/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q56PE What can you say about two charg... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What can you say about two charges \({q_1}\) and \({q_2}\), if the electric field one-fourth of the way from \({q_1}\) to \({q_2}\) is zero?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The charge \({q_2}\) is \(9\) times larger than \({q_1}\).

Step by step solution

01

Electric field

Electric field is defined as the force experienced by a unit positive charge when place in the region of another charge. The expression for the electric field is,

\(E = \frac{{Kq}}{{{r^2}}}\)

Here,\(K\)is the electrostatic force constant,\(q\)is the charge and\(r\)is the distance of point of consideration from the charge.

For a system of multiple charge, the electric field at a particular point is the vector sum of all the electric field at that point.

02

Electric field one-fourth of the way

The electric field one-fourth of the way from \({q_1}\) to \({q_2}\) is represented as,

Electric field one-fourth of the way from\({q_1}\)to\({q_2}\)

Here,\({E_1}\)is the electric field due to charge\({q_1}\), and\({E_2}\)is the electric field due to charge\({q_2}\).

The electric field due to charge\({q_1}\)is,

\({E_1} = \frac{{K{q_1}}}{{{x^2}}}\)

The electric field due to charge\({q_2}\)is,

\({E_2} = \frac{{K{q_2}}}{{{{\left( {3x} \right)}^2}}}\)

The net electric field one-fourth of the way from\({q_1}\)to\({q_2}\)is,

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {E_1} - {E_2}\\ = \frac{{K{q_1}}}{{{x^2}}} - \frac{{K{q_2}}}{{{{\left( {3x} \right)}^2}}}\end{array}\)

Since the electric field one-fourth of the way from\({q_1}\)to\({q_2}\)is zero i.e.,\(E = 0\). Therefore,

\(\begin{array}{c}0 = \frac{{K{q_1}}}{{{x^2}}} - \frac{{K{q_2}}}{{{{\left( {3x} \right)}^2}}}\\\frac{{K{q_1}}}{{{x^2}}} = \frac{{K{q_2}}}{{{{\left( {3x} \right)}^2}}}\\{q_2} = \frac{{{{\left( {3x} \right)}^2}}}{{{x^2}}}{q_1}\\{q_2} = 9{q_1}\end{array}\)

Hence, the charge\({q_2}\)is\(9\)times larger than\({q_1}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Using the symmetry of the arrangement, show that the electric field at the center of the square in Figure 18.46 is zero if the charges on the four corners are exactly equal. (b) Show that this is also true for any combination of charges in which \({q_a} = {q_b}\) and \({q_b} = {q_c}\).

Why does a car always attract dust right after it is polished? (Note that car wax and car tires are insulators.)

Suppose a speck of dust in an electrostatic precipitator has 1.0000×1012 protons in it and has a net charge of -5.00 nC (a very large charge for a small speck). How many electrons does it have?

Figure 18.57 shows an electron passing between two charged metal plates that create an\(100{\rm{ N}}/{\rm{C}}\)vertical electric field perpendicular to the electron’s original horizontal velocity. (These can be used to change the electron’s direction, such as in an oscilloscope.) The initial speed of the electron is\(3.00 \times {10^6}{\rm{ m}}/{\rm{s}}\), and the horizontal distance it travels in the uniform field is\(4.00{\rm{ cm}}\). (a) What is its vertical deflection? (b) What is the vertical component of its final velocity? (c) At what angle does it exit? Neglect any edge effects.

The discussion of the electric field between two parallel conducting plates, in this module states that edge effects are less important if the plates are close together. What does close mean? That is, is the actual plate separation crucial, or is the ratio of plate separation to plate area crucial?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.