/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 The gaussian wave packet. A free... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The gaussian wave packet. A free particle has the initial wave function \(\Psi(x, 0)=A e^{-a x^{2}}\) where \(A\) and \(a\) are (real and positive) constants. (a) Normalize \(\Psi(x, 0)\) (b) Find \(\Psi(x, t)\). Hint: Integrals of the form $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-\left(a x^{2}+b x\right)} d x$$ can be handled by "completing the square": Let \(y \equiv \sqrt{a}[x+(b / 2 a)]\) and note that \(\left(a x^{2}+b x\right)=y^{2}-\left(b^{2} / 4 a\right) .\) Answer (c) Find \(|\Psi(x, t)|^{2}\). Express your answer in terms of the quantity \(w \equiv \sqrt{a /\left[1+(2 \hbar a t / m)^{2}\right]}\) Sketch \(|\Psi|^{2}(\text { as a function of } x)\) at \(t=0,\) and again for some very large \(t\) Qualitatively, what happens to \(|\Psi|^{2},\) as time goes on? (d) \(\quad\) Find \(\langle x\rangle,\langle p\rangle,\left\langle x^{2}\right\rangle,\left\langle p^{2}\right\rangle, \sigma_{x},\) and \(\sigma_{p} .\) Partial answer: \(\left\langle p^{2}\right\rangle=a \hbar^{2},\) but it may take some algebra to reduce it to this simple form. (e) Does the uncertainty principle hold? At what time \(t\) does the system come closest to the uncertainty limit?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The Gaussian wave packet broadens over time, verifying the uncertainty principle and reaching minimum uncertainty at \( t=0 \).

Step by step solution

01

Normalize the Initial Wave Function

To normalize the wave function \( \Psi(x, 0) = A e^{-a x^2} \), we need to ensure that \( \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |\Psi(x, 0)|^2 \, dx = 1 \). Substituting the given wave function:\[ |\Psi(x, 0)|^2 = A^2 e^{-2ax^2} \]Using the Gaussian integral \( \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-\alpha x^2} \, dx = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\alpha}} \), we find:\[ A^2 \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-2ax^2} \, dx = A^2 \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}} = 1 \]Solving for \( A \), we get:\[ A = \left(\frac{2a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4} \]
02

Find the Time-Dependent Wave Function

The wave function \( \Psi(x, t) \) can be found by applying the time evolution of a free particle, which involves the Fourier transform of \( \Psi(x, 0) \). After some complex algebra involving the Fourier transform, finding the phase factor, and completing the square, we have:\[ \Psi(x, t) = \left(\frac{a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{2i\hbar at}{m}}} \exp\left(-\frac{ax^2}{1+\frac{2i\hbar at}{m}}\right) \]
03

Compute the Probability Density

The probability density \( |\Psi(x, t)|^2 \) is given by the square of the modulus of \( \Psi(x, t) \):\[ |\Psi(x, t)|^2 = \left(\frac{a}{\pi}\right)^{1/2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+(\frac{2\hbar at}{m})^2}} \exp\left(-\frac{2ax^2}{1+(\frac{2\hbar at}{m})^2}\right) \]In terms of \( w = \sqrt{a/[1+(2\hbar at/m)^2]} \), this can be rewritten as:\[ |\Psi(x, t)|^2 = \left(\frac{w}{\pi}\right)^{1/2} \exp(-wx^2) \]
04

Analyze the Behavior of |\Psi|^2

The sketch of \( |\Psi(x, t)|^2 \) as a function of \( x \) at \( t = 0 \) shows a narrow Gaussian peak. As \( t \to \infty \), \( |\Psi(x, t)|^2 \) broadens, indicating the spreading of the wave packet. With increasing time, the wave packet's width grows, and its peak height decreases.
05

Calculate Expectation Values and Uncertainties

\( \langle x \rangle = 0 \) because \( \Psi(x, t) \) is an even function, so it is centered at zero. \( \langle p \rangle = 0 \) as momentum expectation is initially zero in this symmetric potential.The expectation values \( \langle x^2 \rangle \) and \( \langle p^2 \rangle = a\hbar^2 \) are obtained from integrating \( |\Psi(x, t)|^2 \) times \( x^2 \) or \( p^2 \), with \( p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \).The uncertainties are given by: \( \sigma_x = \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle^2} \) and \( \sigma_p = \sqrt{\langle p^2 \rangle - \langle p \rangle^2} \).
06

Verify the Uncertainty Principle

The uncertainty product \( \sigma_x \sigma_p = \hbar/2 \) at \( t=0 \), confirming the uncertainty principle holds initially. As time progresses, \( \sigma_x \) grows and \( \sigma_p \) remains bounded, increasing \( \sigma_x \sigma_p \). The system comes closest to the uncertainty limit at \( t=0 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

wave function normalization
Wave function normalization ensures the probability of finding a particle somewhere on a given scale is 1, meaning the particle must exist somewhere in space. For the Gaussian wave packet \(\Psi(x, 0) = A e^{-a x^2}\), normalization requires integrating \(|\Psi(x, 0)|^2\) over all space to equal 1.

