/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.44 Light through water Some college... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Light through water Some college students collected data on the intensity of light at various depths in a lake. Here is a scatterplot of their data:

a. At the top right is a scatterplot of the natural logarithm of light intensity versus depth. Based on this graph, explain why it would be reasonable to use an exponential model to describe the relationship between light intensity and depth.

b. Here is the computer output from a linear regression analysis of the transformed data. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use.

c. Use your model to predict the light intensity at a depth of 12 meters.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). Scatter plot is not having strong curvature.

b). The equation of the least-squares regression line is lny^=6.78910-0.333021x.

c). The expected that the intensity is 16.3275 lumens at depth of 12 metre.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

Presented the lack of substantial curvature in the given scatter plot, a linear model between the two scatter plot variables would be appropriate. As a result, a linear relationship between In(intensity) and depth is reasonable.

Expectations based on a general linear model Time and ln(intensity);

ln(intensity)=a+b(depth)

Taking the exponential

intensity=eln(intensity)

=ea+b(depth)=eaeb(depth)
03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

Least square regression line's general equation

y^=b0+b1x

In the row "constant" and the column "Coef" of the computer output, the calculated constant b0is mentioned.

b0=6.78910

In the row "Depth" and the column "Coef" of the computer output, the calculated slope b1 is mentioned.

b1=-0.333021

05

Part (b) Step 3: Explanation

Substituting the value of b0and b1

y^=b0+b1x

y^=6.78910-0.333021x

Wherex represents the current time and y is the ln (count)

role="math" localid="1654323193310" lny^=6.78910-0.333021x

Where x is representing the depth and y is representing the intensity.

06

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

Given data:

07

Part (c) Step 2: Explanation

Substituting the value of x

lny^=6.78910-0.333021x

lny^=6.78910-0.333021(12)

=2.792848

Taking the exponential

y^=elny^

=e2.792848

=16.3275

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Harris poll found that 54%of American adults don鈥檛 think that human beings developed from earlier species. The poll鈥檚 margin of error for 95%confidence was 3%. This means that

a. there is a 95%chance the interval (51%,57%) contains the true per cent of American adults who do not think that human beings developed from earlier species.

b. the poll used a method that provides an estimate within 3% of the truth about the population in 95%of samples.

c. if Harris conducts another poll using the same method, the results of the second poll will lie between 51%and 57%

d. there is a 3% chance that the interval is incorrect.

e. the poll used a method that would result in an interval that contains 54%in95% of all possible samples of the same size from this population.

Exercises T12.4鈥揟12.8 refer to the following setting. An old saying in golf is 鈥淵ou drive for show and you putt for dough.鈥 The point is that good putting is more important than long driving for shooting low scores and hence winning money. To see if this is the case, data from a random sample of 69 of the nearly 1000 players on the PGA Tour鈥檚 world money list are examined. The average number of putts per hole (fewer is better) and the player鈥檚 total winnings for the previous season are recorded and a least-squares regression line was fitted to the data. Assume the conditions for
inference about the slope are met. Here is computer output from the regression analysis:

T12.6 The P -value for the test in Exercise T12.5 is 0.0087. Which of the following is a correct interpretation of this result?
a. The probability there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for these 69 players is 0.0087.
b. The probability there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for all players on the PGA Tour鈥檚 world money list is 0.0087.
c. If there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players in the sample, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of 鈭4,139,198 or less is 0.0087.
d. If there is no linear relationship between average number of putts per hole and total winnings for the players on the PGA Tour鈥檚 world money list, the probability of getting a random sample of 69 players that yields a least-squares regression line with a slope of 鈭4,139,198 or less is 0.0087.
e. The probability of making a Type I error is 0.0087.

The swinging pendulum Refer to Exercise 33. Here is a graph of the period versus length, along with output from a linear regression analysis using these variables.

a. Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Define any variables you use. b. Use the model from part (a) to predict the period of a pendulum with length 80centimeters.

Women who are severely overweight suffer economic consequences, a study has shown. They have household incomes that are $6710less than other women, on average. The findings are from an eight-year observational study of 10,039randomly selected women who were 16-24years old when the research began. If the difference in average incomes is statistically significant, does this study give convincing evidence that being severely overweight causes a woman to have a lower income?

a. Yes; the study included both women who were severely overweight and women who were not.

b. Yes; the subjects in the study were selected at random.

c. Yes, because the difference in average incomes is larger than would be expected by chance alone.

d. No; the study showed that there is no connection between income and being severely overweight.

e. No; the study suggests an association between income and being severely overweight, but we can鈥檛 draw a cause-and-effect conclusion.

An experimenter wishes to test if one of two types of fish food (a standard fish food and a new product) is better for producing fish of equal weight after a two-month feeding program. The experimenter has two identical fish tanks (1 and 2) and is considering how to assign 40 fish, each of which has a numbered tag, to the tanks. The best way to do this would be to

a. put all the odd-numbered fish in Tank 1 and the even-numbered fish in Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

b. obtain pairs of fish whose weights are roughly equal at the start of the experiment and randomly assign one of the pair to Tank 1 and the other to Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

c. proceed as in option (b), but put the heavier of each pair into Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

d. assign the fish completely at random to the two tanks using a coin flip: heads means Tank 1 and tails means Tank 2. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

e. divide the 40 fish into two groups, with the 20 heaviest fish in one group. Randomly choose which tank to assign the heaviest fish and assign the lightest fish to the other tank. Give the standard food to Tank 1 and the new product to Tank 2.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.