/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 130 What is a practical way of check... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What is a practical way of checking if the discretization error has been significant in calculations?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: A practical way to check if the discretization error is significant in calculations is to compare the results obtained from calculations with varying levels of discretization and observe if the output stabilizes as the number of discrete points increases. If the output stabilizes within a reasonable range, it indicates the discretization error is not significant in the calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the discretization process

Discretization error arises when a continuous domain is approximated by dividing it into a finite number of discrete points. In many calculations, particularly in numerical methods, it is necessary to discretize the continuous domain to make the problem solvable by computers. However, this introduces errors due to the approximations made, which can significantly affect the results.
02

Perform calculations with varying levels of discretization

Start by dividing the continuous domain into a small number of discrete points and perform the calculations. Then, repeat the process by gradually increasing the number of discrete points. With each increment, the results of the calculation will be more accurate.
03

Compare the results

Carefully compare the calculated results for each level of discretization. If the discretization error is significant, the calculated outputs should show noticeable differences between different levels of discretization.
04

Observe convergence or stabilization

As the number of discrete points increases, the calculated outputs should start to converge or stabilize, indicating that the discretization error has decreased and is no longer significant in the calculations. If the outputs stabilize with a reasonable number of discrete points, it means that the discretization error is under control.
05

Confirming the practical way of checking the discretization error

The practical way of checking if the discretization error has been significant in calculations is to compare the results obtained from calculations with varying levels of discretization and observe if the output stabilizes as the number of discrete points increases. If the output stabilizes within a reasonable range, it indicates the discretization error is not significant in the calculations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Numerical Methods
Numerical methods are essential algorithms that enable us to approximate solutions to mathematical problems that are often too complex to solve analytically. These methods, including differentiation, integration, and solving differential equations, are ubiquitous in fields like engineering, physics, and finance, where precise models are necessary.
The core of numerical methods lies in breaking down complex problems into manageable pieces that a computer can handle. They trade off small errors for the ability to find approximate answers to otherwise intractable problems. When implementing numerical methods, it's vital to consider the balance between computational cost and the accuracy of results. It is often impractical to seek an exact numerical result due to computer limitations like memory and processing power, hence the need for educated trade-offs.
In the context of the exercise, numerical methods would involve discretizing a continuous process to approximate the behavior of a system. The discretization process itself can introduce what is known as a discretization error, which we seek to minimize to make our approximations as precise as possible.
Continuous Domain Discretization
Continuous domain discretization refers to the process of dividing a continuous domain, such as time, space, or any other dimension, into a finite set of discrete points or intervals. This is a foundational step in numerical analysis since it enables computers, which operate in a discrete environment, to handle problems defined in continuous terms.
For example, when modeling the behavior of a fluid or simulating weather patterns, natural phenomena which vary continuously, discretization allows us to use finite elements, difference equations, or other techniques to approximate the behavior over these discrete points. While this makes complex calculations feasible, it also introduces discretization error—the difference between the real continuous value and its discrete approximation. This error must be analyzed and minimized to ensure the reliability of the simulation or model.
To effectively manage discretization errors, one can follow the steps highlighted in the original solution: starting with a coarse discretization, refining it by increasing the number of intervals or elements, and observing the behavior of calculation outputs.
Convergence in Calculations
Convergence in calculations is a concept that refers to the idea that as we refine our numerical method by using more discrete points or smaller intervals, the results we obtain should become increasingly close to the true value. When solutions to numerical problems exhibit this stepping closer to a specific value, we say that the calculations are converging.
Observing convergence is a practical indicator of discretization error reduction. As you increase the granularity of the discretization, continue the calculations until the difference between successive results falls below a predetermined threshold—this indicates that additional refinement yields minimal improvements, suggesting that the discretization error is not significantly affecting the results anymore.
It's also crucial to note that the rate of convergence can inform you about the efficiency of the numerical method used. Some numerical methods converge more rapidly than others, meaning they reach a stable solution with fewer discrete points, which is computationally advantageous. By following the practical steps outlined in the exercise, students can estimate and control the discretization error to ensure accurate and reliable results in their numerical calculations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A common annoyance in cars in winter months is the formation of fog on the glass surfaces that blocks the view. A practical way of solving this problem is to blow hot air or to attach electric resistance heaters to the inner surfaces. Consider the rear window of a car that consists of a \(0.4\)-cm-thick glass \(\left(k=0.84 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\right.\) and \(\left.\alpha=0.39 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{~m}^{2} / \mathrm{s}\right)\). Strip heater wires of negligible thickness are attached to the inner surface of the glass, \(4 \mathrm{~cm}\) apart. Each wire generates heat at a rate of \(25 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}\) length. Initially the entire car, including its windows, is at the outdoor temperature of \(T_{o}=-3^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The heat transfer coefficients at the inner and outer surfaces of the glass can be taken to be \(h_{i}=6\) and \(h_{o}=20 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), respectively. Using the explicit finite difference method with a mesh size of \(\Delta x=\) \(0.2 \mathrm{~cm}\) along the thickness and \(\Delta y=1 \mathrm{~cm}\) in the direction normal to the heater wires, determine the temperature distribution throughout the glass \(15 \mathrm{~min}\) after the strip heaters are turned on. Also, determine the temperature distribution when steady conditions are reached.

