/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.5.17 The enthalpy and Gibbs free ener... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The enthalpy and Gibbs free energy, as defined in this section, give special treatment to mechanical (compression-expansion) work, -PdV. Analogous quantities can be defined for other kinds of work, for instance, magnetic work." Consider the situation shown in Figure 5.7, where a long solenoid ( Nturns, total length N) surrounds a magnetic specimen (perhaps a paramagnetic solid). If the magnetic field inside the specimen is B→and its total magnetic moment is M→, then we define an auxilliary field H→(often called simply the magnetic field) by the relation

H→≡1μ0B→-M→V,

where μ0is the "permeability of free space," 4π×10-7N/A2. Assuming cylindrical symmetry, all vectors must point either left or right, so we can drop the -→symbols and agree that rightward is positive, leftward negative. From Ampere's law, one can also show that when the current in the wire is I, the Hfield inside the solenoid is NI/L, whether or not the specimen is present.

(a) Imagine making an infinitesimal change in the current in the wire, resulting in infinitesimal changes in B, M, and H. Use Faraday's law to show that the work required (from the power supply) to accomplish this change is Wtotal=VHdB. (Neglect the resistance of the wire.)

(b) Rewrite the result of part (a) in terms of Hand M, then subtract off the work that would be required even if the specimen were not present. If we define W, the work done on the system, †to be what's left, show that W=μ0HdM.

(c) What is the thermodynamic identity for this system? (Include magnetic work but not mechanical work or particle flow.)

(d) How would you define analogues of the enthalpy and Gibbs free energy for a magnetic system? (The Helmholtz free energy is defined in the same way as for a mechanical system.) Derive the thermodynamic identities for each of these quantities, and discuss their interpretations.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) we showed that Wtot.=HVdB

b) we showed that Hm=U-μ0HM

c)The thermodynamic identity for this system isdU=TdS+μ0HdM

d)The enthalpy and Gibbs free energy for a magnetic system isdG=-SdT-μ0MdH

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) - Step 1: To find

we have to show thatWtot.=HVdB

02

Part (a) - Step 2: Explanation

Any change in the magnetic environment of a coil of wire will cause a voltage (emf) to be "generated" in the coil, according to Faraday's law. And the magnitude of the induced emf can be calculated as follows:

E=NdΦBdt

where ΦB=ABis the magnetic flux, so:

E=NAdBdt......(1)

The induced emf multiplied by the current flowing through the coil equals the coil's power, so:

P=EIP=NAIdBdt.....(2)

Whether or not the specimen is present, the magnetic field H inside the coil is N I / L. Substitute the following into (2):

P=HLAdBdt

The length of the cylinder multiplied by the cross sectional area of the cylinder equals the volume of the cylinder, so:

P=HVdBdt

The integration of power with respect to time equals the work or energy, so:

Wtot.=∫Pdt=HV∫dBdtdtWtot.=HVdB

Hence proved.

03

Part (b) - Step 3: To show 

Hm=U-μ0HM

04

Part (b) - Step 4: Explanation

The magnetic field of B can be written in terms of H and M as:

B=μ0H+MV

We get: for an infinitesimal change in B

dB=μ0dH+dMV

substitute into the result of part (a) to get:

Wtot.=μ0HVdH+dMVWtot.=μ0HVdH+μ0HdM

we can writeHdHasd12H2, so:

Wtot.=d12μ0VH2+μ0HdM

The first component indicates the change in vacuum field energy; the field with the specimen is the same as the field without it; the work is the work required to change the magnetization of the sample inside the solenoid without this term.

W=μ0HdM

where W=-PVis substituted for the work from part (b) to obtain (notice that Hmis the enthalpy and the subset e is used to differentiate between the enthalpy and the magnetic field):

Hm=U-μ0HM

05

Part (c) - Step 5: To Find 

What is the thermodynamic identity for this system?

06

Part (c) - Step 6: Explanation 

The total entropy change is equal to the change in the system's entropy including the change in the coil's entropy.

dS=dSU+dSM

where,

dSU=dUT

and,

dSM=-WT=μ0HdMT

hence,

dS=dUT-μ0HdMT

Note that the work, entropy, is a change in the entropy dSM, since as the magnetization of the system increases, the entropy decreases (the disorderness), and thus both sides are multiplied by T to get:

dU=TdS+μ0HdM

07

Part (d) - Step 7: To find

How would you define analogues of the enthalpy and Gibbs free energy for a magnetic system? and also Derive the thermodynamic identities for each of these quantities.

