/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 Find the allowed energies of the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Find the allowed energies of the balf harmonic oscillator $$V(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} (1 / 2) m \omega^{2} x^{2}, & x >0 \\ \infty, & x < 0 \end{array}\right.$$ (This represents, for example, a spring that can be stretched, but not compressed.) Hint: This requires some careful thought, but very little actual calculation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Allowed energies correspond to odd-numbered quantum states: \(E_{n} = (n + \frac{1}{2}) \hbar \omega\) for odd \(n = 1, 3, 5, \ldots\).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the potential

The given potential is a half-harmonic oscillator where the harmonic potential \(V(x) = (1/2)m\omega^2 x^2\) is only valid for \(x > 0\). The potential is infinite for \(x < 0\), meaning the particle cannot exist in regions where \(x < 0\). This condition implies that the wave function must be zero for \(x \leq 0\).
02

Quantum conditions on wave functions

For \(x > 0\), the system behaves like the standard harmonic oscillator. The solution involves solving the Schrödinger equation, and for a complete harmonic oscillator, this yields energy levels described by \(E_n = (n + \frac{1}{2}) \hbar \omega\), where \(n\) is a non-negative integer. However, these solutions must satisfy boundary conditions specific to the half-harmonic potential.
03

Applying boundary conditions

Since the wave function must be zero at \(x = 0\), this imposes restrictions on the solutions. For the harmonic oscillator solutions, odd \(n\) states (e.g., \(n = 1, 3, 5, \ldots\)) are always zero at \(x = 0\). Hence, for the half-harmonic oscillator, only odd \(n\) solutions are valid, as they inherently satisfy the boundary condition.
04

