}(t)\right|^{2}=1-\left|c_{2}(t)\right|^{2} \end{aligned} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
For small \(\gamma\), use perturbation theory; when near resonance \((\omega \approx \omega_{21})\), both methods agree better. Rabi's formula provides exact solutions.

Step by step solution

01

Solve the Coupled Differential Equations

To find \(\left|c_1(t)\right|^2\) and \(\left|c_2(t)\right|^2\), we start by solving the coupled differential equation using the given potential terms. The equation is: \[ i \hbar \dot{c}_k = \sum_{n=1}^{2} V_{k n}(t) e^{i \omega_{k n} t} c_{n} \quad (k=1,2) \]Given \(V_{12} = \gamma e^{i \omega t}\) and \(V_{21} = \gamma e^{-i \omega t}\), and \(V_{11}=V_{22}=0\), the equations simplify to:\[ i \hbar \dot{c}_1 = \gamma e^{i(\omega - \omega_{21})t} c_2 \]\[ i \hbar \dot{c}_2 = \gamma e^{-i(\omega - \omega_{21})t} c_1 \]We must solve these equations under the initial conditions \(c_1(0)=1\) and \(c_2(0)=0\).
02

Deriving Rabi's Formula

The system of equations can be treated using the known solutions for a two-level system. Assuming harmonic oscillation and looking for solutions of the form \(c_1(t) = A e^{-i \Delta_1 t}\) and \(c_2(t) = B e^{-i \Delta_2 t}\), where \(\Delta_1\) and \(\Delta_2\) are constants to be determined. Simplifying and considering resonance, we derive:\[ \left|c_2(t)\right|^2 = \frac{\gamma^2 / \hbar^2}{\gamma^2 / \hbar^2 + (\omega - \omega_{21})^2 / 4} \sin^2 \left(\sqrt{\frac{\gamma^2}{\hbar^2} + \frac{(\omega - \omega_{21})^2}{4}} \cdot t\right) \]\[ \left|c_1(t)\right|^2 = 1 - \left|c_2(t)\right|^2 \]This is the exact solution for \(t>0\).
03

Apply Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory

Apply time-dependent perturbation theory to lowest nonvanishing order to solve the problem approximately. First, evaluate the matrix element:\[ V_{12} = \gamma e^{i \omega t} \]Using the perturbation theory, the transition amplitude from state 1 to state 2, \(c_2(t)\), is:\[ c_2(t) = \frac{-i}{\hbar} \int_0^t \gamma e^{i (\omega - \omega_{21}) t'} dt' \]= \[ -\frac{\gamma}{\hbar (\omega - \omega_{21})} (e^{i(\omega - \omega_{21}) t} - 1) \]For small \(\gamma\), expanding this expression and taking magnitudes, find \(\left|c_2(t)\right|^2\). Noticing dependence on \(\omega - \omega_{21}\):- When \(\omega\) is very different from \(\omega_{21}\), \(\left|c_2(t)\right|^2\) stays small.- When \(\omega\) is close to \(\omega_{21}\), \(\left|c_2(t)\right|^2\) is maximized.
04

Compare Exact and Perturbative Solutions

Compare the two solutions:- Exact solution (Rabi's Formula): More accurate for all \(t\), especially when \(\omega\) is close to the resonance \(\omega_{21}\).- Perturbative solution: Valid when \(\gamma\) is small and \(\omega\) is either far from or close to \(\omega_{21}\) but predominantly an approximation.Notice that the approximation breaks down when \(\gamma t\) is large enough, showcasing the non-linear behavior near resonance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-Level Quantum System
In quantum mechanics, the concept of a two-level quantum system is foundational. It refers to a simplified system where a quantum entity can exist in one of two energy states. Imagine it like a light switch that can be either on or off. This system is often depicted using two energy levels, denoted as \(E_1\) and \(E_2\), with \(E_1 < E_2\).
Such systems are characterized by their simplicity, yet they pack a punch when it comes to demonstrating core quantum phenomena. Two-level systems serve as models for various physical situations, such as an electron in an atom that transitions between two substates due to external influences, like a magnetic field.
In this exercise, our two-level system is influenced by a time-dependent potential, a mechanism that promotes transitions between these two states. Understanding this system helps us grasp many complex real-world quantum systems in engineering and physics.
Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Time-dependent perturbation theory is an essential tool in quantum mechanics that aids in analyzing the effect of a time-varying disturbance on a quantum system. It helps predict how the system evolves over time when it is not isolated but exposed to external influences.
This theory is especially useful in scenarios where the disturbance is weak and the changes it induces are small. It works by expanding the state of the system into a series, allowing the calculation of probabilities for state transitions. Just like peering through a telescope into the night sky helps spot distant stars, this method lets us explore small yet significant chances of transitions between quantum states.
In the given problem, the system's potential perturbation connects two energy levels. Through time-dependent perturbation theory, we can approximate the transition probabilities from one state to another, aiding in our understanding of quantum dynamics practically.
Rabi's Formula
Rabi's formula offers an exact solution for how a quantum system transitions between two levels when subjected to a periodic external field. It's an elegant solution that emerges from solving the Schrödinger equation for a two-level system driven by such an oscillating field.
The formula predicts the probability of finding the system in one of its two states as a function of time, especially under resonance conditions, where the driving frequency matches the natural frequency difference of the two energy levels.
Expressed mathematically as:\[\left|c_2(t)\right|^2 = \frac{\gamma^2 / \hbar^2}{\gamma^2 / \hbar^2 + (\omega - \omega_{21})^2 / 4} \sin^2 \left( \sqrt{\frac{\gamma^2}{\hbar^2} + \frac{(\omega - \omega_{21})^2}{4}} \cdot t \right)\]
This gives an exact description of the oscillatory behavior of the system's occupation probabilities between the states. Rabi's formula is crucial for understanding quantum behavior in fields like nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and quantum computing.
Differential Equations in Quantum Mechanics
Differential equations are a cornerstone in the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics. They are used to describe the evolution of quantum systems over time.
In the context of this exercise, the Schrödinger equation, which is a type of differential equation, governs how the coefficients \(c_1(t)\) and \(c_2(t)\) describing the probability amplitudes of our two-state system evolve over time. Solving this equation involves manipulating these equations to predict how the system transitions between the two states.
In a more intuitive sense, think of these equations like rules that determine how fast and in what manner our quantum switch flips back and forth between its possible states. Understanding these differential equations is key to unlocking more complex quantum systems and predicting their behaviors in a dynamic setting, essential for both theoretical predictions and practical applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

