/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 63 Dr. Linda Stern and her colleagu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 63

Dr. Linda Stern and her colleagues recruited 132 obese adults at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Pennsylvania. Half the participants were randomly assigned to a lowcarbohydrate diet and the other half to a low-fat diet. Researchers measured each participant's change in weight and cholesterol level after six months and again after one year. Explain how each of the four principles of experimental design was used in this study.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The study uses random assignment, control, replication, and randomization.

Step by step solution

01

Random Assignment

In this study, the participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a low-carbohydrate diet group and a low-fat diet group. Random assignment helps to eliminate bias and ensures that both groups are statistically similar before any treatment is applied.
02

Control Group

Although the study uses two different diets, there is a form of control by comparing the effects between these two types of diets. Each diet group serves as a point of comparison for the other, allowing researchers to observe the effects of diet type on weight and cholesterol levels.
03

Replication

The study uses a sufficiently large sample size, with 132 participants being monitored for changes across a year. This sample size helps ensure that the results are not due to chance and can allow for generalization to a larger population.
04

Randomization

The random allocation of participants into the two different dietary groups further consists of randomization, which is essential for reducing bias and balancing confounding variables between the two groups for accurate results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
In a scientific study, random assignment plays a critical role in ensuring that participants have an equal chance of being assigned to any group. This is accomplished by randomly dividing participants into groups to eliminate selection bias.
In the study conducted by Dr. Linda Stern, 132 obese adults were randomly assigned to either a low-carbohydrate diet group or a low-fat diet group. This method helps distribute participant characteristics evenly across both groups, making it more likely that differences in outcomes are due to the intervention itself and not other factors. By using random assignment, researchers enhance the validity of the study results.
Control Group
A control group is vital in experiments for providing a baseline comparison. Although traditional studies often have a non-treatment group as the control, in this study each diet group acts as a control for the other.
When comparing two different interventions鈥攍ike the low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets鈥攖he results from one group can be benchmarked against the other. This setup allows for direct assessment of how each diet specifically impacts weight and cholesterol levels over time. By serving as controls for each other, researchers can isolate the effects of the dietary interventions.
Replication
Replication is essential in scientific research to ensure that findings are not flukes or anomalies. It refers to the process of repeating a study to verify its results.
In Dr. Stern's study, replication is evidenced by the large sample size of 132 adults. Such a number is significant as it enhances the reliability of the study by reducing the margin of error and increasing the confidence in the findings. When experiments include more participants, there's a greater likelihood that the results are true reflections of the population. Thus, replication through larger samples contributes significantly to the credibility and generality of the research outcomes.
Randomization
Randomization is a crucial aspect of experimental design, emphasizing the importance of randomly allocating participants to different groups. This approach aims to minimize biases and balance out confounding variables.
In the context of the study, randomization ensures that characteristics like age, gender, lifestyle, or health status are equally distributed among the low-carbohydrate and low-fat diet groups. This balanced distribution reduces the impact of these variables on the study's outcomes, ensuring the observed effects on weight and cholesterol are due, primarily, to the diet. By employing randomization, the study achieves more reliable and unbiased results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(A\) recent online poll posed the question "Should female athletes be paid the same as men for the work they do?" In all, 13,147 \((44 \%)\) said "Yes," \(15,182(50 \%)\) said "No," and the remaining 1448 said "Don't know." In spite of the large sample size for this survey, we can't trust the result. Why not?

A University of Helsinki (Finland) study wanted to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on infant temperament at age 6 months. Researchers began by asking 305 healthy pregnant women to report their chocolate consumption. Six months after birth, the researchers asked mothers to rate their infants' temperament, including smiling, laughter, and fear. The babies born to women who had been eating chocolate daily during pregnancy were found to be more active and "positively reactive"-a measure that the investigators said encompasses traits like smiling and laughter. \({ }^{32}\) (a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer. (b) What are the explanatory and response variables? (c) Does this study show that eating chocolate regularly during pregnancy helps produce infants with good temperament? Explain.

Which of the following statements are true of a table of random digits, and which are false? Bricfly explain your answers. (a) There are exactly four 0 s in each row of 40 digits. (b) each pair of digits has chance \(1 / 100\) of being 00 . (c) Ilie digits 0000 can never appear as a group, because this pattern is not random.

\(\Lambda\) researcher reported that the typical teenager needs 9.3 hours of sleep per night but gets only 6.3 hours. \({ }^{18} \mathrm{By}\) the end of a 5 -day school week, a teenager would accumulate about 15 hours of "sleep debt." Students in a high school statistics class were skeptical, so they gathered data on the amount of sleep debt (in hours) accumulated over time (in days) by a random sample of 25 high school students. The resulting least-squares regression equation for their data is Sleep debt \(=2.23+3.17\) (days). (a) Interpret the slope of the regression line in context. (b) Are the students' results consistent with the rescarcher's report? Explain.

An experiment that claimed to show that meditation lowers anxiety proceeded as follows. The experimenter interviewed the subjects and rated their level of anxiety. Then the subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimenter taught one group how to meditate and they meditated daily for a month. The other group was simply told to relax more. At the end of the month, the experimenter interviewed all the subjects again and rated their anxiety level. The meditation group now had less anxiety. Psychologists said that the results were suspect because the ratings were not blind. Explain what this means and how lack of blindness could bias the reported results.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.