/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Consider the velocity boundary l... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the velocity boundary layer profile for flow over a flat plate to be of the form \(u=C_{1}+C_{2} y\). Applying appropriate boundary conditions, obtain an expression for the velocity profile in terms of the boundary layer thickness \(\delta\) and the free stream velocity \(u_{\infty}\). Using the integral form of the boundary layer momentum equation (Appendix G), obtain expressions for the boundary layer thickness and the local friction coefficient, expressing your result in terms of the local Reynolds number. Compare your results with those obtained from the exact solution (Section 7.2.1) and the integral solution with a cubic profile (Appendix \(G\) ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In this problem, we found an expression for the velocity profile inside the boundary layer of flow over a flat plate, given its form as \(u = C_1 + C_2y\), and after applying appropriate boundary conditions we obtained \(u = \frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}y\). Then, we used the integral form of the boundary layer momentum equation and derived expressions for boundary layer thickness and local friction coefficient in terms of the local Reynolds number as \(C_f = \frac{1}{2} (0.99)^2 \frac{\delta^2}{3}\). Finally, we compared our results with the exact Blasius solution (\(C_f = 0.664Re_\delta^{-1/2}\)) and the cubic profile solution, and concluded that although the linear profile provided a simpler way to model the flow, it wasn't as accurate as other more complex solutions.

Step by step solution

01

Identify boundary conditions

In this problem, there are two boundary conditions we need to use: 1. No-slip boundary condition at the flat plate surface (y = 0): \(u = 0\). 2. Far from the wall (y -> \(\infty\)): \(u\) approaches the free stream velocity \(u_{\infty}\).
02

Apply boundary conditions to the velocity profile

Applying the no-slip boundary condition at the flat plate surface (y = 0), we get: \(0 = C_1 + C_2(0)\) Thus, \(C_1 = 0\), and our velocity profile becomes: \(u = C_2y\) Far from the wall boundary condition (y -> \(\infty\)): \(\lim_{y \to \infty}u = u_{\infty}\) Since as y -> \(\infty\), the velocity profile should approach the free stream velocity, we can set a characteristic distance, such as boundary layer thickness \(\delta\) as the location where \(u = 0.99 u_{\infty}\). Now, we can use \(\delta\) to evaluate \(C_2\): \(0.99u_{\infty} = C_2\delta\) Thus, \(C_2 = \frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}\), and our velocity profile becomes: \(u = \frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}y\)
03

Use the integral form of the boundary layer momentum equation

The integral form of the boundary layer momentum equation is given by: \( \int_{0}^{\delta} u\frac{du}{dy} dy = u_{\infty}\tau_w\) Where \(\tau_w\) is the local wall shear stress. We need to find the local friction coefficient, so: \(\tau_w = \frac{1}{2}\rho u_{\infty}^2 C_f\) Now let's find \(\frac{du}{dy}\) for our velocity profile: \(\frac{du}{dy} = \frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}\) Next, we plug it into the momentum equation: \(\int_{0}^{\delta} (\frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}y)(\frac{0.99u_{\infty}}{\delta}) dy = u_{\infty}\frac{1}{2}\rho u_{\infty}^2 C_f\)
04

Solve for the local friction coefficient and boundary layer thickness

Now we integrate the equation: \(\frac{(0.99u_{\infty})^2}{\delta^2} \int_{0}^{\delta} y dy= \frac{1}{2}\rho u_{\infty}^3C_f\) \(C_f = \frac{2(0.99)^2}{\rho u_{\infty}^2}\int_0^\delta y dy\) Integrating, we get: \(C_f = \frac{(0.99)^2}{2} \frac{\delta^2}{3}\) Now we need to solve for \(\delta\) in terms of local Reynolds number: \(Re_\delta = \frac{\rho u_{\infty}\delta}{\mu}\) Since we are asked to express the results in terms of the local Reynolds number, we'll make use of this formula: \(\delta = \frac{Re_\delta \mu}{\rho u_{\infty}}\) Thus, for our given problem, we have: \(C_f = \frac{1}{2} (0.99)^2 \frac{\delta^2}{3}\)
05