Determining the allowed energies

Because only odd \(n\) states are allowed, the energies for the half-harmonic oscillator correspond to these odd states. Thus, the allowed energies are given by \(E_{n} = (n + \frac{1}{2}) \hbar \omega\) for odd \(n\), which are \(n = 1, 3, 5, \ldots\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Energy Quantization
In the realm of quantum mechanics, energy quantization refers to the fact that a system can only possess certain discrete energy levels. Unlike classical systems where energy is continuous, quantum systems, like our half-harmonic oscillator, have specified "quantized" energy values.
For the half-harmonic oscillator, the potential energy function changes how the energy levels are structured. Since the potential is infinite for negative values of x, the particle cannot exist there, confining it to positive values only.
This constraint on space alters the typical quantization pattern observed in the complete quantum harmonic oscillator.
Typically, the full harmonic oscillator's energy levels are given by the formula, \[ E_n = \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \hbar \omega \] where \( n \) can be 0, 1, 2, and so forth.
However, due to boundary conditions that arise from our half-harmonic setup, energy levels are further restricted.
Only odd quantum numbers contribute, as we can only have energy levels like 1, 3, 5, etc., because these satisfy necessary conditions at specific boundaries.
Thus, energy quantization not only depends on quantum rules but also on system-specific boundary conditions.
Wave Function Boundary Conditions
Wave function boundary conditions play a crucial role in determining the permissible solutions for a quantum system. In the case of the half-harmonic oscillator, the potential becomes infinite for \( x < 0 \), effectively "trapping" the particle in the region \( x > 0 \).
This has significant implications for the wave function, which describes the particle's behavior in space.
  • The wave function must be zero for \( x \leq 0 \), essentially cutting off any probability of finding the particle there.
  • This boundary condition impacts the possible forms of wave functions, requiring them to vanish at the point \( x = 0 \).
In a full quantum harmonic oscillator, both even and odd solutions are viable since the boundary conditions allow for both types. However, the half-harmonic setup uniquely restricts allowed solutions, only permitting those wave functions which are inherently zero at \( x = 0 \).
This forces the selection of wave functions corresponding to odd quantum numbers, which meet these conditions naturally. Such conditions drastically alter the nature of permissible quantum states.
Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
The quantum harmonic oscillator is one of the cornerstone models in quantum mechanics, capturing the essence of oscillating systems. It beautifully illustrates concepts like quantized energy levels and the nature of wave functions. In our half-harmonic oscillator scenario, some key insights from the full model still apply, while others adapt to new constraints.
  • The quantum harmonic oscillator's potential, \( V(x) = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2x^2 \), describes a system where a particle experiences a restoring "force" that tries to return it to an equilibrium position, much like a spring system in classical mechanics.
  • In the full oscillator, this potential allows vibrations about a central point with energy states defined by \( E_n = \left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right) \hbar \omega \).
Yet, in the half-harmonic oscillator, the presence of an infinite potential barrier at \( x = 0 \) changes the dynamics.
Only high-energy quantum states (those relating to odd numbered quantum states) are viable, leaving half of the solutions unsuitable.
These adaptations provide a unique insight into how constraints and boundary conditions can drastically affect a quantum system's behavior, revealing the nuanced interplay between potential energy and quantum states.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In this problem you will show that the number of nodes of the stationary states of a one-dimensional potential always increases with energy. 58 Consider two (real, normalized) solutions \(\left(\psi_{n} \text { and } \psi_{m}\right)\) to the timeindependent Schrödinger equation (for a given potential \(V(x)\) ), with energies \(E_{n}>E_{m}.\) (a) Show that $$\frac{d}{d x}\left(\frac{d \psi_{m}}{d x} \psi_{n}-\psi_{m} \frac{d \psi_{n}}{d x}\right)=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}\left(E_{n}-E_{m}\right) \psi_{m} \psi_{n}.$$ (b) Let \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) be two adjacent nodes of the function \(\psi_{m}(x) .\) Show that $$\psi_{m}^{\prime}\left(x_{2}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{2}\right)-\psi_{m}^{\prime}\left(x_{1}\right) \psi_{n}\left(x_{1}\right)=\frac{2 m}{\hbar^{2}}\left(E_{n}-E_{m}\right) \int_{x_{1}}^{x_{2}} \psi_{m} \psi_{n} d x.$$ (c) If \(\psi_{n}(x)\) has no nodes between \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2},\) then it must have the same sign everywhere in the interval. Show that (b) then leads to a contradiction. Therefore, between every pair of nodes of \(\psi_{m}(x), \psi_{n}(x)\) must have at least one node, and in particular the number of nodes increases with energy.

Suppose $$V(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}m g x, & x>0, \\\\\infty, & x \leq 0.\end{array}\right.$$ (a) Solve the (time-independent) Schrödinger equation for this potential. Hint: First convert it to dimensionless form: \(-y^{\prime \prime}(z)+z y(z)=\epsilon y(z)\) by letting \(z \equiv a x\) and \(y(z) \equiv(1 / \sqrt{a}) \psi(x)\) (the \(\sqrt{a}\) is just so \(y(z)\) is normalized with respect to \(z\) when \(\psi(x)\) is normalized with respect to \(x\) ) What are the constants \(a\) and \(\varepsilon\) ? Actually, we might as well set \(a \rightarrow 1-\) this amounts to a convenient choice for the unit of length. Find the general solution to this equation (in Mathematica DSolve will do the job). The result is (of course) a linear combination of two (probably unfamiliar) functions. Plot each of them, for \((-15

Evaluate the following integrals: (a) \(\int_{-3}^{+1}\left(x^{3}-3 x^{2}+2 x-1\right) \delta(x+2) d x.\) (b) \(\int_{0}^{\infty}[\cos (3 x)+2] \delta(x-\pi) d x.\) (c) \(\int_{-1}^{+1} \exp (|x|+3) \delta(x-2) d x.\)

