/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3CQ The term interaction is sometime... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The term interaction is sometimes used interchangeably with force, and other times interchangeably with potential energy. Although force and potential energy certainly aren't the same thing, what justification is there for using the same term to cover both?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Because force and potential energy often represent the same thing that is causing the particle to move.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The force and the potential energy of the particle are both related if the force is a conservative force.

02

Concept of vector gradient of potential energy 

If the force is conservative it can be defined as negative of the vector gradient of the potential energy:

F=-U

03

Conservative Force

If the force is conservative (energy of the particle is conserved under the application of the force if the particle moves in a closed loop or, the change in energy of the particle is zero when it returns to its original position under the application of the force), it can be defined as negative of the vector gradient of the potential energy:

F=-U

So, the force and the potential energy of the particle are both related if the force is a conservative force. If we know the potential energy, we know the force and if we know the force, we know the potential energy (only upto a constant but it does not matter because zero of the potential energy can be defined anywhere). And in physics, we often work with conservative forces, for example: gravitational force, electromagnetic force, spring force etc.

04

Gravitational potential energy

So, the two are analogous and therefore the term interaction is used to cover both of them. For example, while working with gravity, whether we say "the gravitational force acting on a particle at a particular point in space is this much" or "the gravitational potential energy of the particle at that particular point in space is that much", both the statements describe the same phenomenon.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The product of uncertainties in particle's momentum and position.

Consider the wave function that is a combination of two different infinite well stationary states the nth and the mth

x,t=12nxe-iEn/t+12me-iEm/t

  1. Show that the x,tis properly normalized.
  2. Show that the expectation value of the energy is the average of the two energies:E=12En+Em
  3. Show that the expectation value of the square of the energy is given by .
  4. Determine the uncertainty in the energy.

Consider the delta well potential energy:

U(x)={0x0-x=0

Although not completely realistic, this potential energy is often a convenient approximation to a verystrong, verynarrow attractive potential energy well. It has only one allowed bound-state wave function, and because the top of the well is defined as U = 0, the corresponding bound-state energy is negative. Call its value -E0.

(a) Applying the usual arguments and required continuity conditions (need it be smooth?), show that the wave function is given by

(x)=(2mE0h2)1/4e-(2mE0/)|x|

(b) Sketch (x)and U(x) on the same diagram. Does this wave function exhibit the expected behavior in the classically forbidden region?

Explain to your friend, who is skeptical about energy quantization, the simple evidence provided by distinct colors you see when you hold a CD (serving as grating) near a fluorescent light. It may be helpful to contrast this evidence with the spectrum produced by an incandescent light, which relies on heating to produce a rather nonspecific blackbody spectrum.

Figure 5.15 shows that the allowed wave functions for a finite well whose depth U0was chosen to be62/mL2.

(a) Insert this value in equation (5-23), then using a calculator or computer, solve for the allowed value of kL, of which there are four.

(b) Usingk=2mEfind corresponding values of E. Do they appear to agree with figure 5.15?

(c) Show that the chosenU0implies that 122L2k2.

(d) DefiningLandCto be 1 for convenience, plug your KLand values into the wave function given in exercise 46, then plot the results. ( Note: Your first and third KLvalues should correspond to even function of z, thus using the form withCOSKZ, while the second and forth correspond to odd functions. Do the plots also agree with Figure 5.15?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.