Please read the Focus Problem at the beginning of this chapter. Recall that
Benford's Law claims that numbers chosen from very large data files tend to
have "1" as the first nonzero digit disproportionately often. In fact,
research has shown that if you randomly draw a number from a very large data
file, the probability of getting a number with " 1 " as the leading digit is
about \(0.301\) (see the reference in this chapter's Focus Problem).
Now suppose you are an auditor for a very large corporation. The revenue
report involves millions of numbers in a large computer file. Let us say you
took a random sample of \(n=215\) numerical entries from the file and \(r=46\) of
the entries had a first nonzero digit of 1 . Let \(p\) represent the population
proportion of all numbers in the corporate file that have a first nonzero
digit of \(1 .\)
i. Test the claim that \(p\) is less than \(0.301\). Use \(\alpha=0.01\).
ii. If \(p\) is in fact less than \(0.301\), would it make you suspect that there
are not enough numbers in the data file with leading 1's? Could this indicate
that the books have been "cooked" by "pumping up" or inflating the numbers?
Comment from the viewpoint of a stockholder. Comment from the perspective of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation as it looks for money laundering in the
form of false profits.
iii. Comment on the following statement: If we reject the null hypothesis at
level of significance \(\alpha\), we have not proved \(H_{0}\) to be false. We can
say that the probability is \(\alpha\) that we made a mistake in rejecting
\(H_{0} .\) Based on the outcome of the test, would you recommend further
investigation before accusing the company of fraud?