/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Confidence Interval for \(\mu_{1... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Confidence Interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) Consider two independent normal distributions. A random sample of size \(n_{1}=20\) from the first distribution showed \(\bar{x}_{1}=12\) and a random sample of size \(n_{2}=25\) from the second distribution showed \(\bar{x}_{2}=14\) (a)If \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\) are known, what distribution does \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) follow? Explain. (b) Given \(\sigma_{1}=3\) and \(\sigma_{2}=4,\) find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) (c) Suppose \(\sigma_{1}\) and \(\sigma_{2}\) are both unknown, but from the random samples, you know \(s_{1}=3\) and \(s_{2}=4 .\) What distribution approximates the \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) distribution? What are the degrees of freedom? Explain. (d) With \(s_{1}=3\) and \(s_{2}=4,\) find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) (e) If you have an appropriate calculator or computer software, find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using degrees of freedom based on Satterthwaite's approximation. (f) Based on the confidence intervals you computed, can you be \(90 \%\) confident that \(\mu_{1}\) is smaller than \(\mu_{2} ?\) Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, \( \mu_1 \) is likely smaller than \( \mu_2 \) as all intervals are negative.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Distribution for Known Variances

Since both populations are normally distributed and the population variances \( \sigma_1 \) and \( \sigma_2 \) are known, the difference \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \) will follow a normal distribution. This is due to the Central Limit Theorem, which holds even for small sample sizes when populations are normally distributed.
02

Calculate the 90% Confidence Interval with Known Variances

The standard error \(SE\) for the difference in means is calculated as \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}} = \sqrt{\frac{3^2}{20} + \frac{4^2}{25}} = \sqrt{0.45 + 0.64} = \sqrt{1.09} \approx 1.044. \] The critical value for a 90% confidence interval is 1.645 (Z-value). Thus, the confidence interval is \( (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm 1.645 \times SE \). Calculating gives \[ (12 - 14) \pm 1.645 \times 1.044 = -2 \pm 1.717. \] So the interval is approximately \((-3.717, -0.283)\).
03

Distribution for Unknown Variances

When both \( \sigma_1 \) and \( \sigma_2 \) are unknown, the distribution of \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \) can be approximated by a t-distribution. The approximate degrees of freedom (\(df\)) can be calculated using Satterthwaite's approximation.
04

Calculate Approximate Degrees of Freedom

Satterthwaite's approximation for \(df\) is \[ df = \frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{\frac{(s_1^2/n_1)^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{(s_2^2/n_2)^2}{n_2 - 1}} \] which equals \[ df = \frac{(\frac{9}{20} + \frac{16}{25})^2}{\frac{(9/20)^2}{19} + \frac{(16/25)^2}{24}} \approx 36.2. \] You would typically round down to the nearest whole number, giving 36 degrees of freedom.
05

Compute the Confidence Interval for Unknown Variances

Using the t-distribution with 36 degrees of freedom, we find a critical value of approximately 1.690 for a 90% confidence level. The confidence interval is calculated as \( (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm 1.690 \times SE \), where \( SE = 1.044 \). Thus \[ -2 \pm 1.690 \times 1.044 = -2 \pm 1.763. \] The interval is approximately \((-3.763, -0.237)\).
06

Confidence Interval using Satterthwaite's Approximation

Using computer software to apply Satterthwaite's approximation, the 90% confidence interval for \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) might show slight variations around the hand-calculated interval due to nuances in the computational approach.
07

Interpret the Confidence Intervals

All calculated confidence intervals for \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) do not include zero and are entirely negative, suggesting with 90% confidence that \( \mu_1 \) is less than \( \mu_2 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Distribution
In statistics, a normal distribution is a common probability distribution characterized by its bell-shaped curve, often called a Gaussian distribution. When you have large samples or distributions established to be normal, such as in the case where the variances are known and populations are normal, the difference in sample means, noted as \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \), will itself follow a normal distribution.

This allows us to utilize the normal distribution directly to create confidence intervals if we know the standard deviations of the two populations. You can calculate the confidence interval using the z-score, which represents standard deviations away from the mean in a normal distribution.

For example, with a 90% confidence level, you may use a z-value of 1.645 to determine the range in which the true difference in population means is expected to fall.

Normal distribution assumptions become crucial because they simplify calculations and provide a strong foundation for understanding the probability of certain outcomes based upon sample data. Understanding this foundation lets us confidently make predictions and interpretations.
T-Distribution
A t-distribution is closely related to the normal distribution but is used in scenarios where sample sizes are small, and population variances are unknown. This distribution is wider and fatter-tailed, reflecting the greater uncertainty when estimates are based on small samples.

When determining a confidence interval for \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \) with unknown variances, we approximate the distribution with a t-distribution. This involves using sample standard deviations \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) instead of the known population standard deviations \( \sigma_1 \) and \( \sigma_2 \).

For calculations involving two samples, you'll use a specific critical value from the t-distribution, determined by degrees of freedom which influences the distribution's shape. When sample sizes are small or variances are not known, the t-distribution provides a more accurate reflection of the data's potential variability than narrowly estimating through a normal distribution.

Grasping t-distribution concepts is critical when working with real-world data, where assumptions about population parameters often cannot be precisely known.
Satterthwaite's Approximation
When dealing with t-distributions for the difference between two means, calculating the degrees of freedom is slightly more complex due to the variability introduced by having two sample standard deviations. Satterthwaite's approximation provides a method to determine these approximate degrees of freedom.

