/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6Q Explain briefly why the attracti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Explain briefly why the attraction between a point charge and a dipole has a different distance dependence for induced dipoles (1/r5 ) than for permanent dipoles (1/r3 ). (You need not explain either situation in full detail: just explain why there is this difference in their behavior.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The attraction between a point charge and a dipole has a different distance dependence for induced dipoles (1/r5) than for permanent dipoles (1/r3) due to the difference in the nature of the force exerted by the dipoles.

Step by step solution

01

Attraction between a point charge and different types of dipole

When two opposite charges approach each other, they experience anout of attraction that is given by the Coulomb force, depending on the induced nature of the charge and intensity, the attraction will begin to feel more or less between the charges.

02

Reasons for different behavior 

In the case of the attraction between a charge and the permanent dipole, the distance dependence is represented as 1/r3 , and the attraction between a charge and an induced dipole as 1/r5.

In the case of permanent dipoles, the attractive force is shorter than that of induced dipoles because the distortion that occurs due to the point charge is not permanent and happens for a very short period of time. The dipole will find the previous equilibrium, and the attraction will not be there between the permanent dipole and the point charge. But the induced dipole will remain in the same distorted condition as long as the external influence is there.

Thus, the attraction between a point charge and a dipole has a different distance dependence for induced dipoles (1/r5) than for permanent dipoles (1/r3).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain briefly why repulsion is a better test for the sign of a charged object than attraction is.

A point charge of 3109鈥塁is located at the origin.

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0鈥尘?

(b) Next, a short, straight, thin copper wire 3鈥尘mlong is placed along the x axis with its center at location 0.1,0,0鈥尘. What is the approximate change in the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0鈥尘?

(c) Does the magnitude of the electric field at location 0.2,0,0鈥尘 increase or decrease as a result of placing the copper wire between this location and the point charge?

(d) Does the copper metal block the electric field contributed by the point charge?

Criticize the following statement: 鈥淲hen you rub your finger along the slick side of a U tape, the excess charges flow onto your finger, and this discharges the tape.鈥 Draw diagrams illustrating a more plausible explanation.

A glass sphere carrying a uniformly distributed charge of +Qis surrounded by an initially neutral spherical plastic shell (Figure 15.67).

(a) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the plastic. (b) Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the inner glass sphere. Explain briefly. (c) Is the electric field at location P outside the plastic shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the plastic weren鈥檛 there? Explain briefly. (d) Now suppose that the glass sphere carrying a uniform charge of +Qis surrounded by an initially neutral metal shell (Figure 15.68). Qualitatively, indicate the polarization of the metal.

e) Now be quantitative about the polarization of the metal sphere and prove your assertions. (f) Is the electric field at location P outside the metal shell larger, smaller, or the same as it would be if the metal shell weren鈥檛 there? Explain briefly.

A small glass ball is rubbed all over with a small silk cloth and acquires a charge of +5nC. The silk cloth and the glass ball are placed 30 cm apart.

(a) On a diagram like that shown in Figure 14.71, draw the electric field vectors qualitatively at the locations marked 脳. Pay careful attention to directions and to relative magnitudes. Use dashed lines to explain your reasoning graphically, and draw the final electric field vectors with solid lines.

(b) Next, a neutral block of copper is placed between the silk and the glass.

On a diagram like that shown in Figure 14.72, carefully show the approximate charge distribution for the copper block and the electric field vectors inside the copper at the locations marked 脳.

(c) The copper block is replaced by a neutral block of plastic. Carefully show the approximate molecular polarization of the plastic block at the locations marked 脳 in Figure 14.73.

(d) Even if you have to state your result as an inequality, make as quantitative a statement as you can about the electric field at the location of the glass ball and the net force on the ball when the plastic block is in place compared to when there is no block. Explain briefly.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.