/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Please provide the following inf... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Please provide the following information. (a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses. Will you use a left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed test? (b) What sampling distribution will you use? Explain the rationale for your choice of sampling distribution. What is the value of the sample test statistic? (c) Find (or estimate) the \(P\) -value. Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the \(P\) -value. (d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level \(\alpha\) ? (e) State your conclusion in the context of the application. Let \(x\) be a random variable representing dividend yield of Australian bank stocks. We may assume that \(x\) has a normal distribution with \(\sigma=2.4 \%\). A random sample of 10 Australian bank stocks gave the following yields. \(\begin{array}{llllllllll}5.7 & 4.8 & 6.0 & 4.9 & 4.0 & 3.4 & 6.5 & 7.1 & 5.3 & 6.1\end{array}\) The sample mean is \(\bar{x}=5.38 \%\). For the entire Australian stock market, the mean dividend yield is \(\mu=4.7 \%\) (Reference: Forbes). Do these data indicate that the dividend yield of all Australian bank stocks is higher than \(4.7 \%\) ? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Fail to reject the null hypothesis; not enough evidence to suggest dividend yield > 4.7% at 0.01 significance.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Level of Significance and Formulate Hypotheses

The level of significance given in this problem is \( \alpha = 0.01 \). We need to test if the dividend yield of all Australian bank stocks is higher than 4.7%. Therefore, the null hypothesis \( H_0 \) will be that the mean dividend yield \( \mu \) equals 4.7%, i.e., \( H_0: \mu = 4.7 \). The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) will be that the mean dividend yield \( \mu \) is greater than 4.7%, i.e., \( H_a: \mu > 4.7 \). Since we are testing if the mean is greater than a certain value, this will be a right-tailed test.
02

Choose the Sampling Distribution and Calculate Test Statistic

Given that the population standard deviation \( \sigma \) is known and the sample size is less than 30, we will use the standard normal distribution (\( Z \)-distribution) for the test. The test statistic \( Z \) is calculated using the formula: \[Z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}\]Where \( \bar{x} = 5.38 \), \( \mu = 4.7 \), \( \sigma = 2.4 \), and \( n = 10 \). Substituting these values:\[Z = \frac{5.38 - 4.7}{\frac{2.4}{\sqrt{10}}} \approx 0.91\]
03

Determine the P-Value

The \( P \)-value is the probability that the observed result, or something more extreme, would occur if the null hypothesis were true. For a right-tailed test with \( Z = 0.91 \), we look up this value in a standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find \( P(Z > 0.91) \), which approximates to 0.1814.
04

Make a Decision Regarding the Null Hypothesis

To determine whether to reject the null hypothesis, we compare the \( P \)-value to \( \alpha \). Since \( P \)-value \( = 0.1814 \) is greater than \( \alpha = 0.01 \), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means there is not enough statistical evidence to support that the dividend yield of all Australian bank stocks is greater than 4.7% at the \( 0.01 \) significance level.
05

