/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. R 11.1 Testing a genetic model Biologis... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing a genetic model Biologists wish to cross pairs of tobacco plants having genetic makeup Gg, indicating that each plant has one dominant gene (G) and one recessive gene (g) for color. Each offspring plant will receive one gene for color from each parent. The Punnett square shows the possible combinations of genes received by the offspring.

The Punnett square suggests that the expected ratio of green (GG) to yellow-green (Gg) to albino (gg) tobacco plants should be 1:2:1. In other words, the biologists predict that 25%of the offspring will be green, 50%will be yellow-green, and 25%will be albino. To test their hypothesis about the distribution of offspring, the biologists mate 84randomly selected pairs of yellow-green parent plants. Of 84offspring, 23plants were green, 50were yellow-green, and 11 were albino. Do the data provide convincing evidence at the =0.01 level that the true distribution of offspring is different from what the biologists predict?

Short Answer

Expert verified

No, There is no convincing evidence for the true distribution of offspring.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We need to find out whether the data provided is convincing evidence or not.

02

Explanation

We know that

The null hypothesis asserts that the variables are unrelated, whereas the alternative hypothesis asserts that they are.

H0:p1=25%=0.25,p2=50%=0.50,p3=25%=0.25

H:Atleast one pi is different.

And expected frequencies are a product of row and column total divided by table total.

And The squared differences between the actual and predicted frequencies, divided by the expected frequency, make up the chi-square subtotals.

Therefore, the data is not convincing evidence that true distribution is different from prediction of biologist.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following is the correct number of degrees of freedom for the chi-square test using these data?

a.4

b.8

c. 10

d.20

e.4876

鈥淲ill changing the rating scale on a survey affect how people answer the question?鈥 To find out, the group took an SRS of 50students from an alphabetical roster of the school鈥檚 just over 1000students. The first 22students chosen were asked to rate the cafeteria food on a scale of 1(terrible) to 5(excellent). The remaining 28students were asked to rate the cafeteria food on a scale of 0(terrible) to 4(excellent). Here are the data:

a. Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

b. Explain why it would not be appropriate to perform a chi-square test in this setting.

Fruit flies Biologists wish to mate pairs of fruit flies having genetic makeup RrCc, indicating that each has one dominant gene (R) and one recessive gene (r) for eye color, along with one dominant (C) and one recessive (c) gene for wing type. Each offspring will receive one gene for each of the two traits from each parent, so the biologists predict that the following phenotypes should occur in a ratio of 9:3:3:1:

Assume that the conditions for inference are met. Carry out a test at the =0.05 significance level of the proposed genetic model.

Munching Froot Loops Kellogg鈥檚 Froot Loops cereal comes in six colors:

orange, yellow, purple, red, blue, and green. Charise randomly selected 120 loops and noted the color of each. Here are her data:

Do these data provide convincing evidence at the 5% significance level that Kellogg鈥檚 Froot Loops do not contain an equal proportion of each color?

In the United States, there is a strong relationship between education and smoking: well-educated people are less likely to smoke. Does a similar relationship hold in France? To find out, researchers recorded the level of education and smoking status of a random sample of 459French men aged 20to60years. The two-way table displays the data.

Is there convincing evidence of an association between smoking status and educational level among French men aged20to60years?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.