Consider steady one dimensional heat conduction in a plane wall with variable heat generation and constant thermal conductivity. The nodal network of the medium consists of nodes \(0,1,2,3,4\), and 5 with a uniform nodal spacing of \(\Delta x\). Using the energy balance approach, obtain the finite difference formulation of the boundary nodes for the case of insulation at the left boundary (node 0 ) and radiation at the right boundary (node 5) with an emissivity of \(\varepsilon\) and surrounding temperature of \(T_{\text {surr }}\)

The unsteady forward-difference heat conduction for a constant area, \(A\), pin fin with perimeter, \(p\), exposed to air whose temperature is \(T_{0}\) with a convection heat transfer coefficient of \(h\) is $$ \begin{aligned} T_{m}^{*+1}=& \frac{k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}\left[T_{m-1}^{*}+T_{m+1}^{*}+\frac{h p \Delta x^{2}}{A} T_{0}\right] \\\ &-\left[1-\frac{2 k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}-\frac{h p}{\rho c_{p} A}\right] T_{m}^{*} \end{aligned} $$ In order for this equation to produce a stable solution, the quantity \(\frac{2 k}{\rho c_{p} \Delta x^{2}}+\frac{h p}{\rho c_{p} A}\) must be (a) negative (b) zero (c) positive (d) greater than 1 (e) less than 1

A 1-m-long and 0.1-m-thick steel plate of thermal conductivity \(35 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) is well insulated on its both sides, while the top surface is exposed to a uniform heat flux of \(5500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). The bottom surface is convectively cooled by a fluid at \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) having a convective heat transfer coefficient of \(150 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). Assuming one dimensional heat conduction in the lateral direction, find the temperature at the midpoint of the plate. Discretize the plate thickness into four equal parts.

Consider a 2-m-long and 0.7-m-wide stainless-steel plate whose thickness is \(0.1 \mathrm{~m}\). The left surface of the plate is exposed to a uniform heat flux of \(2000 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) while the right surface of the plate is exposed to a convective environment at \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with \(h=400 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). The thermal conductivity of the stainless steel plate can be assumed to vary linearly with temperature range as \(k(T)=k_{o}(1+\beta T)\) where \(k_{o}=48 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) and \(\beta=9.21 \times 10^{-4}{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}^{-1}\). The stainless steel plate experiences a uniform volumetric heat generation at a rate of \(8 \times 10^{5} \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\). Assuming steady state one-dimensional heat transfer, determine the temperature distribution along the plate thickness.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.