State the Conclusion

In conclusion, based on the sample data and the \( P \)-value obtained, we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that the average dividend yield of Australian bank stocks is greater than 4.7% at the 1% significance level. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Level of Significance
When conducting a hypothesis test, the level of significance, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a key component to understand. It represents the threshold or cut-off point for determining whether the observed data is statistically significant. In simpler terms, it is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis, known as a Type I error.
A common choice for \( \alpha \) is 0.05, but in the given problem, it is specified as 0.01. This means the risk of mistakenly concluding that the average dividend yield of Australian bank stocks is above 4.7% is set at 1%. In practice, a lower \( \alpha \) such as 0.01 necessitates stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
Choosing the right level of significance is crucial and depends on the context of the study, balancing the costs of errors against the need for evidence.
Sampling Distribution
Sampling distribution is a fundamental concept in hypothesis testing. When you take a random sample from a population, the statistics (like the mean or standard deviation) you calculate from this sample form their own distribution, known as the sampling distribution.
In our example, even though the sample size is small (n = 10), the population standard deviation \( \sigma \) is known. Therefore, it is appropriate to use the standard normal distribution, or \( Z \)-distribution, to test our hypothesis. The key idea is that while individual samples may vary, they follow a predictable distribution pattern when considered collectively.
Using a Z-distribution is particularly valid here as it helps quantify how far the sample mean of 5.38% is from the hypothesized population mean of 4.7%, accounting for sample size and variability. This choice makes the interpretation of results straightforward and mathematically robust.
P-Value
The \( P \)-value is a crucial concept in determining the result of a hypothesis test. It represents the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed results, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In our problem, the right-tailed \( P \)-value was found to be approximately 0.1814.
Calculating the \( P \)-value helps provide an objective criterion to determine whether the observed sample provides enough evidence against the null hypothesis. If the \( P \)-value is less than the pre-set level of significance \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis.
Here, because the \( P \)-value of 0.1814 is greater than \( \alpha = 0.01 \), it indicates that the observed sample mean could reasonably occur under the null hypothesis, implying insufficient evidence to claim a difference in mean yield.
Null Hypothesis
Every hypothesis test starts with a null hypothesis, \( H_0 \), which represents a statement of no effect or no difference. It is what researchers typically try to disprove or discredit.
In the context of our problem, the null hypothesis is that the mean dividend yield \( \mu \) equals 4.7%, expressed mathematically as \( H_0: \mu = 4.7 \). This hypothesis posits that the observed yields of the sample do not significantly differ from the larger Australian stock market average.
Rejecting the null hypothesis would imply enough evidence to suggest that the true average differs from 4.7%, whereas failing to reject it, as we conclude in this case, suggests that there isn't enough statistical proof to claim a difference. Proper formulation and understanding of the null hypothesis are essential in the process of scientific inquiry and decision making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of 46 adult coyotes in a region of northern Minnesota showed the average age to be \(\bar{x}=2.05\) years, with sample standard deviation \(s=0.82\) years (based on information from the book Coyotes: Biology, Bebavior and Management by M. Bekoff, Academic Press). However, it is thought that the overall population mean age of coyotes is \(\mu=1.75 .\) Do the sample data indicate that coyotes in this region of northern Minnesota tend to live longer than the average of \(1.75\) years? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

To use the normal distribution to test a proportion \(p\), the conditions \(n p>5\) and \(n q>5\) must be satisfied. Does the value of \(p\) come from \(H_{0}\), or is it estimated by using \(\hat{p}\) from the sample?

Athabasca Fishing Lodge is located on Lake Athabasca in northern Canada. In one of its recent brochures, the lodge advertises that \(75 \%\) of its guests catch northern pike over 20 pounds. Suppose that last summer 64 out of a random sample of 83 guests did, in fact, catch northern pike weighing over 20 pounds. Does this indicate that the population proportion of guests who catch pike over 20 pounds is different from \(75 \%\) (either higher or lower)? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

USA Today reported that about \(47 \%\) of the general consumer population in the United States is loyal to the automobile manufacturer of their choice. Suppose Chevrolet did a study of a random sample of 1006 Chevrolet owners and found that 490 said they would buy another Chevrolet. Does this indicate that the population proportion of consumers loyal to Chevrolet is more than \(47 \%\) ? Use \(\alpha=0.01\).

Is the national crime rate really going down? Some sociologists say yes! They say that the reason for the decline in crime rates in the \(1980 \mathrm{~s}\) and \(1990 \mathrm{~s}\) is demographics. It seems that the population is aging, and older people commit fewer crimes. According to the FBI and the Justice Department, \(70 \%\) of all arrests are of males aged 15 to 34 years. (Source: True Odds, by J. Walsh, Merritt Publishing.) Suppose you are a sociologist in Rock Springs, Wyoming, and a random sample of police files showed that of 32 arrests last month, 24 were of males aged 15 to 34 years. Use a \(1 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the population proportion of such arrests in Rock Springs is different from \(70 \%\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.