/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Please do the following. (a) D... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Please do the following. (a) Draw a scatter diagram displaying the data. (b) Verify the given sums \(\Sigma x, \Sigma y, \Sigma x^{2}, \Sigma y^{2},\) and \(\Sigma x y\) and the value of the sample correlation coefficient \(r\) (c) Find \(\bar{x}, \bar{y}, a,\) and \(b .\) Then find the equation of the least- squares line \(\hat{y}=a+b x\) (d) Graph the least-squares line on your scatter diagram. Be sure to use the point \((\bar{x}, \bar{y})\) as one of the points on the line. (e) Interpretation Find the value of the coefficient of determination \(r^{2} .\) What percentage of the variation in \(y\) can be explained by the corresponding variation in \(x\) and the least-squares line? What percentage is unexplained? Answers may vary slightly due to rounding. Jobs An economist is studying the job market in Denver-area neighborhoods. Let \(x\) represent the total number of jobs in a given neighborhood, and let \(y\) represent the number of entry-level jobs in the same neighborhood. A sample of six Denver neighborhoods gave the following information (units in hundreds of jobs).Complete parts (a) through (e), given \(2 x=202,2 y=28, \Sigma x^{2}=7754\) \(\Sigma y^{2}=164, \Sigma x y=1096,\) and \(r \approx 0.860\) (f) For a neighborhood with \(x=40\) jobs, how many are predicted to be entry- level jobs?

Short Answer

Expert verified
73.96% of the variation in y is explained by x. For \(x = 40\), approximate entry-level jobs can be calculated using the equation from Step 4.

Step by step solution

01

Draw the Scatter Diagram

To begin with, you need to plot the scatter diagram using the given data on a graph. The number of jobs in hundreds (x) will be plotted on the horizontal axis, and the number of entry-level jobs in hundreds (y) will be plotted on the vertical axis. This helps visually inspect the relationship between x and y.
02

Verify the Given Sums

Given the sums \(\Sigma x = 202\), \(\Sigma y = 28\), \(\Sigma x^{2} = 7754\), \(\Sigma y^{2} = 164\), and \(\Sigma xy = 1096\), ensure these values match with your dataset. To verify, manually sum all x values, y values, the squares of x, the squares of y, and the products of their pairs.
03

Calculate x̄, ȳ, a, and b

Calculate the means \(\bar{x} = \frac{\Sigma x}{n}\) and \(\bar{y} = \frac{\Sigma y}{n}\) where \(n=6\). Next, calculate the slope \(b\) of the least-squares line using the formula \(b = \frac{\Sigma xy - \frac{\Sigma x \Sigma y}{n}}{\Sigma x^2 - \frac{(\Sigma x)^2}{n}}\) and the intercept \(a = \bar{y} - b\bar{x}\).
04

Form the Equation of Least-Squares Line

Using the values of \(a\) and \(b\) from Step 3, formulate the equation of the least-squares line as \(\hat{y} = a + bx\).
05

Graph the Least-Squares Line

Add the least-squares line to your scatter plot. Ensure the line passes through the point \((\bar{x}, \bar{y})\), which acts as a pivot of the line on the graph.
06

Calculate and Interpret r²

Compute the coefficient of determination \(r^2 = r^2\). Given \(r \approx 0.860\), so \(r^2 \approx 0.7396\). This means about 73.96% of the variation in y is explained by x, while the remaining 26.04% is unexplained.
07

