/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q32 PE A person in good physical condit... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A person in good physical condition can put out 100 W of useful power for several hours at a stretch, perhaps by pedaling a mechanism that drives an electric generator. Neglecting any problems of generator efficiency and practical considerations such as resting time:

(a) How many people would it take to run a 4.00-kW electric clothes dryer?

(b) How many people would it take to replace a large electric power plant that generates 800 MW?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Number of people needed to run a 4.00kWelectric clothes dryer if each person can put out a 100Wof useful power are 40.

(b) The number of people required to replace a large electric power plant that generates 800MWis 8 million.

Step by step solution

01

Power

Power: Power is defined as the rate at which energy is expended. Greater power means a large amount of work or energy developed in a short time.

02

Number of people needed to run an electric clothes dryer

(a)

The rate of work done per person is,

PP=100W

Power consumption of electric clothes dryer is,

PD=4.00kW

Number of people required to run an electric clothes dryer is,

n=PDPP

Putting all known values,

n=4.00kW100W=4.00kW1000W1kW100W=40

Therefore, 40 peoples are required to run an electric clothes dryer.

03

Number of people needed to replace large electric generator

(b)

The power generated by a large electric power plant generator is,

PG=800MW

Number of people required to replace the large electric power plant generator is,

N=PWPP

Putting all known values,

role="math" localid="1668691687774" N=800MW100W=800×106W100W=8×106W

Therefore,8×106W people are required to replace a large electric power plant generator.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Boxing gloves are padded to lessen the force of a blow.

(a) Calculate the force exerted by a boxing glove on an opponent’s face, if the glove and face compress 7.50 cm during a blow in which the 7.00-kg arm and glove are brought to rest from an initial speed of 10.0 m/s.

(b) Calculate the force exerted by an identical blow in the gory old days when no gloves were used and the knuckles and face would compress only 2.00 cm.

(c) Discuss the magnitude of the force with glove on. Does it seem high enough to cause damage even though it is lower than the force with no glove?

What is the difference between energy conservation and the law of conservation of energy? Give some examples of each.

Suppose the ski patrol lowers a rescue sled and victim, having a total mass of 90.0 kg, down a 60.0º slope at constant speed, as shown in Figure 7.37. The coefficient of friction between the sled and the snow is 0.100.

(a) How much work is done by friction as the sled moves 30.0 m along the hill?

(b) How much work is done by the rope on the sled in this distance?

(c) What is the work done by the gravitational force on the sled?

(d) What is the total work done?

Figure 7.37 A rescue sled and victim are lowered down a steep slope.

(a) How fast must a 3000-kg elephant move to have the same kinetic energy as a 65.0-kg sprinter running at 10.0 m/s?

(b) Discuss how the larger energies needed for the movement of larger animals would relate to metabolic rates.

In Example 7.7, we calculated the final speed of a roller coaster that descended \(20{\rm{ m}}\) in height and had an initial speed of \(5{\rm{ m}}/{\rm{s}}\) downhill. Suppose the roller coaster had had an initial speed of \(5{\rm{ m}}/{\rm{s}}\) uphill instead, and it coasted uphill, stopped, and then rolled back down to a final point 20m below the start. We would find in that case that it had the same final speed. Explain in terms of conservation of energy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.