/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q32P Earnshaw's theorem (Prob. 3.2) s... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Earnshaw's theorem (Prob. 3.2) says that you cannot trap a charged

particle in an electrostatic field. Question:Could you trap a neutral (but polarizable) atom in an electrostatic field?

(a) Show that the force on the atom is F→=12α∇→E2

(b) The question becomes, therefore: Is it possible for E2 to have a local maximum (in a charge-free region)? In that case the force would push the atom back to its equilibrium position. Show that the answer is no. [Hint:Use Prob. 3.4(a).]

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) In the presence of an electrostatic field E→, the force on an atom with polarizability αis12α∇→E2.

(b) In a charge free region, E2 does not have local maxima.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

An atom of polarizability α is kept in an electrostatic field E→.

02

Electrostatic force on an atom

The force on an atom in an electrostatic field is

F→=a(E→.∇→)E→.....(1)

Here, αis polarizability and E→is electrostatic field.

03

Derivation of force on an atom from an electrostatic field

The gradient of square of the electrostatic field is

∇→E2=2E→×(∇→×E→)+(E→.∇→)E→

But the curl of an electrostatic field is zero. Hence

∇→E2=2E→.∇→E→

Substitute this in equation (1) and get

F→=α∇→E22

Thus, the force on the atom is 12α∇→E2.

04

Local maxima of electrostatic field

If E2has a maxima, then there is a sphere about that maxima point Psuch that for all other points P'≠P on the sphere

E→(p')<E→(p)........(2)

In the absence of any charge inside the sphere, the average field over the surface is equal to the field on the maxima, that is,

14Ï€¸é2∫E→da=E→(P).......(3)

Here, is the radius of the sphere and is the infinitesimal area element.

From equations (2) and (3) it follows

14Ï€¸é2∫E→da<14Ï€¸é2∫E→(p)daE→(p)<14Ï€¸é2∫E→(p)daE→(p)<E→(p)

This is a contradiction and hence the electrostatic field does not have a maxima.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For the bar electret of Prob. 4.11, make three careful sketches: one

of P, one of E, and one of D. Assume L is about 2a. [Hint: E lines terminate on

charges; D lines terminate on free charges.]

Calculate W,using both Eq. 4.55 and Eq. 4.58, for a sphere of radius

Rwith frozen-in uniform polarization P→ (Ex. 4.2). Comment on the discrepancy.

Which (if either) is the "true" energy of the system?

The Clausius-Mossotti equation (Prob. 4.41) tells you how to calculatethe susceptibility of a nonpolar substance, in terms of the atomic polariz-ability. The Langevin equation tells you how to calculate the susceptibility of apolar substance, in terms of the permanent molecular dipole moment p. Here's howit goes:

(a) The energy of a dipole in an external field E isu=-p··¡³¦´Ç²õθ

(Eq. 4.6), whereθ is the usual polar angle, if we orient the z axis along E.

Statistical mechanics says that for a material in equilibrium at absolute temperature

T, the probability of a given molecule having energy u is proportional to

the Boltzmann factor,

exp(-u/kT)

The average energy of the dipoles is therefore

<u>=∫ue-(u/kt)»åΩ∫e-(u/kT)»åΩ

where »åΩ=²õ¾±²Ôθ»åθ»åÏ•, and the integration is over all orientations θ:0→π;Ï•:0→2Ï€Use this to show that the polarization of a substance

containing N molecules per unit volume is

P=Np[cothpE/kT-kT/pE] (4.73)

That's the Langevin formula. Sketch as a function ofPE/KT .

(b) Notice that for large fields/low temperatures, virtually all the molecules arelined up, and the material is nonlinear. Ordinarily, however, kT is much greaterthan p E. Show that in this regime the material is linear, and calculate its susceptibility,in terms of N, p, T, and k. Compute the susceptibility of water at 20°C,and compare the experimental value in Table 4.2. (The dipole moment of wateris 6.1×10-30C·m) This is rather far off, because we have again neglected thedistinction between E and Eelse· The agreement is better in low-density gases,for which the difference between E and Eelse is negligible. Try it for water vapor

at 100°C and 1 atm.

Check the Clausius-Mossotti relation (Eq. 4.72) for the gases listed in Table 4.1. (Dielectric constants are given in Table 4.2.) (The densities here are so small that Eqs. 4.70 and 4.72 are indistinguishable. For experimental data that confirm the Clausius-Mossotti correction term see, for instance, the first edition of Purcell's Electricity and Magnetism, Problem 9.28.)

A dielectric cube of side a,centered at the origin, carries a "frozen in"

polarization p→=kr→, where kis a constant. Find all the bound charges, and check

that they add up to zero.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.