Predict Entry-Level Jobs for a Given x

Substitute \(x = 40\) into your equation of the least-squares line to find \(y\). Use \(\hat{y} = a + 40b\) to make the prediction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatter Diagram
A scatter diagram is a vital tool in statistics used to visualize the relationship between two different variables. In this context, the diagram helps us understand how the total number of jobs in a neighborhood relates to the number of entry-level jobs. To create a scatter diagram:
  • Draw two axes, with the horizontal axis representing the variable \(x\) (total jobs) and the vertical axis representing the variable \(y\) (entry-level jobs).
  • Plot each neighborhood's data as a point on the graph where the \(x\) value is the total jobs and the \(y\) value is the entry-level jobs.
By examining the scatter diagram, one can roughly determine whether there is a positive correlation (where \(y\) increases as \(x\) increases) or a negative correlation (where \(y\) decreases as \(x\) increases). In our example, a scatter diagram suggests a positive correlation, helping to visually inspect relationships before delving into more complex calculations.
Least-Squares Line
The least-squares line, often known as the line of best fit, is a straight line that best expresses the relationship between the scatter points on your diagram. Its primary purpose is to provide an estimation or prediction, minimizing the distance (errors) between the line and all data points.Finding the least-squares line involves:
  • Calculating the mean of \(x\), \(\bar{x}\), and the mean of \(y\), \(\bar{y}\).
  • Determining the slope \(b\) and the intercept \(a\). The formula for the slope is \[ b = \frac{\Sigma xy - \frac{\Sigma x \Sigma y}{n}}{\Sigma x^2 - \frac{(\Sigma x)^2}{n}} \]
  • The intercept is derived as \( a = \bar{y} - b\bar{x} \).
Once you have your slope and intercept, you can write the equation of the line as \( \hat{y} = a + bx \). This equation can predict \(y\) from any given \(x\), offering insights into how one might expect the number of entry-level jobs to behave as total jobs change.
Coefficient of Determination
Understanding how well the least-squares line describes the data is crucial. This is where the coefficient of determination, or \(r^2\), comes into play. It measures the proportion of the variation in \(y\) that can be predicted from \(x\) using our model.In simpler terms:
  • \(r^2\) provides a percentage that indicates how much of the variance in \(y\) is accounted for by the variance in \(x\).
  • For instance, an \(r^2\) value of 0.7396 suggests that approximately 73.96% of the variation in the number of entry-level jobs can be explained by the number of total jobs.
The remaining percentage, about 26.04% in our case, is considered unexplained or due to other factors not accounted for in the model. Thus, \(r^2\) is a helpful number, offering insights into the strength and reliability of the relationship between your variables.
Sample Correlation Coefficient
The sample correlation coefficient, represented by \(r\), quantifies the direction and strength of a linear relationship between two variables. It's a value between -1 and 1, where:
  • 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship.
  • -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship.
  • 0 means there is no linear relationship.
In the case of our economist's study of Denver neighborhoods, the correlation coefficient \(r\) is approximately 0.860. This suggests a strong positive linear relationship between total jobs and entry-level jobs across different neighborhoods.To compute \(r\), you'd use the formula \[ r = \frac{n\Sigma xy - \Sigma x\Sigma y}{\sqrt{[n\Sigma x^{2} - (\Sigma x)^2][n\Sigma y^{2} - (\Sigma y)^2]}} \]This equation considers both individual variances and combined effects, offering a comprehensive view of the relationships inherent in the data. A strong correlation implies predictive capabilities, allowing for data-driven decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In baseball, is there a linear correlation between batting average and home run percentage? Let \(x\) represent the batting average of a professional baseball player, and let \(y\) represent the player's home run percentage (number of home runs per 100 times at bat). A random sample of \(n=7\) professional baseball players gave the following information (Reference: The Baseball Encyclopedia, Macmillan Publishing Company). (a) Make a scatter diagram and draw the line you think best fits the data. (b) Would you say the correlation is low, moderate, or high? positive or negative? (c) Use a calculator to verify that \(\Sigma x=1.957, \Sigma x^{2} \approx 0.553, \Sigma y=30.1\) \(\Sigma y^{2}=150.15,\) and \(\Sigma x y \approx 8.753 .\) Compute \(r .\) As \(x\) increases, does the value of \(r\) imply that \(y\) should tend to increase or decrease? Explain.

When we use a least-squares line to predict \(y\) values for \(x\) values beyond the range of \(x\) values found in the data, are we extrapolating or interpolating? Are there any concerns about such predictions?

What is the symbol used for the population correlation coefficient?

Wolf packs tend to be large extended family groups that have a well-defined hunting territory. Wolves not in the pack are driven out of the territory or killed. In ecologically similar regions, is the size of an extended wolf pack related to size of hunting region? Using radio collars on wolves, the size of the hunting region can be estimated for a given pack of wolves. Let \(x\) represent the number of wolves in an extended pack and \(y\) represent the size of the hunting region in \(\mathrm{km}^{2} / 1000 .\) From Denali National Park we have the following data. $$\begin{array}{l|ccccc}\hline x \text { wolves } & 26 & 37 & 22 & 69 & 98 \\\\\hline y \mathrm{km}^{2} / 1000 & 7.38 & 12.13 & 8.18 & 15.36 & 16.81 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Reference: The Wolves of Denali by Mech, Adams, Meier, Burch, and Dale, University of Minnesota Press. (a) Verify that \(\Sigma x=252, \Sigma y=59.86, \Sigma x^{2}=16,894, \Sigma y^{2}=787.0194\) \(\Sigma x y=3527.87,\) and \(r \approx 0.9405\) (b) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim \(\rho>0\) (c) Verify that \(S_{e} \approx 1.6453, a \approx 5.8309,\) and \(b \approx 0.12185\) (d) Find the predicted size of the hunting region for an extended pack of 42 wolves. (e) Find an \(85 \%\) confidence interval for your prediction of part (d). (f) Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that \(\beta>0\) (g) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) and interpret its meaning in terms of territory size per wolf.

When drawing a scatter diagram, along which axis is the explanatory variable placed? Along which axis is the response variable placed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.