/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}

91Ó°ÊÓ

Calculate (x),(x2),(p),(p2),σxandσp,for the nth stationary state of the infinite square well. Check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Which state comes closest to the uncertainty limit?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For1.136h2>h2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: Define the Schrodinger equation

A differential equation that describes matter in quantum mechanics in terms of the wave-like properties of particles in a field. Its answer is related to a particle's probability density in space and time.

02

Determine the uncertainty principle

The stationary state for the infinite potential well is:

ψnx=2asin²ÔÏ€ax

Calculate all the expectation values and the variance in that values as we did in chapter one. The expectation value of the position is:

x=2a∫0a×sinnπaxdx

Using integration by parts, so we get:

x=a2

03

Determine the expectation position and momentum

The expectation for the position squared is:

⟨x2⟩=2aanπ3∫0nπy2sinydy⟨x2⟩=a213-12n2π2

The expectation value for the momentum operator is:

p=-iħ2a∫0asinnπaxcosnπaxdxp=-iħ2aanπ∫0nπsinysocydyp=0

p2=-ħ2anÏ€a2∫0asin2nÏ€axdxp2=ħπ²Ôa2p2=ħπ²Ôa2

04

Determine the variance of position and momentum

Find the variance for position and momentum:

σx=x2-x2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σx=a213-2nπ2

σp=p2-p2

Substitute the values, and we get,

σp=ħnπa

Finally, the closet state to the uncertainty limit is the state with the lowest possible energy (n = 1), where we can prove this by:

role="math" localid="1658122114260" σxσp=ħ2π23-2=1.136ħ2

And

1.136ħ2>ħ2

The uncertainty principle is satisfied.

For 1.136ħ2>ħ2n = 1 is the state that comes closest to the uncertainty limit.

The required values are:

x=a2x2=a213-12n2π2p=0p2=ħnπa2σx=a213-2nπ2σp=ħnπa

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle of mass m is in the ground state of the infinite square well (Evaluation 2.19). Suddenly the well expands to twice its original size – the right wall moving from a to 2a – leaving the wave function (momentarily) undisturbed. The energy of the particle is now measured.

  1. What is the most probable result? What is the probability of getting that result?
  2. What is the next most probable result, and what is its probability?
  3. What is the expectation value of the energy? (Hint: if you find yourself confronted with an infinite series, try another method)

In Problem 2.7 (d), you got the expectation value of the energy by summing the series in Equation 2.39, but 1 warned you (in footnote 15 not to try it the "old fashioned way,"<H>=∫Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dx, because the discontinuous first derivative ofΨ(x.0)renders the second derivative problematic. Actually, you could have done it using integration by parts, but the Dirac delta function affords a much cleaner way to handle such anomalies.

(a) Calculate the first derivative of Ψ(x.0)(in Problem 2.7), and express the answer in terms of the step function, θ(x-c1/2)defined in Equation (Don't worry about the end points-just the interior region

(b) Exploit the result of Problem 2.24(b) to write the second derivative of Ψ(x,0)in terms of the delta function.

(c) Evaluate the integral ∫Ψ(x,0)*HΨ(x,0)dxand check that you get the same answer as before.

Check the uncertainty principle for the wave function in the equation? Equation 2.129.

Evaluate the following integrals:

(a)∫-3+1(x3-3x2+2x-1)δ(x+2)dx.

(b).∫0∞[cos(3x)+2]δ(x-π)dx

(c)∫_1+1exp(lxl+3)δ(x-2)dx

Consider the potential V(x)=-h2a2msech2(ax)where a is a positive constant, and "sech" stands for the hyperbolic secant

(a) Graph this potential.

(b) Check that this potential has the ground state

ψ0(x)and find its energy. Normalize and sketch its graph.

(C)Show that the function ψ2(x)=A(ik-atanhaxik+a)ekx

(Where k=2mEihas usual) solves the Schrödinger equation for any (positive) energy E. Sincetanhz→-1asas This represents, then, a wave coming in from the left with no accompanying reflected wave (i.e., no term . What is the asymptotic formψk(x) of at large positive x? What are R and T, for this potential? Comment: This is a famous example of a reflectionless potential-every incident particle, regardless of its energy, passes right through.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.