/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2CQ Generally speaking, why is the w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Generally speaking, why is the wave nature of matter so counterintuitive?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Because the common dimensions of the world we live in dwarf the wavelength of an electron. Its particle nature is unknown to us; hence a wave nature is unexpected.

Step by step solution

01

The double slit experiment

The double slit experiment is a well-known physics demonstration. It illustrates, with unequalled weirdness, that small atoms and molecules have a wave-like quality to them, and it implies that simply viewing a particle has a huge influence on its functioning.

02

Explanation

Because the wavelength of typical particles is significantly less than the wavelength of an electron, it is highly challenging to witness the wave character of particles in daily life. This is based on the de-Broglie identity which states that =hp,where p=mvclassically, because the value of h is so tiny, a small number in the denominator is required to get a wavelength that can be measured.

So, for tiny particles like electrons, a wave-nature will predominate; otherwise, it won't be apparent, and we question their wave-nature.In conclusion, since our perceptions are tied to the dimensions we inhabit鈥攚hich are substantially larger than those of electrons鈥攚e could also anticipate that our conduct will differ.The similar issue emerges with relativity, whose conclusions of time dilation and length contraction are illogical given that we don't often move at or even close to the speed of light.If we had the ability to exist in smaller dimensions or much quicker frames, perhaps all of these occurrences and others would make more sense.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A beam of electrons strikes a crystal at an anglewith the atomic planes, reflects of many atomic planes below the surface, and then passes into a detector also making anglewith the atomic planes. (a) If the minimumgiving constructive interference is.35掳 What is the ratio位/诲, Where is the spacing between atomic planes? (b) At what other angles, if any, would constructive interference occur?

Because we have found no way to formulate quantum mechanics based on a single real wave function, we have a choice to make. In Section 4.3,it is said that our choice of using complex numbers is a conventional one. Show that the free-particle Schrodinger equation (4.8) is equivalent to two real equations involving two real functions, as follows:

-221(x,t)m=2(x,t)tand

-222(x,t)m=1(x,t)t

where (x,t)is by definition 1(x,t)+i2(x,t). How is the complex approach chosen in Section4.3more convenient than the alternative posed here?

Determine the Compton wavelength of the electron, defined to be the wavelength it would have if its momentum weremec.

The uncertainty in the position of a baseball of mass0.145kgism.What is the minimum uncertainty in its speed?

In the hydrogen atom, the electron鈥檚 orbit, not necessarily circular, extends to a distance of a about an angstrom (1脜=0.1鈥塶尘)from the proton. If it is to move about as a compact classical particle in the region where it is confined, the electron鈥檚 wavelength had better always be much smaller than an angstrom. Here we investigate how large might be the electron鈥檚 wavelength. If orbiting as a particle, its speed at 1脜could be no faster than that for circular orbit at that radius. Why? Find the corresponding wavelength and compare it to1脜 . Can the atom be treated classically?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.