/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q31PE A section of superconducting wir... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A section of superconducting wire carries a current of\({\rm{100 A}}\)and requires\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.00 L}}\)of liquid nitrogen per hour to keep it below its critical temperature. For it to be economically advantageous to use a superconducting wire, the cost of cooling the wire must be less than the cost of energy lost to heat in the wire. Assume that the cost of liquid nitrogen is\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.30}}\)per litre, and that electric energy costs\({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.10}}\)per KW·h. What is the resistance of a normal wire that costs as much in wasted electric energy as the cost of liquid nitrogen for the superconductor?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The resistance of a normal wire is \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.3 \Omega }}\).

Step by step solution

01

Power and Energy

The expression for the power is given by,

\(P = {I^2}R\)

Here\(P\)is the power,\(I\)is the current flowing through the wire and\(R\)is the resistance.

The expression for the energy is given by,

\(\begin{align}E = P \times t\\ = {I^2}Rt\end{align}\)

02

Evaluating the resistance of a normal wire

According to the information provided.

The cooling a superconductor wire costs \({\rm{1 L}}\) of \({{\rm{N}}_{\rm{2}}}\) per hour,

Or else, \({\rm{\$ 0}}{\rm{.30}}\) per hour,

We'd spend an hour together.

\({\rm{price = 0}}{\rm{.30 \$ }}\)

We would extract energy \(E\) from a power source to spend the same amount for electric energy in a typical wire at the price of \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.10 \$ / kWh}}\).

\(\begin{align}E{\rm{ }} &= {\rm{ }}\frac{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.30 \$ }}}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.10 \$ / kWh}}}}\\ &= {\rm{ 3 kWh}}\end{align}\)

Then, the power in a normal wire is:

\(P = {I^2}R\)

With the released energy as:

\(\begin{align}E = Pt\\ = {I^2}Rt\end{align}\)

So, the value of\({\rm{R}}\)is obtained as:

\(\begin{align}R &= \frac{E}{{{I^2}Rt}}\\ &= \frac{{{\rm{3kWh}}}}{{{{{\rm{(100A)}}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{1h}}}}\\ &= \frac{{{\rm{3 \times 1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{3}}}{\rm{W}}}}{{{\rm{1}}{{\rm{0}}^{\rm{4}}}{{\rm{A}}^{\rm{2}}}}}\\ &= {\rm{0}}{\rm{.3}}\,{\rm{\Omega }}\end{align}\)

Therefore, the resistance is \({\rm{0}}{\rm{.3 \Omega }}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Distances to local galaxies are determined by measuring the brightness of stars, called Cepheid variables, that can be observed individually and that have absolute brightness at a standard distance that are well known. Explain how the measured brightness would vary with distance as compared with the absolute brightness.

Suppose you measure the red shifts of all the images produced by gravitational lensing, such as in figure below. You find that the central image has a red shift less than the outer images, and those all have the same red shift. Discuss how this not only shows that the images are of the same object, but also implies that the red shift is not affected by taking different paths through space. Does it imply that cosmological red shifts are not caused by traveling through space (light getting tired, perhaps)?

Using data from the previous problem, find the increase in rotational kinetic energy, given the core’s mass is\({\rm{1}}{\rm{.3}}\)times that of our Sun. Where does this increase in kinetic energy come from?

Consider a star moving in a circular orbit at the edge of a galaxy. Construct a problem in which you calculate the mass of that galaxy in kg and in multiples of the solar mass based on the velocity of the star and its distance from the center of the galaxy.

Show that the velocity of a star orbiting its galaxy in a circular orbit is inversely proportional to the square root of its orbital radius, assuming the mass of the stars inside its orbit acts like a single mass at the center of the galaxy. You may use an equation from a previous chapter to support your conclusion, but you must justify its use and define all terms used.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.