This chapter derived two of the three relativistic corrections to the one- electron atom, namely \(\Delta_{K}^{(1)}\) from "relativistic kinetic energy," and \(\Delta_{L S}^{(1)}\) from the spin-orbit interaction. A third term comes from the spread of the electron wave function in the region of changing electric field. The perturbation for this "Darwin term" is $$ V_{D}=-\frac{1}{8 m^{2} c^{2}} \sum_{i=1}^{3}\left[p_{i},\left[p_{i}, e \phi(r)\right]\right] $$ where \(\phi(r)\) is the Coulomb potential. Find \(\Delta_{D}^{(1)}\) and show that $$ \Delta_{n j}^{(1)} \equiv \Delta_{K}^{(1)}+\Delta_{L S}^{(1)}+\Delta_{D}^{(1)}=\frac{m c^{2}(Z \alpha)^{4}}{2 n^{3}}\left[\frac{3}{4 n}-\frac{1}{j+1 / 2}\right] . $$ In Section \(8.4\) we will compare this expression to the result of solving the Dirac equation in the presence of the Coulomb potential.

A diatomic molecule can be modeled as a rigid rotor with moment of inertia \(I\) and an electric dipole moment \(d\) along the axis of the rotor. The rotor is constrained to rotate in a plane, and a weak uniform electric field \(\mathscr{E}\) lies in the plane. Write the classical Hamiltonian for the rotor, and find the unperturbed energy levels by quantizing the angular- momentum operator. Then treat the electric field as a perturbation, and find the first nonvanishing corrections to the energy levels.

Suppose the electron had a very small intrinsic electric dipole moment analogous to the spin magnetic moment (that is, \(\mu_{e l}\) proportional to \(\sigma\) ). Treating the hypothetical \(-\mu_{e l} \cdot \mathbf{E}\) interaction as a small perturbation, discuss qualitatively how the energy levels of the Na atom \((Z=11)\) would be altered in the absence of any external electromagnetic field. Are the level shifts first order or second order? State explicitly which states get mixed with each other. Obtain an expression for the energy shift of the lowest level that is affected by the perturbation. Assume throughout that only the valence electron is subjected to the hypothetical interaction.

Consider an isotropic harmonic oscillator in two dimensions. The Hamiltonian is $$ H_{0}=\frac{p_{x}^{2}}{2 m}+\frac{p_{y}^{2}}{2 m}+\frac{m \omega^{2}}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) $$ a. What are the energies of the three lowest-lying states? Is there any degeneracy? b. We now apply a perturbation $$ V=\delta m \omega^{2} x y $$ where \(\delta\) is a dimensionless real number much smaller than unity. Find the zerothorder energy eigenket and the corresponding energy to first order [that is, the unperturbed energy obtained in (a) plus the first-order energy shift] for each of the three lowest-lying states. c. Solve the \(H_{0}+V\) problem exactly. Compare with the perturbation results obtained in (b).

A one-electron atom whose ground state is nondegenerate is placed in a uniform electric field in the \(z\)-direction. Obtain an approximate expression for the induced electric dipole moment of the ground state by considering the expectation value of ez with respect to the perturbed state vector computed to first order. Show that the same expression can also be obtained from the energy shift \(\Delta=-\alpha|\mathbf{E}|^{2} / 2\) of the ground state computed to second order. (Note: \(\alpha\) stands for the polarizability.) Ignore spin.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.