08

Part (d) - Step 8: Explanation

We have the following definition of enthalpy:

H=U+PV=U-W

We get: for an infinitesimal change in enthalpy:

dHm=dU-μ0HdM-μ0MdH

substitute from part (c) with dUto get:

dHm=TdS+μ0HdM-μ0HdM-μ0MdHdHm=TdS-μ0MdH

The Helmholtz free energy is given as follows:

F=U-TS

for a small change we have:

dF=dU-TdS-SdT

substitute from part (c) to get:

role="math" localid="1648491943269" F=TdS+μ0HdM-TdS-SdTdF=μ0HdM-SdT......(3)

The Gibbs free energy is given as follows:

G=F-TS

substitute with SM=W/T=μ0HM/Tto get:

G=F-μ0HM

for a small change we have:

dG=dF-μ0HdM-μ0MdH

substitute from (3) to get:

G=μ0HdM-SdT-μ0HdM-μ0MdHdG=-SdT-μ0MdH

01

Part (a) - Step 1: To find

we have to show thatWtot.=HVdB

02

Part (a) - Step 2: Explanation

Any change in the magnetic environment of a coil of wire will cause a voltage (emf) to be "generated" in the coil, according to Faraday's law. And the magnitude of the induced emf can be calculated as follows:

E=NdΦBdt

Here, ΦB=ABis the magnetic flux, so:

role="math" localid="1648489677675" E=NAdBdt.....(1)

The induced emf multiplied by the current flowing through the coil equals the coil's power, so:

role="math" localid="1648489689715" P=EIP=NAIdBdt......(2)

Whether or not the specimen is present, the magnetic field H inside the coil is NI/L. Substitute the following into (2):

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Go through the arithmetic to verify that diamond becomes more stable than graphite at approximately 15 kbar.

An inventor proposes to make a heat engine using water/ice as the working substance, taking advantage of the fact that water expands as it freezes. A weight to be lifted is placed on top of a piston over a cylinder of water at 1°C. The system is then placed in thermal contact with a low-temperature reservoir at -1°C until the water freezes into ice, lifting the weight. The weight is then removed and the ice is melted by putting it in contact with a high-temperature reservoir at 1°C. The inventor is pleased with this device because it can seemingly perform an unlimited amount of work while absorbing only a finite amount of heat. Explain the flaw in the inventor's reasoning, and use the Clausius-Clapeyron relation to prove that the maximum efficiency of this engine is still given by the Carnot formula, 1 -Te/Th

As you can see from Figure5.20,5.20,the critical point is the unique point on the original van der Walls isotherms (before the Maxwell construction) where both the first and second derivatives ofPPwith respect toVV(at fixedTT) are zero. Use this fact to show that

Vc=3Nb, Pc =127ab2 and kTc=827ab

In Problem 1.40 you calculated the atmospheric temperature gradient required for unsaturated air to spontaneously undergo convection. When a rising air mass becomes saturated, however, the condensing water droplets will give up energy, thus slowing the adiabatic cooling process.

(a) Use the first law of thermodynamics to show that, as condensation forms during adiabatic expansion, the temperature of an air mass changes by dT=27TPdP-27LnRdnw

where nw is the number of moles of water vapor present, L is the latent heat of vaporization per mole, and I've assumed f=7/5for air.

(b) Assuming that the air is always saturated during this process, the ratio nw/n is a known function of temperature and pressure. Carefully express dnw/dz in terms of dP/dzanddT/dz, and the vapor pressure PvT. Use the Clausius-Clapeyron relation to eliminate dP/dT.

(c) Combine the results of parts (a) and (b) to obtain a formula relating the temperature gradient, dT/dz, to the pressure gradient, dP/dz. Eliminate Figure 5.18. Cumulus clouds form when rising air expands adiabatically and cools to the dew point (Problem 5.44); the onset of condensation slows the cooling, increasing the tendency of the air to rise further (Problem 5.45). These clouds began to form in late morning, in a sky that was clear only an hour before the photo was taken. By mid-afternoon they had developed into thunderstorms. the latter using the "barometric equation" from Problem 1.16. You should finally obtain dTdz=-27MgR1+PvPLRT1+27PvPLRT2

where " width="9">

(d) Calculate the wet adiabatic lapse rate at atmospheric pressure (I bar) and 25°C, then at atmospheric pressure and 0°C. Explain why the results are different, and discuss their implications. What happens at higher altitudes, where the pressure is lower?

The partial-derivative relations derived in Problems 1.46,3.33, and 5.12, plus a bit more partial-derivative trickery, can be used to derive a completely general relation between CPandCV.

(a) With the heat capacity expressions from Problem 3.33 in mind, first considerSto be a function of TandV.Expand dSin terms of the partial derivatives (∂S/∂T)Vand (∂S/∂V)T. Note that one of these derivatives is related toCV

(b) To bring in CP, considerlocalid="1648430264419" Vto be a function ofTand P and expand dV in terms of partial derivatives in a similar way. Plug this expression for dV into the result of part (a), then set dP=0and note that you have derived a nontrivial expression for (∂S/∂T)P. This derivative is related to CP, so you now have a formula for the difference CP-CV

(c) Write the remaining partial derivatives in terms of measurable quantities using a Maxwell relation and the result of Problem 1.46. Your final result should be

CP=CV+TVβ2κT

(d) Check that this formula gives the correct value of CP-CVfor an ideal gas.

(e) Use this formula to argue that CPcannot be less than CV.

(f) Use the data in Problem 1.46 to evaluateCP-CVfor water and for mercury at room temperature. By what percentage do the two heat capacities differ?

(g) Figure 1.14 shows measured values of CPfor three elemental solids, compared to predicted values of CV. It turns out that a graph of βvs.T for a solid has same general appearance as a graph of heat capacity. Use this fact to explain why CPand CVagree at low temperatures but diverge in the way they do at higher temperatures.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.