The \(1 / x^{2}\) potential. Suppose $$V(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}-\alpha / x^{2}, & x>0, \\ \infty, & x \leq 0.\end{array}\right.$$ where \(a\) is some positive constant with the appropriate dimensions. We'd like to find the bound states-solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation $$-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m} \frac{d^{2} \psi}{d x^{2}}-\frac{\alpha}{x^{2}} \psi=E \psi$$ with negative energy \((E<0)\) (a) Let's first go for the ground state energy, \(E_{0}\). Prove, on dimensional grounds, that there is no possible formula for \(E_{0}\) -no way to construct (from the available constants \(m, \hbar,\) and \(\alpha\) ) a quantity with the units of energy. That's weird, but it gets worse \(\ldots .\) (b) For convenience, rewrite Equation 2.190 as $$\frac{d^{2} \psi}{d x^{2}}+\frac{\beta}{x^{2}} \psi=\kappa^{2} \psi, \text { where } \beta \equiv \frac{2 m \alpha}{\hbar^{2}} \text { and } \kappa \equiv \frac{\sqrt{-2 m E}}{\hbar}.$$ Show that if \(\psi(x)\) satisfies this equation with energy \(E\), then so too does \(\psi(\lambda x),\) with energy \(E^{\prime}=\lambda^{2} E,\) for any positive number \(\lambda .[\) This is a catastrophe: if there exists any solution at all, then there's a solution for every (negative) energy! Unlike the square well, the harmonic oscillator, and every other potential well we have encountered, there are no discrete allowed states - and no ground state. A system with no ground state-no lowest allowed energy-would be wildly unstable, cascading down to lower and lower levels, giving off an unlimited amount of energy as it falls. It might solve our energy problem, but we'd all be fried in the process.] Well, perhaps there simply are no solutions at all \(\ldots .\) (c) (Use a computer for the remainder of this problem.) Show that $$\psi_{\kappa}(x)=A \sqrt{x} K_{i g}(\kappa x),$$ satisfies Equation 2.191 (here \(K_{i g}\) is the modified Bessel function of order \(i g,\) and \(g \equiv \sqrt{\beta-1 / 4}\) ). Plot this function, for \(g=4\) (you might as well let \(_{K}=1\) for the graph; this just sets the scale of length). Notice that it goes to 0 as \(x \rightarrow 0\) and as \(x \rightarrow \infty\). And it's normalizable: determine \(A\). How about the old rule that the number of nodes counts the number of lower-energy states? This function has an infinite number of nodes, regardless of the energy (i.e. of \(\kappa\) ). I guess that's consistent, since for any \(E\) there are always an infinite number of states with even lower energy. (d) This potential confounds practically everything we have come to expect. The problem is that it blows up too violently as \(x \rightarrow 0\). If you move the "brick wall" over a hair, $$V(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}-\alpha / x^{2}, & x>\epsilon>0, \\\\\infty, & x \leq, \epsilon \end{array}\right.$$ it's suddenly perfectly normal. Plot the ground state wave function, for \(g=4\) and \(\epsilon=1\) (you'll first need to determine the appropriate value of \(\kappa\) ), from \(x=0\) to \(x=6 .\) Notice that we have introduced a new parameter \((\epsilon),\) with the dimensions of length, so the argument in (a) is out the window. Show that the ground state energy takes the form $$E_{0}=-\frac{\alpha}{\epsilon^{2}} f(\beta),$$ for some function \(f\) of the dimensionless quantity \(\beta,\)

Delta functions live under integral signs, and two expressions \(\left(D_{1}(x) \text { and } D_{2}(x)\right)\) involving delta functions are said to be equal if $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(x) D_{1}(x) d x=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(x) D_{2}(x) d x,$$ for every (ordinary) function \(f(x).\) (a) Show that $$\delta(c x)=\frac{1}{|c|} \delta(x).$$ where \(c\) is a real constant. (Be sure to check the case where \(c\) is negative.) (b) \(\operatorname{Let} \theta(x)\) be the step function: $$\theta(x) \equiv\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}1, & x>0 \\\0, & x<0\end{array}\right.$$ (In the rare case where it actually matters, we define \(\theta(0)\) to be \(1 / 2\).) Show that \(d \theta / d x=\delta(x).\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.