/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 The following problem is based o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following problem is based on information from Archaeological Surveys of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, by A. Hayes, D. Brugge, and W. Judge, University of New Mexico Press. A transect is an archaeological study area that is \(1 / 5\) mile wide and 1 mile long. A site in a transect is the location of a significant archaeological find. Let \(x\) represent the number of sites per transect. In a section of Chaco Canyon, a large number of transects showed that \(x\) has a population variance \(\sigma^{2}=42.3 .\) In a different section of Chaco Canyon, a random sample of 23 transects gave a sample variance \(s^{2}=\) \(46.1\) for the number of sites per transect. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance to test the claim that the variance in the new section is greater than \(42.3 .\) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No evidence supports the claim of variance > 42.3; confidence interval is (26.67, 92.46).

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

Begin by stating the null and alternative hypotheses for the test. The null hypothesis is \( H_0: \sigma^2 = 42.3 \), which means the population variance in the new section is 42.3. The alternative hypothesis is \( H_a: \sigma^2 > 42.3 \), which claims that the population variance is greater than 42.3.
02

Determine the Test Statistic

The test statistic for variance is \( \chi^2 = \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\sigma^2} \), where \( n \) is the sample size. Here, \( n = 23 \), \( s^2 = 46.1 \), and assumed \( \sigma^2 = 42.3 \). Compute \( \chi^2 = \frac{(23-1) \times 46.1}{42.3} = \frac{1014.2}{42.3} \approx 23.98 \).
03

Find the Critical Value

At a \(5\%\) significance level for a right-tailed test with \( n-1 = 22 \) degrees of freedom, use the chi-square distribution table to find the critical value: \( \chi^2_{0.05, 22} \approx 33.924 \).
04

Make a Decision

Compare the test statistic \( 23.98 \) with the critical value \( 33.924 \). Since \( 23.98 < 33.924 \), we do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to claim that the variance is greater than 42.3.
05

Compute Confidence Interval for Variance

The \(95\%\) confidence interval for variance is given by: \[ \left( \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{upper}}, \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{lower}} \right) \] where \( \chi^2_{lower} \) and \( \chi^2_{upper} \) are the chi-square critical values at \(2.5\%\) and \(97.5\%\) levels, respectively, for \( 22 \) degrees of freedom. From the table, \( \chi^2_{0.025, 22} \approx 38.076 \) and \( \chi^2_{0.975, 22} \approx 10.982 \). Thus, the interval is: \[ \left( \frac{22 \times 46.1}{38.076}, \frac{22 \times 46.1}{10.982} \right) \approx \left( 26.67, 92.46 \right) \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Test
The Chi-Square Test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant difference between an observed distribution and a theoretical distribution. In this context, we use it to test the claim about population variance. This test is particularly useful when you want to test the variability of a sample against a known variance of the population.

To perform a Chi-Square Test, you first state the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis suggests there is no significant difference, while the alternative suggests there is. In this exercise, the null hypothesis is that the population variance is 42.3, and the alternative hypothesis claims it is greater than 42.3.

The test statistic is calculated using the formula:
  • \( \chi^2 = \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\sigma^2} \)
where \(n\) is the sample size, \(s^2\) is the sample variance, and \(\sigma^2\) is the known variance of the population.

It's crucial to compare this test statistic against a critical value from the Chi-Square distribution table to make a decision on whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Population Variance
Population Variance is an important statistical measure that indicates how much variability is present within a set of data points. It tells us the spread of the data around the mean in a population. The larger the variance, the more spread out the data points are.

In this exercise, the population variance \( \sigma^2 \) is initially given as 42.3. This represents how the number of archaeological sites per transect varied in the original section of Chaco Canyon.

It's important to distinguish between population variance and sample variance. Population variance uses the entire population data, whereas sample variance is calculated from a sample and requires a divisor of \( n-1 \) instead of \( n \) to account for estimation errors.

