/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 102 Do diets work? Dr. Linda Stern a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Do diets work? Dr. Linda Stern and her colleagues recruited 132 obese adults at the

Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Pennsylvania. Half the participants

Page Number: 282

were randomly assigned to a low-carbohydrate diet and the other half to a low-fat diet.

Researchers measured each participant鈥檚 change in weight and cholesterol level after six

months and again after one year. Subjects in the low-carb diet group lost significantly

more weight than subjects in the low-fat diet group during the first six months. At the

end of a year, however, the average weight loss for subjects in the two groups was not

significantly different.

64

a. Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the diet treatments?

b. Explain to someone who knows little statistics what 鈥渓ost significantly more weight鈥

means.

c. The subjects in the low-carb diet group lost an average of 5.1 kg in a year. The

subjects in the low-fat diet group lost an average of 3.1 kg in a year. Explain how this

information could be consistent with the fact that weight loss in the two groups was

not significantly different.

Short Answer

Expert verified

For eliminating confounding

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

researchers randomly assign the subjects to the diet treatments.

02

Explanation:

When the effects of two variables on the same response variable cannot be distinguished, they are said to be confused.

03

Given Information:

鈥渓ost significantly more weight鈥

04

Explanation:

The low-carbohydrate diet and the low-fat diet were assigned to patients at random.

05

Given Information:

The subjects in the low-carb diet group lost an average of 5.1 kg in a year. The

subjects in the low-fat diet group lost an average of 3.1 kg in a year.

06

Explanation:

Patients are randomly assigned to therapies, ensuring that the different treatment groups are as identical as feasible prior to therapy, preventing confounding.

For example, if one of the groups had higher weights and cholesterol levels before the treatment, that group is more likely to have a larger change in weight and cholesterol levels after the treatment (as their weights and cholesterol levels can decrease more).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Kissing the right way According to a newspaper article, 鈥淢ost people are kissing the

鈥榬ight way.鈥欌 That is, according to a study, the majority of couples prefer to tilt their heads

to the right when kissing. In the study, a researcher observed a random sample of124

kissing couples and found that 8312466.9%of the couples tilted to the right. To

determine if these data provide convincing evidence that couples are more likely to tilt

their heads to the right, 100simulated SRSs were selected.

Each dot in the graph shows the number of couples that tilt to the right in a simulated SRS

of124couples, assuming that each couple has a 50%chance of tilting to the right.

a. Explain how the graph illustrates the concept of sampling variability.

b. Based on the data from the study and the results of the simulation, is there convincing

evidence that couples prefer to kiss the 鈥渞ight way鈥? Explain your answer.

Bias in a sampling method is

a. any difference between the sample result and the truth about the population.

b. the difference between the sample result and the truth about the population due to

using chance to select a sample.

c. any difference between the sample result and the truth about the population due to

practical difficulties such as contacting the subjects selected.

d. any difference between the sample result and the truth about the population that

tends to occur in the same direction whenever you use this sampling method.

e. racism or sexism on the part of those who take the sample.

A study of treatments for angina (pain due to low blood supply to the heart) compared

bypass surgery, angioplasty, and use of drugs. The study looked at the medical records

of thousands of angina patients whose doctors had chosen one of these treatments. It

found that the average survival time of patients given drugs was the highest. What do

you conclude?

a. This study proves that drugs prolong life and should be the treatment of choice.

b. We can conclude that drugs prolong life because the study was a comparative

experiment.

c. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the patients were volunteers.

d. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because the groups might differ in ways

besides the treatment.

e. We can鈥檛 conclude that drugs prolong life because no placebo was used.

Reducing unemployment Will cash bonuses speed the return to work of unemployed people? A state department of labor notes that last year 68%of people who filed claims for unemployment insurance found a new job within 15weeks. As an experiment, this year the state offers $500to people filing unemployment claims if they find a job within 15weeks. The percent who do so increases to 77%. What flaw in the design of this experiment makes it impossible to say if the bonus really caused the increase? Explain your answer.

Online reviews Many websites include customer reviews of products, restaurants, hotels,

and so on. The manager of a hotel was upset to see that 26%of reviewers on a travel

website gave the hotel 鈥1star鈥濃攖he lowest possible rating. Explain how bias in the

sampling method could affect the estimate.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.