/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Please provide the following inf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. Are all the expected frequencies greater than \(5 ?\) What sampling distribution will you use? What are the degrees of freedom? (c) Find or estimate the \(P\) -value of the sample test statistic. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories? (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Accounting Records: Benford's Law Benford's Law states that the first nonzero digits of numbers drawn at random from a large complex data file have the following probability distribution (Reference: American Statistical Association, Chance, Vol. \(12,\) No. \(3,\) pp. \(27-31 ;\) see also the Focus Problem of Chapter 9). Suppose that \(n=275\) numerical entries were drawn at random from a large accounting file of a major corporation. The first nonzero digits were recorded for the sample. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the distribution of first nonzero digits in this accounting file follows Benford's Law.

Short Answer

Expert verified
With a 1% significance level, if the P-value is below 0.01, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, do not reject it.

Step by step solution

01

Define Significance Level and Hypotheses

The level of significance is given as \( % \). This implies a threshold below which we will reject the null hypothesis if the \( P \)-value is smaller. The null hypothesis \((H_0)\) states that the distribution of the first nonzero digits in the accounting file follows Benford's Law. The alternative hypothesis \((H_a)\) claims that the distribution does not follow Benford's Law.
02

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic

To calculate the chi-square statistic, use the formula: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \]where \( O_i \) is the observed frequency, and \( E_i \) is the expected frequency according to Benford's Law. Ensure that all expected frequencies \( E_i > 5 \). If they are, use the chi-square distribution for analysis. With 9 categories (digits 1-9) minus 1 for the constraint, the degrees of freedom are \( df = 9 - 1 = 8 \).
03

Estimate the P-value

Determine the \( P \)-value from the calculated chi-square statistic and the distribution with 8 degrees of freedom. This can be done using statistical tables or chi-square distribution software.
04

Decision on Hypothesis

If the \( P \)-value is less than the significance level of \( 0.01 \), reject the null hypothesis \((H_0)\). Otherwise, fail to reject \(H_0\).
05

Conclusion Interpretation

If the null hypothesis is rejected, conclude that the distribution of first nonzero digits in the accounting file does not follow Benford’s Law. If not rejected, there is insufficient evidence to conclude otherwise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test
The Chi-Square Test is a statistical method designed to assess the differences between observed and expected frequencies in categorical data. It's particularly useful when you want to evaluate whether the observed data fits a certain distribution. In the context of Benford's Law, we use the Chi-Square Test to see if the actual distribution of numbers in an accounting file matches the expected distribution based on Benford’s probabilities.

To conduct the Chi-Square Test, we start by calculating the Chi-Square statistic using the formula:
  • \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \] where \( O_i \) are the observed frequencies, and \( E_i \) are the expected frequencies.

Next, we make sure that all expected frequencies are greater than 5 to ensure the validity of the test. Then, we determine the degrees of freedom, which in this case is the number of categories minus one. For digits 1-9, there are 9 categories, so the degrees of freedom is 8.

Finally, using the calculated Chi-Square statistic and the degrees of freedom, we find the \( P \)-value to make a decision about our hypothesis.
Benford's Law
Benford's Law is a fascinating principle that predicts the frequency of the first digits in naturally occurring sets of numbers. According to this law, lower digits like 1 or 2 are much more likely to appear as the leading digit than higher ones like 8 or 9. Specifically, number 1 appears as the first digit about 30% of the time, while number 9 does so less than 5% of the time.

This law applies to many datasets, from populations of countries to financial records. It works best with data that span several orders of magnitude and isn't contrived or manipulated for consistency. In scenarios such as an accounting file with numerous entries, test whether this law fits the distribution of initial nonzero digits, ensuring the records follow natural growth patterns.

Using Benford's Law can be a helpful tool, especially in auditing, to detect anomalies such as fraudulent data, thereby maintaining the integrity of large datasets.
Null and Alternate Hypotheses
Hypotheses form the foundation of hypothesis testing in statistics. The null hypothesis \((H_0)\) is a default claim that there's no effect or difference, and in this case, it asserts that the first digits in the data follow Benford's Law. By contrast, the alternative hypothesis \((H_a)\) claims that the data do not conform to Benford's Law.

