/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6CQ Question: An electron beam strik... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Question: An electron beam strikes a barrier with a single narrow slit, and the electron flux number of electrons per unit time per unit area detected at the very center of the resulting intensity pattern is . Next, two more identical slits are opened, equidistant on either side of the first and equally 鈥渋lluminated鈥 by the beam. What will be the flux at the very center now? Does your answer imply that more than three times as many electrons pass through three slits than through one? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer:

The number of electrons detected in the middle region will be nine times more than the number detected at the single slit since the flux is proportional to the number of slits squared. The initial beam intensity, or the quantity of electrons assaulted each second, is maintained

Step by step solution

01

The wavelength of a particle 

The wavelength of a particle can be obtained using the formula =hp=hmv.

02

Explanation

There is more destructive and beneficial interference between matter waves as the number of slits rises. As a result, the combined amplitude of additional matter waves increases (remember how a diffraction grating is compared to a double slit in terms of the interference pattern). Now, much like the intensity and the electric field , the probability density is proportional to the wave amplitude squared 2.

Consequently, when the wave amplitude triples, the probability density will increase by 9 times, which will be seen on the screen as 9 more electrons striking the same region per second, or flux.

It is important to note that the initial beam intensity (the number of electrons assaulted per second of the beam) has not changed; the only change we have made is to increase the number of slits. However, this has changed how the electrons are distributed across the screen; as a result, more of them are now restricted to smaller regions.

Therefore, to balance off the destructive interference and preserve the overall amount of energy, the constructive interference occurred, and as we can see, it does so in a non-linear (squared) way.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A beam of electrons strikes a crystal at an anglewith the atomic planes, reflects of many atomic planes below the surface, and then passes into a detector also making anglewith the atomic planes. (a) If the minimumgiving constructive interference is.35掳 What is the ratio位/诲, Where is the spacing between atomic planes? (b) At what other angles, if any, would constructive interference occur?

A mosquito of mass 0.15mgis found to be flying at a speed of 50cm/swithin an uncertainty of 0.5mm/s.(a) How precisely may its position be known? (b) Does this inherent uncertainty present any hindrance to the application of classical mechanics?

The Moon orbits Earth at a radius of 3.84脳108m. To do so as a classical particle. Its wavelength should be small. But small relative to what? Being a rough measure of the region where it is confined, the orbit radius is certainly a relevant dimension against which to compare the wavelength. Compare the two. Does the Moon indeed orbit as a classical particle? (localid="1659095974931" mEarth=5.98脳1024kgand mmoon=7.35脳1022kg)

In Section 4.3, it is shown that(x,t)=Ae颈(办虫-蝇t)satisfies the free-particle Schr枚dinger equation for allxandt, provided only that the constants are related by(k)2/2m=. Show that when the function,(x,t)=Acos(kx0x)is plugged into the Schrodinger equation, the result cannot possibly hold for all values of x and t, no matter how the constants may be related.

All other things being equal, which would be more likely to exhibit its wave nature鈥攁 proton or an electron鈥攁nd why? By making something unequal, how could you 鈥渃ompensate,鈥 so as to make one as wavelike as the other?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.