/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q89P The smallest amount of energy ne... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The smallest amount of energy needed to eject an electron from metallic sodium is 2.28eV. Does sodium show a photoelectric effect for red light, with λ=680nm? (That is, does the light cause electron emission?) (b) What is the cutoff wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium? (c) To what color does that wavelength correspond?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The sodium does not show a photoelectric effect for a red light.

(b) The cut-off wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium is 545 nm.

(c) The color of the corresponding wavelength is green.

Step by step solution

01

Identification of the given data

The given data can be listed below as,

  • Thesmallest amount of energy needed to eject an electron from metallic sodium isA=2.28eV.
  • The wavelength of red light is, λ=680nm.
02

Significance of light wavelength

In this question, the value of the light wavelength of an electron can be obtained with the help of the value of the electron’s energy and Plank’s constant and light speed in a vacuum. The relation between the light energy and its wavelength is an indirect linear one.

03

(a) Determination of whether sodium shows a photoelectric effect for a red light or not

The expression to calculate the energy carried by the photon with wavelength 680nm is expressed as,

E=hcλ

Here, E is the energy carried by the photon with wavelength 680 nm , h is the Plank’s constant whose value is 6.63×10-34J·s, c is the light speed in vacuum whose value is 3×108m/s.

Substitute all the known values in the above equation.

E=6.63×10-34J·s3×108m/s680nm10-9m1nm≈2.93×10-19J≈2.93×10-19J11.6×10-19eV1J≈1.83eV

From the above calculations, the energy carried by the photon with wavelength 680 nm is less than the smallest amount of energy needed to eject an electron from metallic sodium 2.28eV(work function). Therefore, there is no photoelectric emission takes place.

Thus, the sodium does not show a photoelectric effect for the red light.

04

(b) Determination of the cut-off wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium

The expression to calculate the cut-off wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium is expressed as,

hcλo=Aλo=hcA

Here, λois the cut-off wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium.

Substitute all the known values in the above equation.

λo=6.63×10-34J·s3×108m/s2.28eV1.6×10-19J1eV≈5.45×10-7m≈5.45×10-7m×109nm1m≈545nm

Thus, the cut-off wavelength for photoelectric emission from sodium is 545 nm.

05

(c) Determination of the color of the corresponding wavelength

From the above calculations, one can observe that the cut-off wavelength of the photoelectric effect from sodium is less than the wavelength of the red light. The value of the cut-off wavelength of the photoelectric effect from sodium comes in the range of the wavelength of the green color.

Thus, the color of the corresponding wavelength is green.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The table gives relative values for three situations for the barrier tunneling experiment of Figs. 38-16 and 38-17. Rank the situations according to the probability of the electron tunneling through the barrier, greatest first.

Electron Energy

Barrier Height

Barrier Thickness

(a)

E

5E

L

(b)

E

17E

L/2

(c)

E

2E

2L

Question: Figure 38-13 shows a case in which the momentum component

pxof a particle is fixed so that ∆px=0 ; then, from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle (Eq. 38-28), the position x of the particle is completely unknown. From the same principle it follows that the opposite is also true; that is, if the position of a particle is exactly known (∆x=0), the uncertainty in its momentum is infinite.Consider an intermediate case, in which the position of aparticle is measured, not to infinite precision, but to within a distanceof λ2π, where λis the particle’s de Broglie wavelength.Show that the uncertainty in the (simultaneously measured) momentumcomponent is then equal to the component itself; that is,∆px=p. Under these circumstances, would a measured momentumof zero surprise you? What about a measured momentum of 0.5p? Of 0.2p? Of 12p?

For three experiments, Fig. 38-25 gives the transmission coefficient T for electron tunneling through a potential barrier, plotted versus barrier thickness L. The de Broglie wavelengths of the electrons are identical in the three experiments. The only difference in the physical setups is the barrier heights Ub. Rank the three experiments according to Ubgreatest first.


What is the photon energy for yellow light from a highway sodium lamp at a wavelength of 589 nm?

Question:For the arrangement of Figs. 38-14 and 38-15, electrons in the incident beam in region 1 have a speed of 1.60×107m/sand region 2 has an electric potential of V2-500V. What is the angular wave number in (a) region 1 and (b) region 2? (c) What is the reflection coefficient? (d) If the incident beam sends 3.00×109electrons against the potential step, approximately how many will be reflected?

Fig 38-14


Fig 38-15

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.