/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4P Derive Eq. 6.3. [Here's one way ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Derive Eq. 6.3. [Here's one way to do it: Assume the dipole is an infinitesimal square, of side E (if it's not, chop it up into squares, and apply the argument to each one). Choose axes as shown in Fig. 6.8, and calculate F = I J (dl x B) along each of the four sides. Expand B in a Taylor series-on the right side, for instance,

B=B(0,∈,z)≅B(0,0,Z)+∈∂B∂y0.0.z

For a more sophisticated method, see Prob. 6.22.]

Short Answer

Expert verified

Therefore, the equationF=∇m.B is derived.

Step by step solution

01

Write the given data from the question.

Expansion of the Taylor series,

B=B(0,∈,z)≅B(0,0,z)+∈∂B∂y0.0.z

Side of the square=∈

Current =I

Magnetic field=B

Force along each side =F

02

 Step 2: Derive the equation  F=∇m×B.

dF4Consider the square of side ∈in the plan.

The force on the element of the core,

dF1=IL×BdF1=Idyy×B0,y,0

The force on the element of the wire parallel to z axis,

dF2=Idzz^×B0,∈,z

The force on the element of the wire parallel to yaxis,

dF3=I-dy×B0,y,∈

The force on the element of the wire on zaxis,

dF4=I-dzz^×B(0,0,z)

The total force on the element loop is sum of the forces along ach side.

dF=dF1+dF2dF3+dF4

Substitute Idyy×B0,y,0for dF1,Idzz^×B0,∈,z, for localid="1657711123898" dF2,I-dy×B0,y,∈, for dF3and I-dzz^×B0,0,z for into above equation.

localid="1657711909865" dF=Idyy×B0,y,0+Idzz^×B0,y,0∈z+I-dy×Bo,y,∈+I-dzz^×B0,0,zdF=I-dyy×B0,y,∈-B0,y,0+dzz^B0,∈,z-B0,0,z…â¶Ä¦(1)

From the Taylor series,

localid="1657713074645" B0,y,0-BO,y,0=∈∂B∂zB0,∈,z-BO,0,Z=∈∂B∂y

Substitute ∈∂B∂zfor B(o,y,∈)-band ∈∂B∂yfor B0,∈,z-B0,0,zinto equation (1).

dF=I-dyy×∈∂B∂z+dzz^∈∂B∂zdF=I∈2z^×∂B∂z-y×∈∂B∂z …… (2)

The magnetic moment of the loop,

m=I∈2

Substitute for into equation (2).

dF=mz^×∂B∂y-y×∂B∂z

Noe solves the above equation,

localid="1657715061627" F=mx^yz^001∂Bx∂y∂BY∂Y∂BZ∂Y-x^yz^001∂Bx∂z∂BY∂z∂BZ∂zF=mx^-∂By∂y-y-∂Bx∂y-z^∂BZ∂zF=mx^∂By∂y+∂BZ∂z+∂Bx∂y+z^∂Bx∂z…… (3)

From the gauss law of the magnetization,

∂Bx∂x+∂By∂y+∂BZ∂z=0-∂By∂y+∂BZ∂z=∂Bx∂x

Substitute ∂Bx∂xfor-∂By∂y+∂BZ∂zinto equation (3).

F=mx^∂Bx∂x+y∂Bx∂y+z∂Bx∂zF=m∇.BXF=∇m.Bx

In the general form the above equation can be written as,

localid="1657715013642" F=∇m.B

Hence, the equationF=∇m.Bis obtained.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You are asked to referee a grant application, which proposes to determine whether the magnetization of iron is due to "Ampere" dipoles (current loops) or "Gilbert" dipoles (separated magnetic monopoles). The experiment will involve a cylinder of iron (radius Rand length L=10R), uniformly magnetized along the direction of its axis. If the dipoles are Ampere-type, the magnetization is equivalent to a surface bound current Kb=Mϕ^if they are Gilbert-type, the magnetization is equivalent to surface monopole densities σb=±Mat the two ends. Unfortunately, these two configurations produce identical magnetic fields, at exterior points. However, the interior fields are radically different-in the first case Bis in the same general direction as M, whereas in the second it is roughly opposite to M. The applicant proposes to measure this internal field by carving out a small cavity and finding the torque on a tiny compass needle placed inside.

Assuming that the obvious technical difficulties can be overcome, and that the question itself is worthy of study, would you advise funding this experiment? If so, what shape cavity would you recommend? If not, what is wrong with the proposal?

Calculate the torque exerted on the square loop shown in Fig. 6.6, due to the circular loop (assume is much larger than or ). If the square loop is free to rotate, what will its equilibrium orientation be?

Imagine two charged magnetic dipoles (charge q, dipole moment m), constrained to move on the z axis (same as Problem 6.23(a), but without gravity). Electrically they repel, but magnetically (if both m's point in the z direction) they attract.

(a) Find the equilibrium separation distance.

(b) What is the equilibrium separation for two electrons in this orientation. [Answer: 4.72x10-13m.]

(c) Does there exist, then, a stable bound state of two electrons?

Notice the following parallel:

{∇·D=0∇×E=0,ε0E=D-P(Nofreecharge)∇·B=0∇×H=0,μ0H=B-μ0M(Nofreecharge)

Thus, the transcription D→B,E→H,P→μ0M,ε0→μ0,, turns an electrostatic problem into an analogous magnetostatic one. Use this, together with your knowledge of the electrostatic results, to rederive.

(a) the magnetic field inside a uniformly magnetized sphere (Eq. 6.16);

(b) the magnetic field inside a sphere of linear magnetic material in an otherwise uniform magnetic field (Prob. 6.18);

(c) the average magnetic field over a sphere, due to steady currents within the sphere (Eq. 5.93).

A sphere of linear magnetic material is placed in an otherwise uniform magnetic field B0. Find the new field inside the sphere.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.