/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 When using the \(F\) distributio... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When using the \(F\) distribution to test two variances, is it essential that each of the two populations be normally distributed? Would it be all right if the populations had distributions that were mound-shaped and more or less symmetric?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the F-test assumes normal populations, but mound-shaped, symmetric distributions might suffice with caution.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction to the F-distribution

The F-distribution is a continuous probability distribution used primarily to compare variances. It is often used in analysis of variance (ANOVA) and in the F-test for comparing two variances. This distribution is characterized by two parameters, namely the degrees of freedom corresponding to the numerator and the denominator variances.
02

Assumption of Normality

The F-test for comparing two variances generally assumes that each of the populations being compared is normally distributed. This assumption is crucial as it ensures the validity of the test results. The test statistic follows an F-distribution under the null hypothesis only if the populations are normal.
03

Evaluating Mound-Shaped, Symmetric Distributions

While strictly, the theoretical assumption is that the populations must be normally distributed, in practice, if distributions are mound-shaped and symmetric (even if not perfectly normal), the F-test may still be reasonably robust. This is because such distributions often have properties similar to a normal distribution, such as being unimodal and having similar measures of central tendency.
04

Conclusion on Distribution Requirements

Ultimately, although the F-test assumes normality, with larger sample sizes and distributions that are symmetrical and mound-shaped, the test can still be applicable. However, caution should be exercised, and additional checks or alternative tests might be necessary if the distributions significantly deviate from normality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Distribution
The normal distribution is a fundamental concept in statistics. It's a type of continuous probability distribution recognized by its symmetrical, bell-shaped curve. This distribution plays a key role in many statistical tests, including the F-test. The importance of the normal distribution lies in its properties that symbolize the central limit theorem.
The central limit theorem suggests that when you sum up enough independent random variables, their normalized sum tends to form a normal distribution, regardless of the original distribution of the variables. This makes the normal distribution applicable in numerous scenarios across statistics.
  • Symmetry: The normal distribution is perfectly symmetrical around its mean.
  • Central Tendency: The mean, median, and mode are all equal and located at the center of the distribution.
  • Bell Shape: The total probability is contained within standard deviations from the mean, making it predictable and easy to work with.
For the F-test, normality is typically assumed. But what happens if the populations aren't perfectly normal? In practice, as long as they are mound-shaped and symmetric, the results can still be valid.
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance, better known as ANOVA, is a collection of statistical models used to analyze the differences among means of different groups. ANOVA is instrumental because it helps statistically determine if there are any statistically significant differences between the means of three or more independent groups.
In particular, ANOVA is useful because it prevents the accumulation of Type I error, which is what might happen when multiple t-tests are conducted.
  • Comparison of Means: ANOVA focuses on comparing the variance between group means to the variance within the groups.
  • F-Statistic: The F-statistic is a ratio of variances and is used to decide whether the observed variances between groups can be attributed to differences in the group means.
  • Assumptions: ANOVA assumes normally distributed populations and equal variances across them, but it is fairly robust to deviations from normality with a larger sample size.
ANOVA itself relies on the F-distribution to provide an F-statistic, hence solidifying the close-knit relationship these statistical tools share.
F-test
The F-test is a statistical test used to determine if two population variances are significantly different. It forms the backbone of various analyses, including ANOVA. The F-test is utilized where there is a need to compare the variances by using the F-distribution as a reference.
Here's what makes the F-test critically important:
  • Variance Comparison: It allows researchers to compare the spread or variability of data sets.
  • Hypothesis Testing: The null hypothesis for an F-test typically states that the variances are equal across populations.
  • F-distribution: The test statistic from an F-test is expected to follow an F-distribution if the null hypothesis is true.
However, the classic F-test requires that the populations being compared are normal. This is why practitioners often emphasize using it on populations that are either normal or closely resemble a symmetrical, mound-shaped distribution.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom are vital in the context of statistical tests. They represent the number of values in a calculation that are free to vary. In the realm of the F-test and ANOVA, degrees of freedom play a substantial role in determining the shape of the F-distribution.
  • Definition: In statistical terms, degrees of freedom refer to the number of independent pieces of information in a data set used for estimation.
  • Numerator and Denominator: The F-distribution is characterized by two distinct degrees of freedom—one for the numerator and one for the denominator derived from the variances.
  • Significance: They help to tailor the F-distribution to match the specific conditions of your data, influencing the critical values needed for hypothesis testing.
Understanding degrees of freedom helps in accurately interpreting the results from F-tests and ANOVA. They let researchers know how much flexibility there is when estimating statistical parameters.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following problem is based on information taken from Academe, Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors. Let \(x\) represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of \(x\) is approximately \(\sigma^{2}=47.1 .\) However, a random sample of 15 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that \(x\) has a sample variance \(s^{2}=83.2 .\) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is greater than \(47.1 .\) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

