/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q8CQ Suppose we have a system of iden... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose we have a system of identical particles moving in just one dimension and for which the energy quantization relationship isE=bn2/3, wherebis a constant andan integer quantum number. Discuss whether the density of states should be independent ofE, an increasing function ofE, or a decreasing function ofE.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Based on our above expression for D(E), the density of states is thus an increasing function ofE . More accurately, the density of states is directly proportional to E1/2.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:

In this problem, we are given the relationship between the energyEand the quantum staten:

E=bn2/3,

Whereb is constant. Our task is to determine whether the density of states D(E)is increasing, decreasing, or independent of E.

02

express  n in terms of E

Given the quantized energy equation above, let us first express nin terms of E:

E=bn2/3n2/3=Ebn=(Eb)3/2

03

expression for the density of states D(E)

Now that we have nin terms ofE, let us take the derivative of both sides:

d(n)=d(Eb)3/2dn=32E1/2b3/2dE=32Eb3dE

Dividing both sides by dEwe obtain the expression for the density of states D(E)associated with the energy relation above:

dndE=32Eb3dEdE=32Eb3D(E)=32Eb3

04

density is a increasing function

Based on our above expression for D(E), the density of states is thus an increasing function of E. More accurately, the density of states is directly proportional to E1/2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to Wien's law, the wavelengthλmaxat which the thermal emission of electromagnetic energy from a body of temperatureTis maximum obeysλmaxT=2.898×10−3m⋅K.Show that this law follows from equation (9-47). To do this. Usef=c/λto expressin terms ofλrather than f, then obtain an expression that, when solved, would yield the wavelength at which this function is maximum. The transcendental equation cannot be solved exactly, so it is enough to show thatλ=(2.898×10−3m⋅K)/T solves it to a reasonable degree of precision.

The diagram shows two systems that may exchange both thermal and mechanical energy via a movable, heat-conducting partition. Because both Eand Vmay change. We consider the entropy of each system to be a function of both:S(E,V). Considering the exchange of thermal energy only, we argued in Section 9.2 that was reasonable to define1TasδSδE. In the more general case, PTis also defined as something.

a) Why should pressure come into play, and to what mightPTbe equated.

b) Given this relationship, show thatdS=dQT(Remember the first law of thermodynamics.)

This problem investigates what fraction of the available charge must be transferred from one conductor to another to produce a typical contact potential. (a) As a rough approximation treat the conductors as10cmx 10 cm square plates2cm apart-a parallel-plate capacitors so thatq=CV , where C=σ0(0.01m2/0.02m). How much charge must be transferred from one plate to the other to produce a potential difference of 2V?(b) Approximately what fraction would this be of the total number of conduction electrons in a 100gpiece of copper. which has one conduction electron per atom?

We claim that the famous exponential decrease of probability with energy is natural, the vastly most probable and disordered state given the constraints on total energy and number of particles. It should be a state of maximum entropy ! The proof involves mathematical techniques beyond the scope of the text, but finding support is good exercise and not difficult. Consider a system of11oscillators sharing a total energy of just5³óÓ¬0 . In the symbols of Section 9.3. N=11andM=5 .

  1. Using equation(9-9) , calculate the probabilities ofn , being0,1,2, and3 .
  2. How many particlesNn , would be expected in each level? Round each to the nearest integer. (Happily. the number is still 11. and the energy still5³óÓ¬0 .) What you have is a distribution of the energy that is as close to expectations is possible. given that numbers at each level in a real case are integers.
  3. Entropy is related to the number of microscopic ways the macro state can be obtained. and the number of ways of permuting particle labels withN0 ,N1,N2 , and N3fixed and totaling11 is11!(N0!N1!N2!N3!) . (See Appendix J for the proof.) Calculate the number of ways for your distribution.
  4. Calculate the number of ways if there were6 particles inn=0.5 inn=1 and none higher. Note that this also has the same total energy.
  5. Find at least one other distribution in which the 11 oscillators share the same energy, and calculate the number of ways.
  6. What do your finding suggests?

Obtain an order-of-magnitude value for the temperature at which helium might begin to exhibit quantum/ superfluid behaviour. See equation (9.43). (Helium's specific gravity is about 0.12.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.