We start by finding the square of the wave function: \(|\Psi(x, 0)|^2 = A^2 e^{-2ax^2}\). Then, we integrate:
  • \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} |\Psi(x, 0)|^2 \, dx = A^2 \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-2ax^2} \, dx\).
The integral of a Gaussian function \(\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-\alpha x^2} \, dx = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\alpha}}\) helps solve this. Substituting \(\alpha = 2a\), it becomes \(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}}\). Thus, \(A^2 \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}} = 1\). Solving for \(A\), we find \(A = \left(\frac{2a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}\).

This normalization ensures that the total probability of existence of the particle in space remains constant.
time evolution in quantum mechanics
Time evolution allows us to understand how wave functions change over time in quantum mechanics. For a free particle's wave function \(\Psi(x, t)\), we use the Schrödinger equation, which describes how quantum states evolve.

To find \(\Psi(x, t)\), it involves using a Fourier transform of the initial state \(\Psi(x, 0)\), followed by adjustments with phase factors and complex algebra to simplify results. The solution unfolds as follows:
  • Start with the normalized wave function.
  • Employ the Fourier transform and complete the square method to find time dependence.
After some complex algebra, we derive:
  • \(\Psi(x, t) = \left(\frac{a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{2i\hbar at}{m}}} \exp\left(-\frac{ax^2}{1 + \frac{2i\hbar at}{m}}\right)\)
This representation shows the wave packet's dispersion over time, indicating how probability densities shift and change in the quantum context.
quantum uncertainty principle
The uncertainty principle is a fundamental concept that restricts our precise knowledge of conjugate variables like position and momentum. It essentially states that increasing the precision of one quantity inherently decreases the precision of the other.

In the Gaussian wave packet context, we calculate position and momentum uncertainties, \(\sigma_x\) and \(\sigma_p\):
  • \(\sigma_x = \sqrt{\langle x^2 \rangle - \langle x \rangle^2}\)
  • \(\sigma_p = \sqrt{\langle p^2 \rangle - \langle p \rangle^2}\)
For this wave packet, the calculus results show that \(\langle x \rangle = 0\) and \(\langle p \rangle = 0\) due to its symmetry.

At \(t=0\), the product \(\sigma_x \sigma_p = \hbar/2\), which meets the minimum boundary set by the uncertainty principle. As time progresses, \(\sigma_x\) increases while \(\sigma_p\) remains nearly constant, leading to an increase in the total product, emphasizing how uncertainty evolves over time.
expectation values in quantum mechanics
Expectation values give us averages of a physical quantity for a wave function, akin to mean values in statistics. They help us derive important properties of quantum systems.

For the Gaussian wave packet:
  • \(\langle x \rangle = 0\) because the wave function is centered due to its symmetric nature.
  • \(\langle p \rangle = 0\) as initial momentum is zero.
  • \(\langle x^2 \rangle\) and \(\langle p^2 \rangle = a\hbar^2\) are calculated through integrating \(|\Psi(x, t)|^2\) with respective \(x^2\) or \(p^2\), noting that \(p = -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\).
Since \(\langle x^2 \rangle\) contributes to \(\sigma_x\), and \(a\hbar^2\) is the important term for \(\sigma_p\), these computations indicate how both position and momentum distribution influence the wave packet's characteristics. Understanding and verifying these expectation values aid in confidently applying quantum principles to dynamic systems.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the potential $$V(x)=-\frac{\hbar^{2} a^{2}}{m} \operatorname{sech}^{2}(a x),$$ where \(a\) is a positive constant, and "sech" stands for the hyperbolic secant. (a) Graph this potential. (b) Check that this potential has the ground state $$\psi_{0}(x)=A \operatorname{sech}(a x),$$ and find its energy. Normalize \(\psi_{0},\) and sketch its graph. (c) Show that the function $$\psi_{k}(x)=A\left(\frac{i k-a \tanh (a x)}{i k+a}\right) e^{i k x},$$ (where \(k \equiv \sqrt{2 m E} / \hbar,\) as usual) solves the Schrödinger equation for any (positive) energy \(E .\) since \(\tanh z \rightarrow-1\) as \(z \rightarrow-\infty,\) \(\psi_{k}(x) \approx A e^{i k x}, \quad\) for large negative \(x.\) This represents, then, a wave coming in from the left with no accompanying reflected wave (i.e. no term \(\exp (-i k x)\) ). What is the asymptotic form of \(\psi_{k}(x)\) at large positive \(x\) ? What are \(R\) and \(T\), for this potential? Comment: This is a famous example of a reflectionless potential-every incident particle, regardless its energy, passes right through. 62.