Economics: Profits per Employee How productive are U.S. workers? One way to answer this question is to study annual profits per employee. A random sample of companies in computers (I), aerospace (II), heavy equipment (III), and broadcasting (IV) gave the following data regarding annual profits per employee (units in thousands of dollars) (Source: Forbes Top Companies, edited by J. T. Davis, John Wiley and Sons).$$\begin{array}{cccc}\mathbf{I} & \mathbf{I I} & \mathbf{I I I} & \mathbf{I V} \\\27.8 & 13.3 & 22.3 & 17.1 \\\23.8 & 9.9 & 20.9 & 16.9 \\\14.1 & 11.7 & 7.2 & 14.3 \\\8.8 & 8.6 & 12.8 & 15.2 \\\11.9 & 6.6 & 7.0 & 10.1 \end{array}$$. Shall we reject or not reject the claim that there is no difference in population mean annual profits per employee in each of the four types of companies? Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

A random sample of leading companies in South Korea gave the following percentage yields based on assets (see reference in Problem 7): $$\begin{array}{cc} 2.5 & 2.0 & 4.5 & 1.8 & 0.5 & 3.6 & 2.4 \\ 0.2 & 1.7 & 1.8 & 1.4 & 5.4 &1.1 \end{array}$$ Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=2.247\) for these South Korean companies. Another random sample of leading companies in Sweden gave the following percentage yields based on assets: $$\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 2.3 & 3.2 & 3.6 & 1.2 & 3.6 & 2.8 & 2.3 & 3.5 & 2.8 \end{array}$$ Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2}=0.624\) for these Swedish companies. Test the claim that the population variance of percentage yields on assets for South Korean companies is higher than that for companies in Sweden. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to an economist's question regarding volatility of corporate productivity of large companies in South Korea compared with that in Sweden?

For the study regarding mean cadence (see Problem 1), two-way ANOVA was used. Recall that the two factors were walking device (none, standard walker, rolling walker) and dual task (being required to respond vocally to a signal or no dual task required). Results of two-way ANOVA showed that there was no evidence of interaction between the factors. However, according to the article, "The ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device." When the hypothesis regarding no difference in mean cadence according to which, if any, walking device was used, the sample \(F\) was \(30.94,\) with \(d, f_{N}=2\) and \(d . f_{. D}=18\) Further, the \(P\) -value for the result was reported to be less than \(0.01 .\) From this information, what is the conclusion regarding any difference in mean cadence according to the factor "walking device used"?

Rothamsted Experimental Station (England) has studied wheat production since \(1852 .\) Each year, many small plots of equal size but different soil/fertilizer conditions are planted with wheat. At the end of the growing season, the yield (in pounds) of the wheat on the plot is measured. The following data are based on information taken from an article by G. A. Wiebe in the Journal of Agricultural Research (Vol. \(50,\) pp. \(331-357\) ). For a random sample of years, one plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds): $$\begin{array}{lllllll} 4.15 & 4.21 & 4.27 & 3.55 & 3.50 & 3.79 & 4.09 & 4.42 \\ 3.89 & 3.87 & 4.12 & 3.09 & 4.86 & 2.90 & 5.01 & 3.39 \end{array}$$ Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is \(s^{2} \approx 0.332\) Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds): $$\begin{array}{llllllll} 4.03 & 3.77 & 3.49 & 3.76 & 3.61 & 3.72 & 4.13 & 4.01 \\ 3.59 & 4.29 & 3.78 & 3.19 & 3.84 & 3.91 & 3.66 & 4.35 \end{array}$$ Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance for this plot is \(s^{2} \approx 0.089\) Test the claim that the population variance of annual wheat production for the first plot is larger than that for the second plot. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.