/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 45 Snacking and TV Does the type of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Q. 45 (page 262)

Snacking and TV Does the type of program people watch influence how much they eat? A total of 94college students were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: watching 20minutes of a Hollywood action movie (The Island), watching the same 20-minute excerpt of the movie with no sound, and watching 20minutes of an interview program (Charlie Rose). While watching, participants were given snacks (M&M鈥橲庐, cookies, carrots, and grapes) and allowed to eat as much as they wanted. Subjects who watched the highly stimulating excerpt from The Island ate 65%more calories than subjects who watched Charlie Rose. Participants who watched the silent version of The Island ate 46% more calories than those who watched Charlie Rose. Identify the explanatory and response variables in this study. Then determine if it is an experiment or an observational study. Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The research is observational. As a result, the response variable is the amount of food people eat, whereas the explanatory variable is the style of programming.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

We need to find if the given study is observational.

02

Simplify

The researchers concluded that the type of programme watch has an impact on how much they eat or don't eat in the particular study.
As a result, the particular program is the independent variable in this situation, whereas the quantity of food consumed is the dependent variable because it is reliant on the type of show individuals watch.
As a result, the response variable is the amount of food people eat, whereas the explanatory variable is the style of programming.
In addition, the researchers in the study are attempting to collect data without disturbing the scenario they are witnessing.
This is due to the fact that they do not tell individuals how much to eat or when to eat; instead, they simply observe it.
As a result, the research is observational.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sampling the forestTo gather data on a 1200-acre pine forest in Louisiana, the U.S. Forest Service laid a grid of 1410equally spaced circular plots over a map of the forest. A ground survey visited a sample of 10%of the plots.

a. Explain how you would use a random number generator to choose an SRS of 141plots. Your description should be clear enough for a classmate to carry out your plan.

b. Use your method from part (a) to choose the first 3plots.

SRS of students? At a party, there are 30 students over age 21 and 20students underage21. You choose at random 3 of those over 21 and separately choose at random 2 of those under 21 to interview about their attitudes toward alcohol. You have given every student at the party the same chance to be interviewed. Is your sample an SRS? Explain your answer.

A louse-y situation A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared two medicines to treat head lice: an oral medication called ivermectin and a topical lotion containing malathion. Researchers studied 812 people in 376 households in seven areas around the world. Of the 185 households randomly assigned to ivermectin, 171 were free from head lice after 2 weeks, compared with only 151 of the 191 households randomly assigned to malathion.

a. Calculate the difference (Ivermectin 鈥� Malathion) in the proportion of households that were free from head lice in the two groups.

One hundred trials of a simulation were performed to see what differences in proportions would occur due only to chance variation in the random assignment, assuming that the type of medication doesn鈥檛 matter. The results are shown in the dotplot.

b. There is one dot at 0.09. Explain what this dot means in this context.

c. Use the results of the simulation to determine if the difference in proportions from part (a) is statistically significant. Explain your reasoning.

A study of treatments for angina (pain due to low blood supply to the heart) compared

bypass surgery, angioplasty, and use of drugs. The study looked at the medical records

of thousands of angina patients whose doctors had chosen one of these treatments. It

found that the average survival time of patients given drugs was the highest. What do

you conclude?

a. This study proves that drugs prolong life and should be the treatment of choice.

b. We can conclude that drugs prolong life because the study was a comparative

experiment.

c. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the patients were volunteers.

d. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the groups might differ in ways

besides the treatment.

e. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because no placebo was used.

Consider an experiment to investigate the effectiveness of different insecticides in

controlling pests and their impact on the productivity of tomato plants. What is the best

reason for randomly assigning treatment levels (spraying or not spraying) to the

experimental units (farms)?

a. Random assignment eliminates the effects of other variables, like soil fertility.

b. Random assignment eliminates chance variation in the responses.

c. Random assignment allows researchers to generalize conclusions about the

effectiveness of the insecticides to all farms.

d. Random assignment will tend to average out all other uncontrolled factors such as

soil fertility so that they are not confounded with the treatment effects.

e. Random assignment helps avoid bias due to the placebo effect.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Calculus

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.