/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q34E Because we have found no way to ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Because we have found no way to formulate quantum mechanics based on a single real wave function, we have a choice to make. In Section 4.3,it is said that our choice of using complex numbers is a conventional one. Show that the free-particle Schrodinger equation (4.8) is equivalent to two real equations involving two real functions, as follows:

-221(x,t)m=2(x,t)tand

-222(x,t)m=1(x,t)t

where (x,t)is by definition 1(x,t)+i2(x,t). How is the complex approach chosen in Section4.3more convenient than the alternative posed here?

Short Answer

Expert verified

We should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations, using the information that=1+i2.

Step by step solution

01

Combining two partial differential equations.

So, as suggested in the section, combining the two partial differential equations into a single equation should greatly simplify our analysis. We should be able to reconstruct the original Schrodinger equation using the two supplied equations and the information that=1+i2.

22m21(x,t)x2=2(x,t)t

-22m22(x,t)x2=1(x,t)t

Subtracting equation(1) from the equation (2), after multiplying it by i with equation(2).

22m-i22(x,t)x2-21(x,t)x2=i1(x,t)t-2(x,t)t

-22m21(x,t)+i2(x,t)x2=i1(x,t)+i2(x,t)t

=1+i2


-22m2x2=it

This is the same equation as in the section 4.3, we only have to solve one differential equation (for a complex function) rather than two differential equations (for real functions), which is a significant simplification given the cost of complexification.

02

Conclusion

Using =1+i2we should be able to recover the original Schrodinger equation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Classically and nonrelativistically, we say that the energyEof a massive free particle is just its kinetic energy. (a) With this assumption, show that the classical particle velocityvparticleis2E/p. (b) Show that this velocity and that of the matter wave differ by a factor of 2. (c) In reality, a massive object also has internal energy, no matter how slowly it moves, and its total energyEismc2, where=1/1-(vparticle/c)2.Show thatvparticleispc2/Eand thatvwaveisc2/vparticleIs there anything wrong with itvwave? (The issue is discussed further in Chapter 6.)

In Exercise 45, the case is made that the position uncertainty for a typical macroscopic object is generally so much smaller than its actual physical dimensions that applying the uncertainty principle would be absurd. Here we gain same idea of how small an object would have鈾 to be before quantum mechanics might rear its head. The density of aluminum is 2.7103kg/m3, is typical of solids and liquids around us. Suppose we could narrow down the velocity of an aluminum sphere to within an uncertainty of1mper decade. How small would it have to be for its position uncertainty to be at least as large as110%of its radius?

In the hydrogen atom, the electron鈥檚 orbit, not necessarily circular, extends to a distance of a about an angstrom (1脜=0.1鈥塶尘)from the proton. If it is to move about as a compact classical particle in the region where it is confined, the electron鈥檚 wavelength had better always be much smaller than an angstrom. Here we investigate how large might be the electron鈥檚 wavelength. If orbiting as a particle, its speed at 1脜could be no faster than that for circular orbit at that radius. Why? Find the corresponding wavelength and compare it to1脜 . Can the atom be treated classically?

Determine the Compton wavelength of the electron, defined to be the wavelength it would have if its momentum weremec.

(a) What is the range of possible wavelengths for a neutron corresponding to a range of speeds from 鈥渢hermal鈥 at300K(see Exercise) to0.01c.(b) Repeat part (a), but with reference to an electron.(c) For this range of speeds, what range of dimensions D would reveal the wave nature of a neutron? Of an electron?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.