/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 101 Vigorous exercise helps people l... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Vigorous exercise helps people live several years longer (on average). Whether mild activities like slow walking extend life is not clear. Suppose that the added life expectancy from regular slow walking is just 2 months. A statistical test is more likely to find a significant increase in mean life expectancy if (a) it is based on a very large random sample and a \(5 \%\) significance level is used. (b) it is based on a very large random sample and a \(1 \%\) significance level is used. (c) it is based on a very small random sample and a \(5 \%\) significance level is used. (d) it is based on a very small random sample and a \(1 \%\) significance level is used. (e) the size of the sample doesn't have any effect on the significance of the test.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Large sample and 5% significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Effect Size

Here, the added life expectancy from regular slow walking is just 2 months. This is a small effect size, which means detecting this small difference using statistical tests requires certain conditions.
02

Importance of Sample Size

Larger sample sizes tend to produce more precise estimates of a population parameter. Thus, a large sample size is better for detecting small differences, like a 2-month increase in life expectancy.
03

Understand Significance Levels

The significance level (e.g., 5% or 1%) influences the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true (Type I error). A 5% significance level means there's a 5% chance of a Type I error, and a 1% level is more stringent.
04

Evaluate Options Based on Sample Size and Significance Level

For small effect sizes, a larger sample and a less stringent significance level (such as 5%) will provide a test that is more likely to detect this effect, assuming it exists.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Size
The sample size in a statistical study refers to the number of observations or data points collected. This is a crucial factor because the larger your sample size, the closer your sample mean is likely to be to the true population mean. When you're trying to detect small differences, such as a 2-month increase in life expectancy from slow walking, having a large sample size is particularly important.
Here’s why:
  • Larger sample sizes reduce variability, increasing the precision of your estimates.
  • With more data, the distribution of sample means tightens up around the true population mean, making it easier to detect even small changes.
Think of it like tuning in a radio station; the more precise your tuning, the clearer the signal you receive. Similarly, a larger sample size "tunes" in the signal of small effects more clearly.
Effect Size
Effect size is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of the experimental effect. In our example, it's the 2-month increase in life expectancy due to slow walking. The size of this effect helps determine how easy or hard it will be to notice any differences in your data.
Here are some key points about effect size:
  • Small effect sizes require larger samples to be detected reliably, as there is less "contrast" against the natural variability.
  • Understanding effect size helps in designing more effective studies and choosing the appropriate statistical tests.
The smaller the effect size, the more difficult it is to distinguish from random noise in the data. This is why large samples are often necessary for detecting small effects in statistical testing.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by alpha (α), is the probability threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. Common levels include 5% (0.05) or 1% (0.01). It essentially tells us how willing we are to risk a Type I error, which is rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Here's how significance levels affect your test:
  • A 5% significance level means you accept a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when, in fact, it doesn't.
  • A 1% significance level lowers this risk, making your test more stringent, but potentially missing true effects if they are small.
In scenarios with small effect sizes, like our slow walking example, using a 5% significance level with a large sample increases the likelihood of detecting a real difference, albeit with a slightly higher risk of a Type I error.
Type I Error
A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is true, but we incorrectly reject it. It’s like a false alarm, where we think there's an effect, but there's none. The probability of making a Type I error is determined by the significance level you choose for your test. Understanding Type I error involves:
  • Accepting that with a 5% significance level, 1 out of every 20 tests might indicate an effect that isn't there.
  • Balancing the risks of Type I errors with the ability to detect actual effects, especially when dealing with small effect sizes.
Choosing the right balance of sample size, effect size, and significance level is crucial. This helps ensure that you're able to distinguish between true signals in the data and noise, avoiding unnecessary Type I errors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercises 21 and 22 refer to the following setting. Slow response times by paramedics, firefighters, and policemen can have serious consequences for accident victims. In the case of life-threatening injuries, victims generally need medical attention within 8 minutes of the accident. Several cities have begun to monitor emergency response times. In one such city, the mean response time to all accidents involving life-threatening injuries last year was \(\mu=6.7\) minutes. Emergency personnel arrived within 8 minutes on \(78 \%\) of all calls involving life-threatening injuries last year. The city manager shares this information and encourages these first responders to "do better." At the end of the year, the city manager selects an SRS of 400 calls involving life-threatening injuries and examines the response times. (a) State hypotheses for a significance test to determine whether the average response time has decreased. Be sure to define the parameter of interest. (b) Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and explain the consequences of each. (c) Which is more serious in this setting: a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

A local high school makes a change that should improve student satisfaction with the parking situation. Before the change, \(37 \%\) of the school's students approved of the parking that was provided. After the change, the principal surveys an SRS of 200 of the over 2500 students at the school. In all, 83 students say that they approve of the new parking arrangement. The principal cites this as evidence that the change was effective. Perform a test of the principal's claim at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level.

Does listening to music while studying hinder students' learning? Two AP Statistics students designed an experiment to find out. They selected a random sample of 30 students from their medium-sized high school to participate. Each subject was given 10 minutes to memorize two different lists of 20 words, once while listening to music and once in silence. The order of the two word lists was determined at random; so was the order of the treatments. The difference in the number of words recalled (music- silence) was recorded for each subject. A paired \(t\) test on the differences yielded \(t=-3.01\) and \(P\) -value \(=0.0027\) (a) State appropriate hypotheses for the paired \(t\) test. Be sure to define your parameter. (b) What are the degrees of freedom for the paired \(t\) test? (c) Interpret the \(P\) -value in context. What conclusion should the students draw? (d) Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting. Which mistake could students have made based on your answer to part (c)?

In early 2012 , the Pew Internet and American Life Project asked a random sample of U.S. adults, "Do you ever ... use Twitter or another service to share updates about yourself or to see updates about others?" According to Pew, the resulting \(95 \%\) confidence interval is \((0.123\), 0.177)\(.^{13}\) Does this interval provide convincing evidence that the actual proportion of U.S. adults who would say they use Twitter differs from \(0.16 ?\) Justify your answer.

Explaining confidence (8.2) Here is an explanation from a newspaper concerning one of its opinion polls. Explain what is wrong with the following statement. For \(a\) poll of 1,600 adults, the variation due to sampling error is no more than three percentage points either way. The error margin is said to be valid at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that, if the same questions were repeated in 20 polls, the results of at least 19 surveys would be within three percentage points of the results of this survey.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.