Comparison with the exact and cubic profile solutions

The Blasius solution (exact solution) for the local friction coefficient, as described in the textbook, is given by: \(C_f = 0.664Re_\delta^{-1/2}\) The cubic profile solution, as given in the Appendix G of the textbook, is: \(C_f = \frac{C_1}{Re_\delta^{1/n}}\) Where \(C_1\) and \(n\) are constants that depend on profiles. Our solution, given as: \(C_f = \frac{1}{2} (0.99)^2 \frac{\delta^2}{3}\) It can be observed that the results from our linear profile are not as accurate when compared to the exact solution and cubic profile solution due to the simple nature of the linear profile. More complex profiles provide a better approximation for real life flow situations. In conclusion, we found an expression for the velocity profile and derived expressions for boundary layer thickness and local friction coefficient using the integral momentum equation. Although the linear profile provided a simpler way to model the flow, it isn't as accurate as other more complex solutions such as the Blasius or cubic profile solutions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Velocity Boundary Layer
Imagine a fluid flowing over a flat surface. Right at the surface, the fluid has no velocity due to the surface's friction—a phenomenon known as the 'no-slip condition.' As you move away from the surface, the velocity of the fluid increases until it matches the free-flowing stream. This transition zone is the velocity boundary layer. It’s a crucial concept in fluid mechanics because it characterizes how the fluid’s velocity changes from zero at the surface to the free stream velocity at a certain distance from the surface, often noted as \( \delta \). The thickness of this boundary layer, \( \delta \), is particularly significant in calculating forces such as drag on the surface and is influenced by factors like fluid viscosity and flow speed.

Understanding the concept of the velocity boundary layer is essential for predicting how fluids will behave when in contact with solid boundaries, which is critical for engineering applications such as aircraft design and predicting weather patterns.
No-slip Boundary Condition
The no-slip boundary condition is a fundamental premise in fluid dynamics. It states that the velocity of a fluid (liquid or gas) at a solid boundary is equal to the velocity of the boundary itself. If the boundary is stationary, the fluid velocity at that point is zero. This concept is vital when analyzing fluid flow patterns as it sets the initial condition for the velocity profile near the boundary. Applying this condition in calculations like the flow over a flat plate means that engineers can predict how the fluid will interact with the surface, which has practical implications in reducing friction and designing more efficient systems.
Local Reynolds Number
The local Reynolds number, often denoted as \( Re_{\delta} \), is a dimensionless quantity in fluid mechanics used to predict the flow patterns in different fluid flow situations. It is defined in terms of the boundary layer thickness \( \delta \) as \( Re_{\delta} = \frac{\rho u_{\infty}\delta}{\mu} \) where \( \rho \) is the density of the fluid, \( u_{\infty} \) is the free stream velocity, \( \delta \) is the boundary layer thickness, and \( \mu \) is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid.

The local Reynolds number helps determine whether the flow will be laminar or turbulent. Lower values indicate laminar flow, where the fluid moves in ordered layers, while higher values suggest turbulent flow with chaotic fluid motion. This is crucial for understanding the fluid's behavior and its interaction with surfaces, affecting design decisions in many engineering systems.
Local Friction Coefficient
The local friction coefficient, \( C_f \), relates to the shear stress exerted by the fluid flowing over a surface. It is a dimensionless number that reflects the amount of resistance a fluid flow encounters due to its contact with a solid surface. In more technical terms, this coefficient is a measure of the wall shear stress normalized by the dynamic pressure of the flow. In our exercise, we used the integral momentum equation to find a relationship between the local friction coefficient and the boundary layer thickness. \( C_f \) tells us how 'sticky' the fluid is as it flows over the surface, and knowing its value helps in designing surfaces to minimize drag, such as in aircraft wings, or to maximize it when you need more heat transfer, like in a radiator.
Integral Momentum Equation
The integral momentum equation is a foundational concept in boundary layer analysis. It expresses the conservation of momentum for a control volume within the boundary layer. The equation balances the momentum entering and leaving the control volume and the forces acting on the fluid within it, such as viscous stresses at the wall. Mathematically, it integrates the product of the velocity and its gradient across the boundary layer thickness. It’s an equation that captures the essence of momentum changes in fluid flow over a surface and provides the means to calculate key properties such as the boundary layer thickness, shear stress, and ultimately, the friction coefficient. This equation is particularly useful since it allows for estimations of the flow behavior without the need for complex and resource-intensive computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Blasius Solution
The Blasius solution is a classic exact solution for the boundary layer equations, describing steady two-dimensional laminar flow over a flat plate. It is a similarity solution, meaning it reduces the partial differential equations governing the boundary layer to an ordinary differential equation using a similarity variable. This result is significant because it provides a closed-form analytical expression for the velocity profile within the boundary layer and other quantities of interest, such as the local friction coefficient. In our exercise, the comparison of our linearly approximated results to the Blasius solution helps illustrate the limitations of simpler models and the need for more sophisticated approaches to accurately predict real-life fluid behavior. The Blasius solution serves as a benchmark to validate approximate methods and to understand the nature of laminar flow over flat plates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An array of 10 silicon chips, each of length \(L=10 \mathrm{~mm}\) on a side, is insulated on one surface and cooled on the opposite surface by atmospheric air in parallel flow with \(T_{\infty}=24^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and \(u_{\infty}=40 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). When in use, the same electrical power is dissipated in each chip, maintaining a uniform heat flux over the entire cooled surface. If the temperature of each chip may not exceed \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), what is the maximum allowable power per chip? What is the maximum allowable power if a turbulence promoter is used to trip the boundary layer at the leading edge? Would it be preferable to orient the array normal, instead of parallel, to the airflow?

