/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 72. Candy! In the study of the candy... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Candy! In the study of the candy machine from Exercise 66, the sample mean weight for the bags of candy was 19.28 ounces and the sample standard deviation was 0.81 ounce.

a. Calculate the standardized test statistic.

b. Find and interpret the P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a) t=0.855

Part b) 0.30<P<0.40orP=0.39532

There is a 39.532%possibility of getting a sample mean amount of candy of 19.28ounces in 75bags of candies when the population means the amount of candy is 19.2ounces.

Part c) There is not enough convincing proof that the mean amount of candy that the machine put in all bags filled that day differs from 19.2ounces.

Step by step solution

01

Part a) Step 1: Given information

H0:μ=19.2H0:μnotequalto19.2α=0.10n=75x¯=19.28s=0.81

02

Part a) Step 2: Explanation

We know,

t=x¯-μ0s/n

The test statistic is

t=x¯-μ0s/n=19.28-19.20.81/75=0.855

03

Part b) Step 1: Explanation

From part (a)

we have,

t=0.855

The P-value is the probability of getting the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.

df=n-1=75-1=74

. Note: it is required to double the boundaries of the value of the test statistic, the reason is the test is two-tailed (due to the ≠ in the alternative hypothesis H1).

df=74is not available in the table, there is a need to use the nearest smaller degrees of freedom df=60instead.

0.30=2(0.15)<P<2(0.20)=0.40

Command Ti83/84-calculator: 2*tcdf (0.855,1E99,74)which will return a P-value of 0.39532Note: it could replace 1 E99 by any other very large positive number. There is a 39.532%possibility of getting a sample mean amount of candy of 19.28ounces in 75 bags of candies, when the population mean amount of candy is 19.2ounces.

04

Part c) Step 1: Explanation

From part (b)

We have,

0.30=2(0.15)<P<2(0.20)=0.40

Command Ti83/84-calculator: 2*tcdf(0.855,1E99,74)) which will return a P-value of 0.39532Note: it could replace 1E99by any other very large positive number. If the P-value is lesser than the significance level α, then the null hypothesis is rejected.

P>0.05⇒Fail to rejectH0

There is no enough convincing proof that the mean amount of candy that the machine put in all bags filled that day differs from 19.2ounces.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Home computersRefer to Exercise 35.

a. Explain why the sample result gives some evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

b. Calculate the standardized test statistic and P-value.

c. What conclusion would you make?

A company that manufactures classroom chairs for high school students

claims that the mean breaking strength of the chairs is 300 pounds. One of the chairs collapsed beneath a 220-pound student last week. You suspect that the manufacturer is exaggerating the breaking strength of the chairs, so you would like to perform a test of H0:μ=300Ha:μ<300where μ is the true mean breaking strength of this company’s classroom chairs.

a. The power of the test to detect that μ=294 based on a random sample of 30

chairs and a significance level of α=0.05 is 0.71. Interpret this value.

b. Find the probability of a Type I error and the probability of a Type II error for the test in part (a).

c. Describe two ways to increase the power of the test in part (a).

Don’t argue Refer to Exercises 2 and 12.

a. What conclusion would you make at the α=0.01 level?

b. Would your conclusion from part (a) change if a 5% significance level was used

instead? Explain your reasoning.

Bullies in middle school A media report claims that more than 75%of

middle school students engage in bullying behavior. A University of Illinois study on aggressive behavior surveyed a random sample of 558middle school students. When asked to describe their behavior in the last 30days, 445students admitted that they had engaged in physical aggression, social ridicule, teasing, name-calling, and issuing threats —all of which would be classified as bullying. Do these data provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05significance level that the media report’s claim is correct?

Better parking A local high school makes a change that should improve student

satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, 37%of the school’s students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200from the more than 2500students at the school. In all, 83students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective.

a. Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible

consequence of each.

b. Is there convincing evidence that the principal’s claim is true?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.