/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 An incident occurred on a cattle... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An incident occurred on a cattle ranch that resulted in an injury to the operator of a tub grinder. The tub grinder was being used to grind hay bales. The grinder was powered from a tractor by means of (i) hydraulic fluid pressure (that powered a hydraulic motor that turned the tub) and (ii) a power take off (PTO) shaft that powers a spinning hammer mill that rotates to "grind" the hay bale. The discharge spout of the tub grinder became clogged during operation. The operator exited the cab of the tractor, "turning off" the tractor PTO while leaving the tractor engine running. He walked to the tub grinder spout area, removed pins and opened the tub grinder shields (guards). The operator reached into the unguarded opening and at some point his right hand contacted the still rotating hammer mill of the tub grinder. At issue are (a) whether the tub grinder contained proper warnings, (b) whether the tub grinder hammer mill was properly guarded, and (c) whether the hammer mill should be allowed to "coast down" to a stop, or the hammer mill should stop rotating immediately once the tractor PTO is "turned off." Search the OSHA regulations http://www.osha.gov and specifically review the regulations 29 CFR \(1910.212\), General requirement for all machines, 29 CFR 1910.147, The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), and 29 CFR 1910.145, Specifications for accident prevention signs and tags. Write several paragraphs explaining how each regulation would apply to a tub grinder.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Safety measures and regulations were likely breached in the incident. It appears that the tub grinder hammer mill may not have been properly guarded as per regulation 29 CFR 1910.212. Additionally, per regulation 29 CFR 1910.147, it seems that hazardous energy was not adequately controlled as the grinder was still running during maintenance. Further, it is unknown whether the tub grinder was labeled with safety or warning signs as per regulation 29 CFR 1910.145.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Tub Grinder Components and Their Operations

An analysis of the tub grinder and how each component functions is essential. The tub grinder uses hydraulic fluid pressure and a PTO shaft for operation. It was during the unclogging process that the operator came into contact with the rotating hammer mill which resulted in injury.
02

Review of OSHA Regulations

In this step, review each specific OSHA regulation. Regulation 29 CFR 1910.212 covers general requirements for all machines and states that all machines should be equipped with guards in places where individuals might come into contact with moving parts. 29 CFR 1910.147 sets the standards for the control of hazardous energy, emphasizing procedures to ensure machinery has been sufficiently shut down before maintenance or service. 29 CFR 1910.145 is about specifications for accident prevention signs and tags which means that machinery should be equipped with warning signs and tagging systems.
03

Apply OSHA Regulations to the Tub Grinder

Using the information from the previous step, apply each regulation to the tub grinder. From regulation 29 CFR 1910.212, assess if the tub grinder was properly guarded. For 29 CFR 1910.147, insights will be drawn on whether the operator followed the correct procedure during maintenance and finally, 29 CFR 1910.145 will be examined in terms of any presence of safety and warning signs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

