/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q17P A particle starts out (at time t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A particle starts out (at time t=0 ) in the Nth state of the infinite square well. Now the 鈥渇loor鈥 of the well rises temporarily (maybe water leaks in, and then drains out again), so that the potential inside is uniform but time dependent:V0(t),withV0(0)=V0(T)=0.

(a) Solve for the exact cm(t), using Equation 11.116, and show that the wave function changes phase, but no transitions occur. Find the phase change, role="math" localid="1658378247097" (T), in terms of the function V0(t)

(b) Analyze the same problem in first-order perturbation theory, and compare your answers. Compare your answers.
Comment: The same result holds whenever the perturbation simply adds a constant (constant in x, that is, not in to the potential; it has nothing to do with the infinite square well, as such. Compare Problem 1.8.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)cmt2=cm02,andtherearenotransitions.T=-10TV0tdt

(b)By the First-Order perturbation theory

cNt=eit,cmt=0

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: First-Order perturbation theory

The first-Order perturbation equation includes all the terms in the Schrodinger equation H=Ethat represent the first order approximations to H,,E,This equation can be obtained by truncating H,,E,after the first order terms.

02

Step 2: (a) Solving for 

Equation 9.82

cm=-incnH'mneiEm-Ent/

Here,

H'mn=mVotn=mnV0tcm=-incnH'mneiEm-Ent/cm=-icmV0t;dcmcm=-iV0tdtIncm=-iV0t'dt'+constantccmt=cm0e-i0tV0t'dt'

鈥︹. (11.116)

.Let,

t=-10tV0t'dt;cmt=eicm0

Hence,

cmt2=cm02,andtherearenotransitions.T=-10TV0tdt

03

Step 3: (b) Analyzing the problem in the first order perturbation theory

cNt1-i0tV0t'dt=1+icmt=-i0tmNV0t'eiEm-ENt'/dt=0mNcmt-i0tH'mNt'eiEm-ENt'/dt',(mN)

The exact answer is cNt=eit,cmt=0, and they are consistent since, ei1+i to first order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the perturbation takes the form of a delta function (in time):

H^'=U^(t);

Assume thatUaa=Ubb=0,andletUab=Uba+=if ca(-)=1and cb(-)=0,

find ca(t)andcb(t),and check that lc(t)l2+lcb(t)l2=1. What is the net probability(Pabfort) that a transition occurs? Hint: You might want to treat the delta function as the limit of a sequence of rectangles.

Answer:Pab=sin2(||lh)

An electron in the n=3,l=0,m=0state of hydrogen decays by a sequence of (electric dipole) transitions to the ground state.

(a) What decay routes are open to it? Specify them in the following way:

|300|nlm|n'l'm'|100.

(b) If you had a bottle full of atoms in this state, what fraction of them would decay via each route?

(c) What is the lifetime of this state? Hint: Once it鈥檚 made the first transition, it鈥檚 no longer in the state |300\rangle鈭300鉄, so only the first step in each sequence is relevant in computing the lifetime.

Solve Equation 9.13 for the case of a time-independent perturbation, assumingthatandcheck that

. Comment: Ostensibly, this system oscillates between 鈥溾 Doesn鈥檛 this contradict my general assertion that no transitions occur for time-independent perturbations? No, but the reason is rather subtle: In this are not, and never were, Eigen states of the Hamiltonian鈥攁 measurement of the energy never yields. In time-dependent perturbation theory we typically contemplate turning on the perturbation for a while, and then turning it off again, in order to examine the system. At the beginning, and at the end,are Eigen states of the exact Hamiltonian, and only in this context does it make sense to say that the system underwent a transition from one to the other. For the present problem, then, assume that the perturbation was turned on at time t = 0, and off again at time T 鈥攖his doesn鈥檛 affect the calculations, but it allows for a more sensible interpretation of the result.

ca=-ihHabeigtcb,cb=-ihHbaeigtca 鈥(9.13).

You could derive the spontaneous emission rate (Equation 11.63) without the detour through Einstein鈥檚 A and B coefficients if you knew the ground state energy density of the electromagnetic field P0()for then it would simply be a case of stimulated emission (Equation 11.54). To do this honestly would require quantum electrodynamics, but if you are prepared to believe that the ground state consists of one photon in each classical mode, then the derivation is very simple:

(a) Replace Equation 5.111by localid="1658381580036" N0=dkand deduce P0() (Presumably this formula breaks down at high frequency, else the total "vacuum energy" would be infinite ... but that's a story for a different day.)

(b) Use your result, together with Equation 9.47, to obtain the spontaneous emission rate. Compare Equation 9.56.

In Equation 9.31 assumed that the atom is so small (in comparison to the wavelength of light) that spatial variations in the field can be ignored. The true electric field would be E(r,t)=E0cos(kr蝇t).

If the atom is centered at the origin, thenkr1 over the relevant volume,|k|=2/ sokr~r/1) and that's why we could afford to drop this term. Suppose we keep the first-order correction:

E(r,t)=E0[cos(t)+(kr)sin(t)].

The first term gives rise to the allowed (electric dipole) transitions we considered in the text; the second leads to so-called forbidden (magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole) transitions (higher powers of k.rlead to even more "forbidden" transitions, associated with higher multipole moments).

(a) Obtain the spontaneous emission rate for forbidden transitions (don't bother to average over polarization and propagation directions, though this should really be done to complete the calculation). Answer:role="math" localid="1659008133999" Rba=q250c5|a|(n^r)(k^r)|b|2.

(b) Show that for a one-dimensional oscillator the forbidden transitions go from leveln to levelrole="math" localid="1659008239387" n-2 and the transition rate (suitably averaged over n^andk^) isR=q23n(n1)15蟺系0m2c5.

(Note: Here is the frequency of the photon, not the oscillator.) Find the ratio of the "forbidden" rate to the "allowed" rate, and comment on the terminology.

(c) Show that the2S1S transition in hydrogen is not possible even by a "forbidden" transition. (As it turns out, this is true for all the higher multipoles as well; the dominant decay is in fact by two-photon emission, and the lifetime it is about a tenth of a second

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.