Consider the double delta-function potential $$V(x)=-\alpha[\delta(x+a)+\delta(x-a)],$$ where \(a\) and \(a\) are positive constants. (a) Sketch this potential. (b) How many bound states does it possess? Find the allowed energies, for \(\alpha=\hbar^{2} / m a\) and for \(\alpha=\hbar^{2} / 4 m a,\) and sketch the wave functions. (c) What are the bound state energies in the limiting cases (i) \(a \rightarrow 0\) and (ii) \(a \rightarrow \infty\) (holding a fixed)? Explain why your answers are reasonable, by comparison with the single delta-function well.

Suppose $$V(x)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}m g x, & x>0, \\\\\infty, & x \leq 0.\end{array}\right.$$ (a) Solve the (time-independent) Schrödinger equation for this potential. Hint: First convert it to dimensionless form: \(-y^{\prime \prime}(z)+z y(z)=\epsilon y(z)\) by letting \(z \equiv a x\) and \(y(z) \equiv(1 / \sqrt{a}) \psi(x)\) (the \(\sqrt{a}\) is just so \(y(z)\) is normalized with respect to \(z\) when \(\psi(x)\) is normalized with respect to \(x\) ) What are the constants \(a\) and \(\varepsilon\) ? Actually, we might as well set \(a \rightarrow 1-\) this amounts to a convenient choice for the unit of length. Find the general solution to this equation (in Mathematica DSolve will do the job). The result is (of course) a linear combination of two (probably unfamiliar) functions. Plot each of them, for \((-15

The Boltzmann equation \(^{68}\) $$P(n)=\frac{1}{Z} e^{-\beta E_{n}}, \quad Z \equiv \sum_{n} e^{-\beta E_{n}}, \quad \beta \equiv \frac{1}{k_{B} T}$$ gives the probability of finding a system in the state \(n\) (with energy \(E_{n}\) ), at temperature \(T (k_{B}\) is Boltzmann's constant). Note: The probability here refers to the random thermal distribution, and has nothing to do with quantum indeterminacy. Quantum mechanics will only enter this problem through quantization of the energies \(E_{n}\) (a) Show that the thermal average of the system's energy can be written as $$\bar{E}=\sum_{n} E_{n} P(n)=-\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \ln (Z)$$ (b) For a quantum simple harmonic oscillator the index \(n\) is the familiar quantum number, and \(E_{n}=(n+1 / 2) \hbar \omega .\) Show that in this case the partition function \(Z\) is $$Z=\frac{e^{-\beta \hbar \omega / 2}}{1-e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}$$ You will need to sum a geometric series. Incidentally, for a classical simple harmonic oscillator it can be shown that \(Z\) classical \(=2 \pi /(\omega \beta)\) (c) Use your results from parts (a) and (b) to show that for the quantum oscillator $$\bar{E}=\left(\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}\right) \frac{1+e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}{1-e^{-\beta \hbar \omega}}$$ For a classical oscillator the same reasoning would give \(\bar{E}_{\text {classical }}=1 / \beta=k_{B} T\) (d) Acrystal consisting of \(N\) atoms can be thought of as a collection of \(3 N\) oscillators (each atom is attached by springs to its 6 nearest neighbors, along the \(x, y,\) and \(z\) directions, but those springs are shared by the atoms at the two ends). The heat capacity of the crystal (per atom) will therefore be $$C=3 \frac{\partial \bar{E}}{\partial T}$$ Show that (in this model) $$C=3 k_{B}\left(\frac{\theta_{E}}{T}\right)^{2} \frac{e^{\theta_{E} / T}}{\left(e^{\theta_{E} / T}-1\right)^{2}}$$ where \(\theta_{E} \equiv \hbar \omega / k_{B}\) is the so-called Einstein temperature. The same reasoning using the classical expression for \(\bar{E}\) yields \(C_{\text {classical }}=3 k_{B}\) independent of temperature. (e) Sketch the graph of \(C / k_{B}\) versus \(T / \theta_{E} .\) Your result should look something like the data for diamond in Figure 2.24 , and nothing like the classical prediction.

$$\left(1-x^{2}\right) \frac{d^{2} f}{d x^{2}}-2 x \frac{d f}{d x}+\ell(\ell+1) f=0$$ where \(\ell\) is some (non-negative) real number. (a) Assume a power series solution, $$f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n} x^{n}$$ and obtain a recursion relation for the constants \(a_{n}\) (b) Argue that unless the series truncates (which can only happen if \(\ell\) is an integer \(),\) the solution will diverge at \(x=1\) (c) When \(\ell\) is an integer, the series for one of the two linearly independent solutions (either \(f\) even or \(f\) odd depending on whether \(\ell\) is even or odd) will truncate, and those solutions are called Legendre polynomials \(P_{\ell}(x)\) Find \(P_{0}(x), P_{1}(x), P_{2}(x),\) and \(P_{3}(x)\) from the recursion relation. Leave your answer in terms of either \(a_{0}\) or \(a_{1} .^{69}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.