When we set up these hypotheses, we're essentially defining what conclusion to draw when we perform our statistical test. If our \( P \)-value ends up being lower than the significance threshold, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.

Understanding these hypotheses is crucial because they determine the direction and intention of our statistical test. They guide researchers in assessing whether the patterns observed in the data are due to chance or some systematic effect.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold in hypothesis testing that indicates how strong the evidence must be before rejecting the null hypothesis. In this context, a 1% significance level means you require very strong evidence to claim that the distribution does not follow Benford's Law.

This level is set before conducting the test to limit the probability of making a Type I error, which is mistakenly rejecting a true null hypothesis. The lower the significance level, the stricter the test, making it less likely to identify what appears to be a statistically significant difference as meaningful if it isn’t.

Setting a 1% significance level reflects a conservative approach, ensuring that the findings are only considered significant if the evidence is compelling. It’s crucial to choose an appropriate significance level considering the context and potential consequences of the test results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A new kind of typhoid shot is being developed by a medical research team. The old typhoid shot was known to protect the population for a mean time of 36 months, with a standard deviation of 3 months. To test the time variability of the new shot, a random sample of 23 people were given the new shot. Regular blood tests showed that the sample standard deviation of protection times was 1.9 months. Using a 0.05 level of significance, test the claim that the new typhoid shot has a smaller variance of protection times. Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population standard deviation.

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. Are all the expected frequencies greater than \(5 ?\) What sampling distribution will you use? What are the degrees of freedom? (c) Find or estimate the \(P\) -value of the sample test statistic. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories? (e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Ecology: Fish The Fish and Game Department stocked Lake Lulu with fish in the following proportions: \(30 \%\) catfish, \(15 \%\) bass, \(40 \%\) bluegill, and \(15 \%\) pike. Five years later it sampled the lake to see if the distribution of fish had changed. It found that the 500 fish in the sample were distributed as follows. \(\begin{array}{cccc}\text { Catfish } & \text { Bass } & \text { Bluegill } & \text { Pike } \\ 120 & 85 & 220 & 75\end{array}\) In the 5 -year interval, did the distribution of fish change at the 0.05 level?

The following table shows ceremonial ranking and type of pottery sherd for a random sample of 434 sherds at a location in the Sand Canyon Archaeological Project, Colorado (The Architecture of Social Integration in Prehistoric Pueblos, edited by Lipe and Hegmon). $$\begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Ceremonial } \\ \text { Ranking } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Cooking Jar } \\ \text { Sherds } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Decorated Jar Sherds } \\ \text { (Noncooking) } \end{array} & \text { Row Total } \\ \hline \mathrm{A} & 86 & 49 & 135 \\ \hline \mathrm{B} & 92 & 53 & 145 \\ \hline \mathrm{C} & 79 & 75 & 154 \\ \hline \text { Column Total } & 257 & 177 & 434 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Use a chi-square test to determine if ceremonial ranking and pottery type are independent at the 0.05 level of significance.

The following problem is based on information from an article by N. Keyfitz in the American Journal of Sociology (Vol. \(53,\) pp. \(470-480\) ). Let \(x=\) age in years of a rural Quebec woman at the time of her first marriage. In the year \(1941,\) the population variance of \(x\) was approximately \(\sigma^{2}=5.1 .\) Suppose a recent study of age at first marriage for a random sample of 41 women in rural Quebec gave a sample variance \(s^{2}=3.3 .\) Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the current variance is less than \(5.1 .\) Find a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and the new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 21 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(5.1 .\) Another, similar frozen food case was equipped with the old thermostat, and a random sample of 16 temperature readings gave a sample variance of \(12.8 .\) Test the claim that the population variance of the old thermostat temperature readings is larger than that for the new thermostat. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question regarding the dependability of the temperature readings?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.