Understanding population variance is crucial when comparing sample data to a known population level, like checking if the variance in a new area differs from a known standard.
Confidence Interval
A Confidence Interval provides a range of values that is believed to contain the true population parameter. It gives you an indication of how reliable an estimate is. Here, a 95% confidence interval for the population variance is calculated.

To find this range, you use the Chi-Square distribution critical values. On one side, the confidence interval helps assess the variability within our population variance in a new section. The formula for calculating the confidence interval for variance is:
  • \[ \left( \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{upper}}, \frac{(n-1)s^2}{\chi^2_{lower}} \right) \]
Where \( \chi^2_{upper} \) and \( \chi^2_{lower} \) are the Chi-Square critical values at specified lower and upper probabilities for \( n-1\) degrees of freedom.

This interval allows you to capture the potential range of the true variance with a certain level of confidence, thereby providing insight into whether the observation is statistically significant.
Significance Level
The Significance Level, often denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold that determines when you should reject the null hypothesis. It quantifies the level of risk you are willing to take for making a Type I error, which occurs when you incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis.

In this problem, the significance level is set at 5%, or \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This means there is a 5% risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

The selection of the significance level affects the confidence of the results. A lower \( \alpha \) results in stricter criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis, while a higher \( \alpha \) makes it easier.

In statistical tests, if the test statistic exceeds the critical value associated with the chosen significance level, the null hypothesis is rejected. Alternatively, if it does not exceed, as in this exercise, it suggests insufficient evidence to reject, exemplifying the balance between confidence and risk in statistical analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Where are the deer? Random samples of square-kilometer plots were taken in different ecological locations of Mesa Verde National Park. The deer counts per square kilometer were recorded and are shown in the following table. (Source: The Mule Deer of Mesa Verde National Park, edited by G. W. Mierau and J. L. Schmidt, Mesa Verde Museum Association.) \(\begin{array}{ccc}\text { Mountain Brush } & \text { Sagebrush Grassland } & \text { Pinon Juniper } \\\ 30 & 20 & 5 \\ 29 & 58 & 7 \\ 20 & 18 & 4 \\ 29 & 22 & 9\end{array}\) Shall we reject or accept the claim that there is no difference in the mean number of deer per square kilometer in these different ecological locations? Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

A new fuel injection system has been engineered for pickup trucks. The new system and the old system both produce about the same average miles per gallon. However, engineers question which system (old or new) will give better consistency in fuel consumption (miles per gallon) under a variety of driving conditions. A random sample of 31 trucks were fitted with the new fuel injection system and driven under different conditions. For these trucks, the sample variance of gasoline consumption was 58.4. Another random sample of 25 trucks were fitted with the old fuel injection system and driven under a variety of different conditions. For these trucks, the sample variance of gasoline consumption was \(31.6 .\) Test the claim that there is a difference in population variance of gasoline consumption for the two injection systems. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question regarding the consistency of fuel consumption for the two fuel injection systems?

In general, how do the hypotheses for chi-square tests of independence differ from those for chi-square tests of homogeneity? Explain.

A factor in determining the usefulness of an examination as a measure of demonstrated ability is the amount of spread that occurs in the grades. If the spread or variation of examination scores is very small, it usually means that the examination was either too hard or too easy. However, if the variance of scores is moderately large, then there is a definite difference in scores between "better," "average," and "poorer" students. A group of attorneys in a Midwest state has been given the task of making up this year's bar examination for the state. The examination has 500 total possible points, and from the history of past examinations, it is known that a standard deviation of around 60 points is desirable. Of course, too large or too small a standard deviation is not good. The attorneys want to test their examination to see how good it is. A preliminary version of the examination (with slight modifications to protect the integrity of the real examination) is given to a random sample of 24 newly graduated law students. Their scores give a sample standard deviation of 72 points. (i) Using a \(0.01\) level of significance, test the claim that the population standard deviation for the new examination is 60 against the claim that the population standard deviation is different from \(60 .\) (ii) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the population variance. (iii) Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the population standard deviation.

For a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, how are the degrees of freedom computed?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.