/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. R4.5 The National Halothane Study was... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The National Halothane Study was a major investigation of the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. Records of over 850,000operations performed in 34major hospitals showed the following death rates for four common anesthetics:

There seems to be a clear association between the anesthetic used and the death rate of patients. Anesthetic C appears to be more dangerous.

a. Explain why we call the National Halothane Study an observational study rather than an experiment, even though it compared the results of using different anesthetics in actual surgery.

b. Identify the explanatory and response variables in this study.

c. When the study looked at other variables that are related to a doctor鈥檚 choice of anesthetic, it found that Anesthetic C was not causing extra deaths. Explain the concept of confounding in this context and identify a variable that might be confounded with the doctor鈥檚 choice of anesthetic.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Since records are used, no treatment was deliberately imposed on individuals and thus the study is an observational study.

b. The experimental variable is the anaesthetics and the response variable is the effect of the anaesthetic that is the death rate.

c. The type of the surgery is the variable.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1. Explanation

The National Halothane study an observational study rather than an experiment even though it compared the results of using different anaesthetics in actual surgery because An experiment deliberately imposes some treatment on individuals in order to observe their responses. An observational study tries to gather information without disturbing the scene they are observing.

Since records are used, no treatment was deliberately imposed on individuals and thus the study is an observational study.

02

Part (b) Step 1. Explanation

The explanatory variable is the one that is changed in order to see the effect on the response variable.

The experimental variable is the anaesthetics used in the surgery because it is used in the experiment and its result is the response variable is the effect of the anaesthetic that is the death rate controlled by the anaesthetics.

03

Part (c) Step 1. Explanation

Variables are confounded when their effects on a response variable cannot be distinguished. One possible confounding variable is type of surgery. If one anaesthesia is used more often with a type of surgery that has a higher death rate anyway, we wouldn鈥檛 know if the death rate was higher because of the anaesthesia type or the surgery type.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A simple random sample of 1200 adult Americans is selected, and each person is asked

the following question: 鈥淚n light of the huge national deficit, should the government at this

time spend additional money to send humans to Mars?鈥 Only 39% of those responding

answered 鈥淵es.鈥 This survey

a. is reasonably accurate because it used a large simple random sample.

b. needs to be larger because only about 24 people were drawn from each state.

c. probably understates the percent of people who favor sending humans to Mars.

d. is very inaccurate but neither understates nor overstates the percent of people who favor

sending humans to Mars. Because simple random sampling was used, it is unbiased.

e. probably overstates the percent of people who favor sending humans to Mars.

Immigration reform A news organization wants to know what percent of U.S. residents support a 鈥減athway to citizenship鈥 for people who live in the United States illegally. The news organization randomly selects registered voters for the survey. Describe how under coverage might lead to bias in this study. Explain the likely direction of the bias.

Your statistics class has 30students. You want to ask an SRS of 5students from your class whether they use a mobile device for the online quizzes. You label the students 01,02,...,30. You enter the table of random digits at this line: 1445926056314248037165103622532249061181

Your SRS contains the students labeled

a. 14,45,92,60,56

b. 14,31,03,10,22

c. 14,03,10,22,22

d.14,03,10,22,06

e.14,03,10,22,11

Doctors and nurses Nurse-practitioners are nurses with advanced qualifications who often act much like primary-care physicians. Are they as effective as doctors at treating patients with chronic conditions? An experiment was conducted with 1316patients who had been diagnosed with asthma, diabetes, or high blood pressure. Within each condition, patients were randomly assigned to either a doctor or a nurse-practitioner. The response variables included measures of the patients' health and of their satisfaction with their medical care after 6months.50

a. Which are the blocks in this experiment: the different diagnoses (asthma, diabetes, or high blood pressure) or the type of care (nurse or doctor)? Why?

b. Explain why a randomized block design is preferable to a completely randomized design in this context.

c. Suppose the experiment used only diabetes patients, but there were still 1316subjects willing to participate. What advantage would this offer? What disadvantage?

Initial public offerings (1.3) The business magazine Forbes reports that 4567companies sold their first stock to the public between 1990and 2000. The mean change in the stock price of these companies since the first stock was issued was +111%. The median change was -31%. Explain how this difference could happen.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.