Chapter 20: Problem 30
Cite the differences between type I and type II superconductors.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 20: Problem 30
Cite the differences between type I and type II superconductors.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Confirm that there are \(1.72\) Bohr magnetons associated with each cobalt atom, given that the saturation magnetization is \(1.45 \times 10^{6} \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\), that cobalt has an HCP crystal structure with an atomic radius of \(0.1253 \mathrm{~nm}\) and a \(c / a\) ratio of \(1.623\).
A ferromagnetic material has a remanence of \(1.0\) tesla and a coercivity of \(15,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\). Saturation is achieved at a magnetic field strength of \(25,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\), at which the flux density is \(1.25\) teslas. Using these data, sketch the entire hysteresis curve in the range \(H=-25,000\) to \(+25,000 \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\). Be sure to scale and label both coordinate axes.
The magnetic flux density within a bar of some material is \(0.630\) tesla at an \(H\) field of \(5 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~A} / \mathrm{m}\). Compute the following for this material: (a) the magnetic permeability and (b) the magnetic susceptibility. (c) What type(s) of magnetism would you suggest is (are) being displayed by this material? Why?
It is possible to express the magnetic susceptibility \(\chi_{m}\) in several different units. For the discussion in this chapter, \(\chi_{m}\) is used to designate the volume susceptibility in SI units-that is, the quantity that gives the magnetization per unit volume \(\left(\mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) of material when multiplied by \(H\). The mass susceptibility \(\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg})\) yields the magnetic moment (or magnetization) per kilogram of material when multiplied by \(H\); similarly, the atomic susceptibility \(\chi_{m}\) (a) gives the magnetization per kilogram-mole. The last two quantities are related to \(\chi_{m}\) through the following relationships: $$ \begin{aligned} &\chi_{m}=\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg}) \times \text { mass density }\left(\text { in } \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right) \\ &\chi_{m}(a)=\chi_{m}(\mathrm{~kg}) \times \text { atomic weight }(\text { in } \mathrm{kg}) \end{aligned} $$ When using the cgs-emu system, comparable parameters exist that may be designated by \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}\), \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}(\mathrm{g})\), and \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}(a) ;\) the \(\chi_{m}\) and \(\chi_{m}^{\prime}\) are related in accordance with Table 20.1. From Table 20.2, \(\chi_{m}\) for copper is \(-0.96 \times 10^{-5}\); convert this value into the other five susceptibilities.
A net magnetic moment is associated with each atom in paramagnetic and ferromagnetic materials. Explain why ferromagnetic materials can be magnetized permanently, whereas paramagnetic ones cannot.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.