/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 A simple harmonic oscillator (in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A simple harmonic oscillator (in one dimension) is subjected to a perturbation $$ H_{1}=b x $$ where \(b\) is a real constant. a. Calculate the energy shift of the ground state to lowest nonvanishing order. b. Solve this problem exactly and compare with your result obtained in (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified
a: 0; b: Exact shift is \(-\frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We have a simple harmonic oscillator being perturbed by the term \(H_1 = b x\). We need to find the energy shift of the ground state due to this perturbation.
02

Finding the Perturbation Energy Correction

To find the lowest order energy correction, we use first-order perturbation theory. The correction to the energy of a state \(|n\rangle\) is \(E_n^{(1)} = \langle n | H_1 | n \rangle\). For the ground state \(|0\rangle\), this becomes \(E_0^{(1)} = \langle 0 | b x | 0 \rangle\). Since the expectation value of \(x\) in the ground state is zero (due to symmetry), \(E_0^{(1)} = 0\). Thus, the ground state energy shift is zero to first order.
03

Solving the Problem Exactly

An exact solution involves solving the Hamiltonian \(H = H_0 + H_1 = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 + b x\). Completing the square in the potential energy, we have \(\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2\left(x + \frac{b}{m\omega^2}\right)^2 - \frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\). This represents a shift in the equilibrium position and a constant energy shift \(-\frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\). The exact energy shift of the ground state is thus \(-\frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\).
04

Comparing Results

In (a), we found the energy shift to be zero via first-order perturbation theory. In the exact solution, we found the shift to be \(-\frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\). The discrepancy arises because the first-order correction is zero, and the first non-zero correction comes from second-order or higher terms, captured by the exact solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Perturbation Theory
When a simple quantum system is disturbed by an external influence, perturbation theory helps us analyze the effect of this disturbance. Imagine a calm pond, where a stone is gently dropped, causing ripples that disturb the water surface. Similarly, in quantum mechanics, the simple harmonic oscillator can be affected by a small perturbation, such as the additional term \(H_1 = b x\) in our case.

Perturbation theory provides a framework to calculate how the energies and states of the system deviate due to this perturbation. Here, instead of re-calculating everything from scratch, we evaluate the changes to leading orders.

We use different orders of perturbation to approximate changes in the energy levels:
  • **First-order perturbation** calculates the initial estimate of how energy levels shift.
  • Higher orders provide corrections to this estimate, giving more accurate results.
In our exercise, we utilized first-order perturbation theory to estimate the ground state energy shift, which turned out to be zero. This indicates first-order corrections alone may not be sufficient in some cases, leading us to seek higher-order effects or exact solutions.
Energy Correction
Energy correction refers to adjustments made to the energy levels of quantum systems due to perturbations. In our example, we start with the fundamental energy of a harmonic oscillator and then add a small term \(b x\) to see what happens.

Using first-order perturbation theory, the energy correction for any quantum state \(|n\rangle\) can be calculated using the formula:\[E_n^{(1)} = \langle n | H_1 | n \rangle\]For the ground state \(|0\rangle\), it translates to:\[E_0^{(1)} = \langle 0 | b x | 0 \rangle\]This mathematical expression represents the expected energy change due to the perturbation, calculated as an average over the probability distribution of the oscillating particle's position.

In this specific example, the energy correction remained zero because the average value of \(x\) in the ground state is zero. However, this is not the end of our exploration, as further energy corrections could be necessary to understand more intricate effects.
Ground State Energy Shift
The ground state in quantum mechanics is the lowest energy state a system can occupy. Determining how this energy shifts when the system is perturbed is crucial for understanding system behavior. In our exercise, applying the perturbation \(b x\) influences the ground state's energy.

Initially, using first-order perturbation calculations, we found no shift in the ground state energy—the calculated correction was zero. This result highlights the limitations of low-order calculations in the presence of certain types of perturbations.

