/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 108 The stability criterion for the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The stability criterion for the explicit method requires that the coefficient of the \(T_{m}^{p}\) term of the one-dimensional, finite-difference equation be zero or positive. Consider the situation for which the temperatures at the two neighboring nodes \(\left(T_{\mathrm{m}-1}^{p}, T_{\mathrm{m}+1}^{p}\right)\) are \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) while the center node \(\left(T_{m}^{p}\right)\) is at \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Show that for values of \(F o>\frac{1}{2}\) the finite-difference equation will predict a value of \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) that violates the second law of thermodynamics.

Short Answer

Expert verified
When the Fourier number (Fo) is greater than \(\frac{1}{2}\), the explicit finite-difference equation for heat conduction predicts a temperature \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) that violates the second law of thermodynamics, as it will exceed the temperatures of the neighboring nodes. This results in an incorrect prediction of heat flow, as the temperature must fall between the initial temperature and the neighboring nodes' temperatures.

Step by step solution

01

Write the finite-difference equation for heat conduction

The one-dimensional, explicit finite-difference equation for heat conduction is given by: \[ T_{m}^{p+1} = T_{m}^{p} + Fo \left( T_{m+1}^{p} - 2T_{m}^{p} + T_{m-1}^{p} \right) \] Where \(Fo\) is the Fourier number, \(T_{m}^{p}\) is the temperature at the center node at time level p, \(T_{m+1}^{p}\) and \(T_{m-1}^{p}\) are the temperatures at the neighboring nodes at time level p, and \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) is the predicted temperature at the center node for the next time step.
02

Substitute the given temperatures and analyze Fo

Now, we have to substitute the given temperature values into the equation: - \(T_{m}^{p} = 50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) - \(T_{m+1}^{p} = T_{m-1}^{p} = 100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) We are also given the condition that \(Fo > \frac{1}{2}\). We now substitute these values into the finite-difference equation: \[ T_{m}^{p+1} = 50 + Fo \left( 100 - 2\cdot50 + 100 \right) \]
03

Simplify the equation and analyze the result

Simplify the equation: \[ T_{m}^{p+1} = 50 + Fo \cdot 100 \] Remember that the second law of thermodynamics states that the predicted temperature should be between the initial temperature (50) and the neighboring nodes' temperatures (100): \[50 \leq T_{m}^{p+1} \leq 100\] However, for any \(Fo > \frac{1}{2}\), the predicted temperature \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) will exceed 100: \[ T_{m}^{p+1} = 50 + 100 \cdot \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) = 100\] For \(Fo\) values greater than 1/2, \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) will be greater than 100 and the inequality above will not hold true. Thus, we have shown that if the Fourier number is greater than 1/2, the finite-difference equation used in the explicit method will predict a temperature that violates the second law of thermodynamics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Fourier number (Fo)
The Fourier number (Fo) is a dimensionless quantity used in heat conduction analysis to characterize the transient thermal response of a material. It represents the ratio of heat conduction rate to the heat storage rate within a material and is expressed mathematically as:\[ Fo = \frac{\alpha \cdot t}{L^{2}} \]where \(\alpha\) is thermal diffusivity, \(t\) is the time, and \(L\) is the characteristic length. In the context of the explicit finite-difference method, it is a crucial factor that affects the stability and accuracy of the solution. And as we have seen in the original exercise, a value of Fo greater than 1/2 can lead to physically unrealistic results that conflict with the second law of thermodynamics. This demonstrates the importance of selecting appropriate values for \(Fo\) to ensure that the model predictions are both stable and accurate.
Second law of thermodynamics
The second law of thermodynamics is a fundamental principle that dictates the direction of heat transfer, stating that heat flows spontaneously from regions of higher temperature to regions of lower temperature, and not the other way round. It also implies that in a closed system, the total entropy, a measure of disorder or randomness in the system, can never decrease over time.

Within the context of heat conduction and the Fourier number, it is crucial for predicting temperatures to stay true to this law. When the system is in a stable condition, the second law dictates that the node's temperature, such as \(T_{m}^{p+1}\) from our exercise, should not surpass the neighboring nodes' temperatures after heat has been conducted. If the predicted temperature exceeds this limit, it is a clear indication that the model violates the second law, which is not physically possible. This understanding serves as a critical check on any results obtained from thermal analysis and simulation.
Heat conduction
Heat conduction is the process by which thermal energy is transferred from hotter to cooler areas due to the particles' kinetic energy within a material. Conduction occurs in solids, liquids, or gases that are at rest. The heat transfer continues until thermal equilibrium is reached and there is no net movement of thermal energy. In the physics of heat conduction, Fourier's law is one of the fundamental laws which states that the heat transfer rate is proportional to the negative gradient in the temperature and to the area through which the heat is flowing. In mathematical terms:\[ q = -k \cdot A \cdot \frac{dT}{dx} \]where \(q\) is the heat transfer rate, \(k\) is the material's thermal conductivity, \(A\) is the cross-sectional area through which heat is being conducted, and \(dT/dx\) is the temperature gradient. For accurately modeling heat conduction, the explicit finite-difference method may be used, where the temperature at any node is computed based on its own previous temperature and the temperatures of neighboring nodes.
Stability criterion
In numerical analysis, the stability criterion refers to the conditions under which a numerical solution method provides results that are not only correct but also stable over time, without yielding increasing numerical errors or physically unrealistic outcomes. For heat conduction problems solved by the explicit finite-difference method, stability is tied to the Fourier number. A critical limitation, as explored in our exercise, is that for the stability and physical realism of the result, Fo must be constrained to a certain range - in our case, it should not exceed 1/2.

