Chapter 5: Q79CE (page 193)
Sketch the wave function. Is it smooth?
Short Answer
The diagram for the variation of with is given below.

/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 5: Q79CE (page 193)
Sketch the wave function. Is it smooth?
The diagram for the variation of with is given below.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
In Section 5.5, it was shown that the infinite well energies follow simply from the formula for kinetic energy, p2/2m; and a famous standing-wave condition, . The arguments are perfectly valid when the potential energy is 0(inside the well) and L is strictly constant, but they can also be useful in other cases. The length L allowed the wave should be roughly the distance between the classical turning points, where there is no kinetic energy left. Apply these arguments to the oscillator potential energy, .Find the location x of the classical turning point in terms of E; use twice this distance for L; then insert this into the infinite well energy formula, so that appears on both sides. Thus far, the procedure really only deals with kinetic energy. Assume, as is true for a classical oscillator, that there is as much potential energy, on average, as kinetic energy. What do you obtain for the quantized energies?
For a total energy of 0, the potential energy is given in Exercise 96. (a) Given these, to what region of the x-axis would a classical particle be restricted? Is the quantum-mechanical particle similarly restricted? (b) Write an expression for the probability that the (quantum-mechanical) particle would be found in the classically forbidden region, leaving it in the form of an integral. (The integral cannot be evaluated in closed form.)
A bound particle of massdescribed by the wave function
What is the most probable location at which to find the particle?
A study of classical waves tells us that a standing wave can be expressed as a sum of two travelling waves. Quantum-Mechanical travelling waves, discussed in Chapter 4, is of the form . Show that the infinite well’s standing wave function can be expressed as a sum of two traveling waves.
Equation gives infinite well energies. Because equation cannot be solved in closed form, there is no similar compact formula for finite well energies. Still many conclusions can be drawn without one. Argue on largely qualitative grounds that if the walls of a finite well are moved close together but not changed in height, then the well must progressively hold fewer bound states. (Make a clear connection between the width of the well and the height of the walls).
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.