This approach combines the variances of the two samples, adjusted by their respective sizes, to result in a single number representing the overall degrees of freedom for the comparison. The formula might look complex but effectively unifies the uncertainty propagated from estimating two separate population measures with limited data.

Using Satterthwaite's approximation permits more refined use of the t-distribution in constructing confidence intervals. By reflecting the actual variability more accurately than simpler methods, it ensures the confidence intervals calculated are as precise as possible given the available information.

It’s essential to use tools or software that can handle these calculations when your datasets become complex, ensuring your statistical conclusions are based on sound mathematical footing.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a fundamental theorem in statistics. It states that, given a sufficiently large sample size from a population with a finite level of variance, the mean of all samples will be approximately normally distributed. This holds true regardless of the actual distribution of the population being studied.

In our case, when sample means \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) come from independent normal populations, CLT justifies using normal approximation for smaller sample sizes because the population was initially normal. This theorem enables statisticians to use what they know about normal distributions to make inferences about sample means even when dealing with variations in sample size.

As sample sizes grow, the approximation becomes even more accurate, making CLT both powerful and versatile, a cornerstone of practical applied statistics. Understanding CLT aids in explaining why certain central tendencies can be assumed even when full population data is unavailable, making statistical analyses of real-world data more feasible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Isabel Myers was a pioneer in the study of personality types. The following information is taken from \(A\) Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers- Briggs Type Indicator by Myers and McCaulley (Consulting Psychologists Press). In a random sample of 62 professional actors, it was found that 39 were extroverts. (a) Let \(p\) represent the proportion of all actors who are extroverts. Find a point estimate for \(p\). (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p\). Give a brief interpretation of the meaning of the confidence interval you have found. (c) Do you think the conditions \(n p > 5\) and \(n q >5 \) are satisfied in this problem? Explain why this would be an important consideration.

Jerry tested 30 laptop computers owned by classmates enrolled in a large computer science class and discovered that 22 were infected with keystroke- tracking spyware. Is it appropriate for Jerry to use his data to estimate the proportion of all laptops infected with such spyware? Explain.

What about the sample size \(n\) for confidence intervals for the difference of proportions \(p_{1}-p_{2} ?\) Let us make the following assumptions: equal sample sizes \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) and all four quantities \(n_{1} \hat{p}_{1}, n_{1} \hat{q}_{1}, n_{2} \hat{p}_{2},\) and \(n_{2} \hat{q}_{2}\) are greater than \(5 .\) Those readers familiar with algebra can use the procedure outlined in Problem 28 to show that if we have preliminary estimates \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\) and a given maximal margin of error \(E\) for a specified confidence level \(c,\) then the sample size \(n\) should be at least $$n=\left(\frac{z_{c}}{E}\right)^{2}\left(\hat{p}_{1} \hat{q}_{1}+\hat{p}_{2} \hat{q}_{2}\right)$$ However, if we have no preliminary estimates for \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\), then the theory similar to that used in this section tells us that the sample size \(n\) should be at least $$n=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{z_{c}}{F}\right)^{2}$$ (a) In Problem 17 (Myers-Briggs personality type indicators in common for married couples), suppose we want to be \(99 \%\) confident that our estimate \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) for the difference \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) has a maximal margin of error \(E=0.04 .\) Use the preliminary estimates \(\hat{p}_{1}=289 / 375\) for the proportion of couples sharing two personality traits and \(\hat{p}_{2}=23 / 571\) for the proportion having no traits in common. How large should the sample size be (assuming equal sample size-i.e., \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) )? (b) Suppose that in Problem 17 we have no preliminary estimates for \(\hat{p}_{1}\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}\) and we want to be \(95 \%\) confident that our estimate \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) for the difference \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) has a maximal margin of error \(E=0.05 .\) How large should the sample size be (assuming equal sample size-i.e., \(n=n_{1}=n_{2}\) )?

What price do farmers get for their watermelon crops? In the third week of July, a random sample of 40 farming regions gave a sample mean of \(\bar{x}=\6.88\) per 100 pounds of watermelon. Assume that \(\sigma\) is known to be \(1.92\) per 100 pounds (Reference: Agricultural Statistics\(,\) U.S. Department of Agriculture). (a) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean price (per 100 pounds) that farmers in this region get for their watermelon crop. What is the margin of error? (b) Sample Size Find the sample size necessary for a \(90 \%\) confidence level with maximal margin of error \(E=0.3\) for the mean price per 100 pounds of watermelon. (c) A farm brings 15 tons of watermelon to market. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population mean cash value of this crop. What is the margin of error? Hint: 1 ton is 2000 pounds.

S. C. Jett is a professor of geography at the University of California, Davis. He and a colleague, V. E. Spencer, are experts on modern Navajo culture and geography. The following information is taken from their book Navajo Architecture: Forms, History, Distributions (University of Arizona Press). On the Navajo Reservation, a random sample of 210 permanent dwellings in the Fort Defiance region showed that 65 were traditional Navajo hogans. In the Indian Wells region, a random sample of 152 permanent dwellings showed that 18 were traditional hogans. Let \(p_{1}\) be the population proportion of all traditional hogans in the Fort Defiance region, and let \(p_{2}\) be the population proportion of all traditional hogans in the Indian Wells region. (a) Can a normal distribution be used to approximate the \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\) distribution? Explain. (b) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) (c) Examine the confidence interval and comment on its meaning. Does it include numbers that are all positive? all negative? mixed? What if it is hypothesized that Navajo who follow the traditional culture of their people tend to occupy hogans? Comment on the confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) in this context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.