/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 65 In a pilot study, a company鈥檚 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In a pilot study, a company鈥檚 new cholesterol-reducing drug outperforms the currently available drug. If the data provide convincing evidence that the mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than 10milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dl) greater than with the current drug, the company will begin the expensive process of mass-producing the new drug. For the 14subjects who were assigned at random to the current drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 54.1mg/dl with a standard deviation of 11.93mg/dl. For the 15subjects who were randomly assigned to the new drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 68.7mg/dl with a standard deviation of 13.3mg/dl. Graphs of the data reveal no outliers or strong skewness.

a. Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is not H0:1-2=0.)

b. Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a. There is no convincing evidence that the true mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than ten milligrams per deciliter of blood greater than the mean cholesterol reduction with the current drug.

Part b. Type II error.

Step by step solution

01

Part a. Step 1. Given information

x1=54.1x2=68.7n1=14n2=15s1=11.93s2=13.3=0.05

02

Part a. Step 2. Explanation

The appropriate hypotheses for this is:

H0:1-2=-10Ha:1-2<-10

Now, find the test statistics:

t=(x1-x2)-(1-2)s12n1+s22n2=54.1-68.7-(-10)11.93214+13.3215=-0.982

Now, the degree of freedom will be:

df=min(n1-1,n2-1)=min(14-1,15-1)=13

So the P-value will be:

0.15<P<0.20

And we know that if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level then the null hypothesis is rejected, then,

P>0.5FailtoRejectH0

Thus, we conclude that there is no convincing evidence that the true mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than ten milligrams per deciliter of blood greater than the mean cholesterol reduction with the current drug.

03

Part b. Step 1. Explanation

We conclude in part (b) that,

There is no convincing evidence that the true mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than ten milligrams per deciliter of blood greater than the mean cholesterol reduction with the current drug.

A type I error occurs if we reject a null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is true. And the Type II error occurs if we fails to reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is false.

Thus, in this case we fail to reject the null hypothesis then it is a Type II error.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Bag lunch? Phoebe has a hunch that older students at her very large high

school are more likely to bring a bag lunch than younger students because they have grown tired of cafeteria food. She takes a simple random sample of 80 sophomores and finds that 52of them bring a bag lunch. A simple random sample of 104seniors reveals that 78of them bring a bag lunch.

a. Do these data give convincing evidence to support Phoebe鈥檚 hunch at the =0.05significance level?

b. Interpret the P-value from part (a) in the context of this study.

Men versus women The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Young Adult Literacy Assessment Survey interviewed separate random samples of840

men and 1077women aged 21to 25years.

The mean and standard deviation of scores on the NAEP鈥檚 test of quantitative skills were x1=272.40and s1=59.2for the men in the sample. For the women, the results were x 虅2=274.73and s2=57.5.

a. Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean score for

male and female young adults.

b. Based only on the interval from part (a), is there convincing evidence of a difference

in mean score for male and female young adults?

Response bias Does the appearance of the interviewer influence how people respond to a survey question? Ken (white, with blond hair) and Hassan (darker, with Middle Eastern features) conducted an experiment to address this question. They took turns (in a random order) walking up to people on the main street of a small town, identifying themselves as students from a local high school, and asking them, 鈥淒o you support President Obama鈥檚 decision to launch airstrikes in Iraq?鈥 Of the 50people Hassan spoke to, 11said 鈥淵es,鈥 while 21of the 44people Ken spoke to said 鈥淵es.鈥 Construct and interpret a 90%confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of people like these who would say they support President Obama鈥檚 decision when asked by Hassan versus when asked by Ken.

Facebook As part of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, researchers conducted two surveys. The first survey asked a random sample of 1060U.S. teens about their use of social media. A second survey posed similar questions to a random sample of 2003U.S. adults. In these two studies, 71.0%of teens and 58.0%of adults used Facebook. Let plocalid="1654194806576" T3051526=0.200=20.0%pT= the true proportion of all U.S. teens who use Facebook and pA3051526=0.200=20%pA = the true proportion of all U.S. adults who use Facebook. Calculate and interpret a 99%confidence interval for the difference in the true proportions of U.S. teens and adults who use Facebook.

Paying for college College financial aid offices expect students to use summer earnings to help pay for college. But how large are these earnings? One large university studied this question by asking a random sample of 1296 students who had summer jobs how much they earned. The financial aid office separated the responses into two groups based on gender, so these can be viewed as independent samples. Here are the data in summary form:24

a. How can you tell from the summary statistics that the distribution of earnings in each group is strongly skewed to the right? The use of two-sample t procedures is still justified. Why?

b. Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the true mean summer earnings of male and female students at this university.

c. Interpret the 90% confidence level in the context of this study

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.