/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Consider a test for \(\mu\). If ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a test for \(\mu\). If the \(P\) -value is such that you can reject \(H_{0}\) at the \(5 \%\) level of significance, can you always reject \(H_{0}\) at the \(1 \%\) level of significance? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, you cannot always reject \(H_0\) at the 1% level if you reject at the 5% level.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Hypotheses Testing

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) is the statement currently believed to be true. A significance level (\(\alpha\)) is a threshold probability for rejecting \(H_0\). Common levels are 5% and 1%.
02

Defining P-value

A \(P\)-value indicates the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming \(H_0\) is true. A smaller \(P\)-value suggests stronger evidence against \(H_0\).
03

P-value and Significance Levels

At a 5% significance level, we reject \(H_0\) if \(P\)-value is less than 0.05. At a 1% significance level, we only reject \(H_0\) if \(P\)-value is less than 0.01. Therefore, rejecting \(H_0\) at 5% does not guarantee rejection at 1% unless \(P\)-value is also below 0.01.
04

Summary

When the \(P\)-value is between 0.01 and 0.05, \(H_0\) can be rejected at a 5% level, but not at a 1% level. Only if the \(P\)-value is below 0.01 will \(H_0\) be rejected at both significance levels.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
The "P-value" is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing used to determine the strength of evidence against a null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\). Imagine running an experiment or collecting data to test a theory. The P-value helps you understand how likely it is to observe your results, provided that \(H_0\) is true.

To put it simply, a small P-value indicates that the evidence against \(H_0\) is strong. Here's how the P-value works:
  • If the P-value is very low, it suggests that the observed data is unlikely. This may lead you to reject \(H_0\).
  • If the P-value is high, it indicates that the data is consistent with \(H_0\), and you may not reject it.
It's crucial to remember that the P-value is a probability, ranging between 0 and 1. A P-value close to 0 means very strong evidence against \(H_0\), while a P-value close to 1 means weak evidence against \(H_0\). By comparing the P-value with the chosen significance level (\(\alpha\)), you decide whether or not to reject \(H_0\).
Significance Level
The "Significance Level" is the threshold used to decide whether the result of a statistical test should lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis \(H_0\). Commonly represented by \(\alpha\), the significance level is set by the researcher before conducting the test.

Different significance levels are typically used depending on the context, with 5% (\(\alpha = 0.05\)) and 1% (\(\alpha = 0.01\)) being the most popular. Here's how these levels work:
  • At \(\alpha = 0.05\), you might reject \(H_0\) if the P-value is less than 0.05. This means there is less than a 5% chance that the observed data would occur if \(H_0\) were true.
  • At \(\alpha = 0.01\), \(H_0\) can only be rejected if the P-value falls below 0.01, indicating greater confidence in the decision.
Choosing the right significance level depends on the field of study and the potential consequences of making a wrong decision. A lower \(\alpha\) reduces the risk of falsely rejecting \(H_0\) (Type I error), but may increase the risk of missing a true effect (Type II error). Thus, setting \(\alpha\) involves balancing these risks based on your specific needs.
Null Hypothesis
The "Null Hypothesis", often denoted as \(H_0\), serves as an initial assumption or claim to be tested. It's a statement of no effect or no difference, representing the default or status quo. For instance, in a study testing a new medication, \(H_0\) might state that the medication has no effect compared to a placebo.

During hypothesis testing, \(H_0\) is challenged with data in an attempt to assess its validity. The goal is to determine whether there's enough evidence to reject \(H_0\) in favor of an alternative hypothesis, \(H_1\). Some important points to remember about the null hypothesis include:
  • \(H_0\) is typically assumed true until evidence suggests otherwise.
  • Rejection of \(H_0\) implies support for \(H_1\), though it doesn't prove \(H_1\) is true beyond doubt.
  • Failing to reject \(H_0\) doesn't prove it true; it merely indicates insufficient evidence against it.
Understanding the null hypothesis is critical, as it forms the basis for performing statistical tests and making decisions based on data. In any analysis, clearly defining \(H_0\) and \(H_1\) is essential to provide a clear framework for testing and interpretation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of 46 adult coyotes in a region of northern Minnesota showed the average age to be \(\bar{x}=2.05\) years, with sample standard deviation \(s=0.82\) years (based on information from the book Coyotes: Biology, Behavior and Management by M. Bekoff, Academic Press). However, it is thought that the overall population mean age of coyotes is \(\mu=1.75 .\) Do the sample data indicate that coyotes in this region of northern Minnesota tend to live longer than the average of \(1.75\) years? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Are most student government leaders extroverts? According to Myers-Briggs estimates, about \(82 \%\) of college student government leaders are extroverts (Source: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Atlas of Type Tables). Suppose that a Myers-Briggs personality preference test was given to a random sample of 73 student government leaders attending a large national leadership conference and that 56 were found to be extroverts. Does this indicate that the population proportion of extroverts among college student government leaders is different (either way) from \(82 \% ?\) Use \(\alpha=0.01\)

When testing the difference of means for paired data, what is the null hypothesis?

Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted? A random sample of \(n_{1}=250\) people in Chicago ages \(18-25\) showed that \(r_{1}=45\) said yes. Another random sample of \(n_{2}=280\) people in Chicago ages \(35-45\) showed that \(r_{2}=71\) said yes (based on information from the National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago). Does this indicate that the population proportion of trusting people in Chicago is higher for the older group? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

Please read the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter. Recall that Benford's Law claims that numbers chosen from very large data files tend to have " \(1 "\) as the first nonzero digit disproportionately often. In fact, research has shown that if you randomly draw a number from a very large data file, the probability of getting a number with " 1 " as the leading digit is about \(0.301\) (see the reference in this chapter's Focus Problem). Now suppose you are an auditor for a very large corporation. The revenue report involves millions of numbers in a large computer file. Let us say you took a random sample of \(n=215\) numerical entries from the file and \(r=46\) of the entries had a first nonzero digit of \(1 .\) Let \(p\) represent the population proportion of all numbers in the corporate file that have a first nonzero digit of \(1 .\) j. Test the claim that \(p\) is less than \(0.301\). Use \(\alpha=0.01\). ii. If \(p\) is in fact less than \(0.301\), would it make you suspect that there are not enough numbers in the data file with leading 1 's? Could this indicate that the books have been "cooked" by "pumping up" or inflating the numbers? Comment from the viewpoint of a stockholder. Comment from the perspective of the Federal Bureau of Investigation as it looks for money laundering in the form of false profits. iii. Comment on the following statement: "If we reject the null hypothesis at level of significance \(\alpha\), we have not proved \(H_{0}\) to be false. We can say that the probability is \(\alpha\) that we made a mistake in rejecting \(H_{0} . "\) Based on the outcome of the test, would you recommend further investigation before accusing the company of fraud?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.