OSHA Standards
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) establishes rules for safe and healthful working conditions in various industries, including the agricultural sector. These rules, known as OSHA standards, are crucial for preventing workplace injuries. In the case of the tub grinder incident, three specific OSHA regulations are relevant:
  • 29 CFR 1910.212, which mandates that all machinery must have appropriate guarding to protect operators from coming into contact with moving parts.
  • 29 CFR 1910.147, which focuses on the control of hazardous energy, requiring procedures to be in place to lockout or tagout machines during maintenance to prevent accidental operation.
  • 29 CFR 1910.145, which specifies the need for proper accident prevention signs and tags to warn employees of the potential hazards associated with machinery.
By understanding and implementing these standards, workplaces can significantly reduce the risk of accidents like the one at the cattle ranch. Compliance involves both physical safeguards and procedural guidelines to ensure equipment is safely managed.
Hazardous Energy Control
Controlling hazardous energy is a vital aspect of maintaining safety around machinery. This is addressed by OSHA in regulation 29 CFR 1910.147, often referred to as the Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) standard. The LOTO regulation requires that machinery be properly shut off and disconnected from its energy source before any maintenance or service is performed.
The primary goal is to prevent accidental machine startup, which could lead to injuries, as seen in the tub grinder incident. Practices that may help include:
  • Establishing a clear lockout/tagout procedure and ensuring all employees are trained in its use.
  • Using tags and locks to communicate that equipment is under maintenance and should not be operated.
  • Regularly inspecting machinery to ensure compliance with LOTO regulations.
By effectively controlling hazardous energy, workplaces can protect workers from unexpected energy releases during machine servicing.
Machine Guarding
Machine guarding is another critical safety measure outlined in OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1910.212. Guards are physical barriers or devices designed to protect operators from the dangers of moving machine parts. In the context of the tub grinder, machine guarding involves having protective shields or barriers that prevent direct access to the hammer mill while it is in operation.
Proper machine guarding includes:
  • Ensuring all machinery is equipped with guards that are secure and tamper-resistant.
  • Regularly inspecting guards to ensure they are in good working order and have not been tampered with.
  • Educating operators about the importance of not bypassing or removing machine guards.
With effective machine guarding, the likelihood of injuries due to accidental contact with moving parts is greatly reduced.
Accident Prevention
Accident prevention is a broad concept that includes specific measures such as proper signage, operator training, and emergency procedures. OSHA’s regulation 29 CFR 1910.145 emphasizes the importance of accident prevention signs and tags to alert workers to potential dangers around machinery.
Helpful accident prevention practices involve:
  • Providing clear and visible warning signs on and around machinery to indicate potential hazards.
  • Conducting regular training sessions to ensure operators understand how to safely handle equipment and recognize warning signs.
  • Establishing and practicing emergency procedures in case of machinery malfunction or unexpected incidents.
By incorporating these strategies, employers can create a safer work environment and reduce the risk of accidents, protecting both the workforce and equipment.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Risk has been defined as the severity of the outcome of a hazard-related event times the probability that the event could occur. Several publications include the concepts of residual risk and acceptable or tolerable risk. Review the literature including technical report ANSI B11. TR3-2000 and write a report (that includes three references) on the concept of tolerable risk and risk reduction. In this report, provide definitions for hazard, probability, residual risk, risk, safety, severity, and tolerable risk.

Stairways-and mechanical engineers sometimes design stairways-have certain geometric requirements for their design, e.g., stairway steps shall be uniform with respect to rise and run. Review local and/or uniform building codes for stairways and steps and record the requirements for rise and run. Also address and answer the question, why are building codes such as those for stairways required?

Deceleration is sometimes measured in \(g\) 's or multiples of the standard acceleration of gravity. Determine the force, in newtons, that an automobile passenger whose mass is \(68 \mathrm{~kg}\) experiences if the deceleration in a head-on crash is \(50 \mathrm{~g}\).

An accident occurred at a gym where a young woman was injured while exiting a hack squat machine after completing a set of lifts. The woman was operating the incident hack (slide) squat machine when the carriage fell on her leg. She had entered the machine, completed one set of reps, and then placed the handle latches down on the machine. She released the carriage weight from her legs and felt the weight being supported. She then stepped her left foot from the footplate to the floor inside the machine and stood up. Then the machine's carriage assembly fell on the rear of her leg (left calf). Her left leg was pinned under the carriage. She was trapped and had to have the carriage raised off her leg before she could move.

Parking blocks prevent the forward movement of cars and other vehicle by acting like a "curb." Unfortunately, for elderly persons or others with poor vision, they are sometimes difficult to "see" as they project only four to eight inches off the ground. An ASTM standard recommends that parking blocks not be used in parking lots and parking garages. On the other hand, the Americans for Disabilities Act (ADA) shows the use of parking blocks in the design of parking spaces for persons with disabilities. What are the advantages and disadvantages of parking blocks? What is your opinion as to whether the utility outweighs the risk of harm of using parking blocks? Are there certain places where parking blocks should not be used? Are there parking garages that do not use parking blocks?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.