This stability criterion is part of von Neumann stability analysis, which ensures that errors in the numerical solution do not grow uncontrollably over successive time steps. When adhered to, it allows for a stable progression of the temperature field through a material over time, without violating physical laws such as the second law of thermodynamics. Neglecting the stability criterion can lead to nonsensical results, which is why understanding and applying this principle is essential in explicit finite-difference thermal analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A microwave oven operates on the principle that application of a high- frequency field causes electrically polarized molecules in food to oscillate. The net effect is a nearly uniform generation of thermal energy within the food. Consider the process of cooking a slab of beef of thickness \(2 L\) in a microwave oven and compare it with cooking in a conventional oven, where each side of the slab is heated by radiation. In each case the meat is to be heated from \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to a minimum temperature of \(90^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Base your comparison on a sketch of the temperature distribution at selected times for each of the cooking processes. In particular, consider the time \(t_{0}\) at which heating is initiated, a time \(t_{1}\) during the heating process, the time \(t_{2}\) corresponding to the conclusion of heating, and a time \(t_{3}\) well into the subsequent cooling process.

As part of a heat treatment process, cylindrical, 304 stainless steel rods of \(100-\mathrm{mm}\) diameter are cooled from an initial temperature of \(500^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) by suspending them in an oil bath at \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). If a convection coefficient of \(500 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\) is maintained by circulation of the oil, how long does it take for the centerline of a rod to reach a temperature of \(50^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), at which point it is withdrawn from the bath? If 10 rods of length \(L=1 \mathrm{~m}\) are processed per hour, what is the nominal rate at which energy must be extracted from the bath (the cooling load)?

An electronic device, such as a power transistor mounted on a finned heat sink, can be modeled as a spatially isothermal object with internal heat generation and an external convection resistance. (a) Consider such a system of mass \(M\), specific heat \(c\), and surface area \(A_{s}\), which is initially in equilibrium with the environment at \(T_{\infty}\). Suddenly, the electronic device is energized such that a constant heat generation \(\dot{E}_{g}(\mathrm{~W})\) occurs. Show that the temperature response of the device is $$ \frac{\theta}{\theta_{i}}=\exp \left(-\frac{t}{R C}\right) $$ where \(\theta \equiv T-T(\infty)\) and \(T(\infty)\) is the steady-state temperature corresponding to \(t \rightarrow \infty ; \theta_{i}=T_{i}-T(\infty)\); \(T_{i}=\) initial temperature of device; \(R=\) thermal resistance \(1 / \bar{h} A_{s} ;\) and \(C=\) thermal capacitance \(M c\). (b) An electronic device, which generates \(60 \mathrm{~W}\) of heat, is mounted on an aluminum heat sink weighing \(0.31 \mathrm{~kg}\) and reaches a temperature of \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) in ambient air at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) under steady-state conditions. If the device is initially at \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), what temperature will it reach \(5 \mathrm{~min}\) after the power is switched on?

A long cylinder of \(30-\mathrm{mm}\) diameter, initially at a uniform temperature of \(1000 \mathrm{~K}\), is suddenly quenched in a large, constant- temperature oil bath at \(350 \mathrm{~K}\). The cylinder properties are \(k=1.7 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{K}, c=1600 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), and \(\rho=400 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\), while the convection coefficient is \(50 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\). (a) Calculate the time required for the surface of the cylinder to reach \(500 \mathrm{~K}\). (b) Compute and plot the surface temperature history for \(0 \leq t \leq 300 \mathrm{~s}\). If the oil were agitated, providing a convection coefficient of \(250 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2} \cdot \mathrm{K}\), how would the temperature history change?

When a molten metal is cast in a mold that is a poor conductor, the dominant resistance to heat flow is within the mold wall. Consider conditions for which a liquid metal is solidifying in a thick-walled mold of thermal conductivity \(k_{v}\) and thermal diffusivity \(\alpha_{w}\). The density and latent heat of fusion of the metal are designated as \(\rho\) and \(h_{s f}\), respectively, and in both its molten and solid states, the thermal conductivity of the metal is very much larger than that of the mold. Just before the start of solidification \((S=0)\), the mold wall is everywhere at an initial uniform temperature \(T_{i}\) and the molten metal is everywhere at its fusion (melting point) temperature of \(T_{f}\). Following the start of solidification, there is conduction heat transfer into the mold wall and the thickness of the solidified metal \(S\) increases with time \(t\). (a) Sketch the one-dimensional temperature distribution, \(T(x)\), in the mold wall and the metal at \(t=0\) and at two subsequent times during the solidification. Clearly indicate any underlying assumptions. (b) Obtain a relation for the variation of the solid layer thickness \(S\) with time \(t\), expressing your result in terms of appropriate parameters of the system.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.