An exact solution involving the complete Hamiltonian \(H = H_0 + H_1\) was needed to capture all effects. By rewriting the potential as a complete square, we rephrased the problem to identify a constant energy shift:\[-\frac{b^2}{2m\omega^2}\]This more advanced result shows how detailed solutions are sometimes necessary to capture the full picture, especially for subtle shifts that low-order perturbation fails to reveal. In summary, perturbations can have negligible effects at first glance, yet substantially impact the results upon deeper analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a two-level system with \(E_{1}0\) by exactly solving the coupled differential equation $$ i \hbar \dot{c}_{k}=\sum_{n=1}^{2} V_{k n}(t) e^{i \omega_{k n} t} c_{n} \quad(k=1,2) $$ b. Do the same problem using time-dependent perturbation theory to lowest nonvanishing order. Compare the two approaches for small values of \(\gamma\). Treat the following two cases separately: (i) \(\omega\) very different from \(\omega_{21}\) and (ii) \(\omega\) close to \(\omega_{21}\). Answer for (a): (Rabi's formula) $$ \begin{aligned} &\left|c_{2}(t)\right|^{2}=\frac{\gamma^{2} / \hbar^{2}}{\gamma^{2} / \hbar^{2}+\left(\omega-\omega_{21}\right)^{2} / 4} \sin ^{2}\left\\{\left[\frac{\gamma^{2}}{\hbar^{2}}+\frac{\left(\omega-\omega_{21}\right)^{2}}{4}\right]^{1 / 2} t\right\\} \\ &\left|c_{1}(t)\right|^{2}=1-\left|c_{2}(t)\right|^{2} \end{aligned} $$

Suppose the electron had a very small intrinsic electric dipole moment analogous to the spin magnetic moment (that is, \(\mu_{e l}\) proportional to \(\sigma\) ). Treating the hypothetical \(-\mu_{e l} \cdot \mathbf{E}\) interaction as a small perturbation, discuss qualitatively how the energy levels of the Na atom \((Z=11)\) would be altered in the absence of any external electromagnetic field. Are the level shifts first order or second order? State explicitly which states get mixed with each other. Obtain an expression for the energy shift of the lowest level that is affected by the perturbation. Assume throughout that only the valence electron is subjected to the hypothetical interaction.

Consider an atom made up of an electron and a singly charged \((Z=1)\) triton \(\left({ }^{3} \mathrm{H}\right)\). Initially the system is in its ground state \((n=1, l=0)\). Suppose the system undergoes beta decay, in which the nuclear charge suddenly increases by one unit (realistically by emitting an electron and an antineutrino). This means that the tritium nucleus (called a "triton") turns into a helium \((Z=2)\) nucleus of mass \(3\left({ }^{3} \mathrm{He}\right)\). a. Obtain the probability for the system to be found in the ground state of the resulting helium ion. b. The available energy in tritium beta decay is about \(18 \mathrm{keV}\) and the size of the \({ }^{3} \mathrm{He}\) atom is about \(1 \AA\). Check that the time scale \(T\) for the transformation satisfies the criterion of validity for the sudden approximation.

A particle of mass \(m\) constrained to move in one dimension is confined within \(0L \\ V=0 & \text { for } 0 \leq x \leq L \end{array} $$ Obtain an expression for the density of states (that is, the number of states per unit energy interval) for high energies as a function of \(E\). (Check your dimension!)

Consider an isotropic harmonic oscillator in two dimensions. The Hamiltonian is $$ H_{0}=\frac{p_{x}^{2}}{2 m}+\frac{p_{y}^{2}}{2 m}+\frac{m \omega^{2}}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right) $$ a. What are the energies of the three lowest-lying states? Is there any degeneracy? b. We now apply a perturbation $$ V=\delta m \omega^{2} x y $$ where \(\delta\) is a dimensionless real number much smaller than unity. Find the zerothorder energy eigenket and the corresponding energy to first order [that is, the unperturbed energy obtained in (a) plus the first-order energy shift] for each of the three lowest-lying states. c. Solve the \(H_{0}+V\) problem exactly. Compare with the perturbation results obtained in (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.