An uninsulated steam pipe is used to transport hightemperature steam from one building to another. The pipe is of \(0.5-\mathrm{m}\) diameter, has a surface temperature of \(150^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and is exposed to ambient air at \(-10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The air moves in cross flow over the pipe with a velocity of \(5 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\). (a) What is the heat loss per unit length of pipe? (b) Consider the effect of insulating the pipe with a rigid urethane foam \((k=0.026 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K})\). Evaluate and plot the heat loss as a function of the thickness \(\delta\) of the insulation layer for \(0 \leq \delta \leq 50 \mathrm{~mm}\).

In the production of sheet metals or plastics, it is customary to cool the material before it leaves the production process for storage or shipment to the customer. Typically, the process is continuous, with a sheet of thickness \(\delta\) and width \(W\) cooled as it transits the distance \(L\) between two rollers at a velocity \(V\). In this problem, we consider cooling of an aluminum alloy (2024-T6) by an airstream moving at a velocity \(u_{\infty}\) in counter flow over the top surface of the sheet. A turbulence promoter is used to provide turbulent boundary layer development over the entire surface. (a) By applying conservation of energy to a differential control surface of length \(d x\), which either moves with the sheet or is stationary and through which the sheet passes, derive a differential equation that governs the temperature distribution along the sheet. Because of the low emissivity of the aluminum, radiation effects may be neglected. Express your result in terms of the velocity, thickness, and properties of the sheet \(\left(V, \delta, \rho, c_{p}\right)\), the local convection coefficient \(h_{x}\) associated with the counter flow, and the air temperature. For a known temperature of the sheet \(\left(T_{i}\right)\) at the onset of cooling and a negligible effect of the sheet velocity on boundary layer development, solve the equation to obtain an expression for the outlet temperature \(T_{a}\). (b) For \(\delta=2 \mathrm{~mm}, V=0.10 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}, L=5 \mathrm{~m}, W=1 \mathrm{~m}\), \(u_{\infty}=20 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}, T_{\infty}=20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and \(T_{i}=300^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), what is the outlet temperature \(T_{a}\) ?

A circular pipe of 25 -mm outside diameter is placed in an airstream at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and 1 -atm pressure. The air moves in cross flow over the pipe at \(15 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\), while the outer surface of the pipe is maintained at \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). What is the drag force exerted on the pipe per unit length? What is the rate of heat transfer from the pipe per unit length?

An air duct heater consists of an aligned array of electrical heating elements in which the longitudinal and transverse pitches are \(S_{L}=S_{T}=24 \mathrm{~mm}\). There are 3 rows of elements in the flow direction \(\left(N_{L}=3\right)\) and 4 elements per row \(\left(N_{T}=4\right)\). Atmospheric air with an upstream velocity of \(12 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) and a temperature of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) moves in cross flow over the elements, which have a diameter of \(12 \mathrm{~mm}\), a length of \(250 \mathrm{~mm}\), and are maintained at a surface temperature of \(350^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). (a) Determine the total heat transfer to the air and the temperature of the air leaving the duct heater. (b) Determine the pressure drop across the element bank and the fan power requirement. (c) Compare the average convection coefficient obtained in your analysis with the value for an isolated (single) element. Explain the difference between the results. (d) What effect would increasing the longitudinal and transverse pitches to \(30 \mathrm{~mm}\) have on the exit temperature of the air, the total heat rate, and the pressure drop?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.