/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q79CE Sketch the wave function. Is it ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Sketch the wave function. Is it smooth?

ψ(x)={2a3xe-axX>00X<0

Short Answer

Expert verified

The diagram for the variation of with is given below.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the concept of wave functions.

In quantum physics, a wave function is a variable number that mathematically characterises a particle's wave properties. The value of a particle's wave function at a given place in space and time is proportional to the probability of the particle being there at that time.

02

Applying the concept of wave function.

Description of motion of a particle in quantum mechanics is described by wave function, which is a function of both position and time. The wave function is continuous in nature and it satisfied the Schrödinger equation.

Write the expression of the wave function of a particle for x > 0.

Ψ(x)=2a3xe-ax

Write the expression of the wave function of a particle for x < 0.

Ψ(x)=0

Draw a diagram to show the variation of ψx with x.

03

Draw the diagram to show the variation.

Draw a diagram to show the variation of ψxwith x.

As the potential energy is infinite for infinite well, so the derivative of the wave function is discontinuous. Thus the curve for variation of Ψ(x)with x has positive slope at right and negative slope at left.

Thus, the diagram for the variation of Ψ(x)with x is given above.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Section 5.5, it was shown that the infinite well energies follow simply fromλ=hp the formula for kinetic energy, p2/2m; and a famous standing-wave condition, λ=2L/N. The arguments are perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0(inside the well) and L is strictly constant, but they can also be useful in other cases. The length L allowed the wave should be roughly the distance between the classical turning points, where there is no kinetic energy left. Apply these arguments to the oscillator potential energy, U(x)=12kx2.Find the location x of the classical turning point in terms of E; use twice this distance for L; then insert this into the infinite well energy formula, so that appears on both sides. Thus far, the procedure really only deals with kinetic energy. Assume, as is true for a classical oscillator, that there is as much potential energy, on average, as kinetic energy. What do you obtain for the quantized energies?

For a total energy of 0, the potential energy is given in Exercise 96. (a) Given these, to what region of the x-axis would a classical particle be restricted? Is the quantum-mechanical particle similarly restricted? (b) Write an expression for the probability that the (quantum-mechanical) particle would be found in the classically forbidden region, leaving it in the form of an integral. (The integral cannot be evaluated in closed form.)

A bound particle of massdescribed by the wave function

ψ(³æ)=´¡³æ±ð-x2/2b2

What is the most probable location at which to find the particle?

A study of classical waves tells us that a standing wave can be expressed as a sum of two travelling waves. Quantum-Mechanical travelling waves, discussed in Chapter 4, is of the form ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx=Ӭt). Show that the infinite well’s standing wave function can be expressed as a sum of two traveling waves.

Equation 5-16 gives infinite well energies. Because equation 5-22 cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.