/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 47 Child care and aggression A stud... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Child care and aggression A study of child care enrolled 1364 infants and followed them through their sixth year in school. Later, the researchers published an article in which they stated that 鈥渢he more time children spent in child care from birth to age 4, the more adults tended to rate them, both at age 4and at kindergarten, as less likely to get along with others, as more assertive, as disobedient, and as aggressive.鈥

a. What are the explanatory and response variables?

b. Is this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

c. Does this study show that child care makes children more aggressive? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part(a) The explanatory variable is the amount of time children spend in child care as newborns, and the response variable is hostility at an older age.
Part(b)The research is based on observation.

Part(c) No, this study does not show that child care makes children more aggressive

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find explanatory and response variables for given study.

02

Part(a) Step 2 : Simplify

In this study, infants are followed through their sixth year of school to see if the amount of time they spend in child care has an impact on their personalities, such as if they are more assertive, disobedient, or aggressive.
As a result, we may argue that time spent in child care is an independent variable, whereas violence at an older age is a dependent variable because it is reliant on time spent.
As a result, the time spent in child care as a newborn is an explanatory variable, while violence at a later age is a response variable.

03

Part(b) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find is this an observational study or an experiment.

04

Part(b) Step 2 : Simplify

The children were observed throughout their sixth year of school in this study, but the researchers had no influence over the youngsters and hence no treatments were administered to them.
As a result, the researchers did not assign therapies to the children, making this an observational study.

05

Part(c) Step 1 : Given information

We need to find that does this study show that child care makes children more aggressive.

06

Part(c) Step 2 : Simplify

We learn that the study is an observational study in portion (b).
Because the outcome could be influenced by the hidden variables, it is impossible to say if child care is the source of the infants' aggressiveness.
The temperament of the parents could be a hidden variable, as children tend to have the same temperament as their parents, and the temperament of the parents could impact their decision to leave the child in child care.
It is preferable to conduct an experiment rather than an observational research since there is less likelihood of the lurking variable influencing the outcome.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study of treatments for angina (pain due to low blood supply to the heart) compared

bypass surgery, angioplasty, and use of drugs. The study looked at the medical records

of thousands of angina patients whose doctors had chosen one of these treatments. It

found that the average survival time of patients given drugs was the highest. What do

you conclude?

a. This study proves that drugs prolong life and should be the treatment of choice.

b. We can conclude that drugs prolong life because the study was a comparative

experiment.

c. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the patients were volunteers.

d. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the groups might differ in ways

besides the treatment.

e. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because no placebo was used.

Cocoa and blood flow- A study of blood flow involved27healthy people aged18to72.

Each subject consumed a cocoa beverage containing900milligrams of flavanols daily for

5days. Using a finger cuff, blood flow was measured on the first and fifth days of the

study. After5days, researchers measured what they called 鈥渟ignificant improvement鈥 in

Blood flow and the function of the cells that line the blood vessels. What a flaw in the

design of this experiment makes it impossible to say if the cocoa really caused the

improved blood flow? Explain your answer.

Funding for fine arts The band director at a high school wants to estimate the percentage

of parents who support a decrease in the budget for fine arts. Because many parents attend

the school鈥檚 annual musical, the director surveys the first 30parents who arrive at the

show. Explain how bias in the sampling method could affect the estimate.

Cocoa and blood flow A study of blood flow involved 27healthy people aged 18to 72. Each subject consumed a cocoa beverage containing 900milligrams of flavonols daily for 5days. Using a finger cuff, blood flow was measured on the first and fifth days of the study. After 5 days, researchers measured what they called 鈥渟ignificant improvement鈥 in blood flow and the function of the cells that line the blood vessels. What flaw in the design of this experiment makes it impossible to say if the cocoa really caused the improved blood flow? Explain your answer.

To investigate if standing up while studying affects performance in an algebra class, a teacher assigns half of the 30students in his class to stand up while studying and assigns the other half to not stand up while studying. To determine who receives which treatment, the teacher identifies the two students who did best on the last exam and randomly assigns one to stand and one to not stand. The teacher does the same for the next two highest-scoring students and continues in this manner until each student is assigned a treatment.

Which of the following best describes this plan?

a. This is an observational study.

b. This is an experiment with blocking.

c. This is a completely randomized experiment.

d. This is a stratified random sample.

e. This is a cluster sample.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.