/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 35 Sorry, no chi-square How do U.S.... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Sorry, no chi-square How do U.S. residents who travel overseas for leisure differ from those who travel for business? The following is the breakdown by occupation: \({ }^{17}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text { 0ccupation } & \text { Leisure } & \text { Business } \\ \text { Professional/technical } & \text { travelers (\%) } & \text { travelers (\%) } \\ \text { Manager/executive } & 36 & 39 \\ \text { Retired } & 23 & 48 \\ \text { Student } & 14 & 3 \\ \text { 0ther } & 7 & 3 \\ \text { Total } & 20 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Explain why we can't use a chi-square test to learn whether these two distributions differ significantly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Chi-square requires count data, not percentages.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Chi-Square Requirements

The chi-square test is a statistical method used to examine differences between categorical variables. To use a chi-square test, each category must have an expected count of at least 5 in each of the cells of the contingency table.
02

Identify the Contingency Table

In this problem, the contingency table shows the percentage of travelers by occupation and purpose (Leisure and Business). The table has four occupations and two categories of travel.
03

Check the Data Type

The chi-square test requires actual counts, not percentages. The data provided in the problem is expressed in percentages, not as raw counts of individuals.
04

Assess Table Requirements

To conduct a chi-square test, we need to know the total number of travelers in each category, which the problem does not provide. Without these actual counts (frequency data), we cannot proceed.
05

Conclusion

Since we have percentages instead of raw counts, and essential information about the total number of travelers is missing, it is not possible to use a chi-square test to compare the distributions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Contingency Table
A contingency table, also known as a cross-tabulation or crosstab, is an effective way to summarize data that shows the frequency distribution of variables. In the context of the problem, the contingency table helps visualize how U.S. residents who travel overseas either for leisure or business are distributed by occupation.

The table is structured with two dimensions: occupations and travel purposes. Each cell in the table represents the percentage of travelers belonging to a specific occupation within either the leisure or business category. While this representation provides a clear snapshot of percentages, using it for statistical testing like the chi-square test requires raw counts rather than percentages.

For a meaningful chi-square analysis, each entry must be an actual count of occurrences, not just proportions or percentages. This would allow evaluators to assess independence between variables effectively.
Categorical Variables
Categorical variables are types of variables that classify data into distinct categories or groups, without any intrinsic order. These variables often answer questions about how data is categorized or grouped within certain classifications.

In this exercise, the categorical variables are 'Occupation' which includes categories such as Professional/Technical, Manager/Executive, Retired, Student, and Other. The second categorical variable is 'Travel Purpose' including Leisure and Business.

Understanding the role of categorical variables is crucial when performing statistical analyses, as the methods used, like the chi-square test, depend heavily on categorical data to determine the relationship and independence between different categories.
Expected Counts
Expected counts refer to the estimated number of occurrences we would anticipate in each cell of a contingency table if there was no association between the variables. It's a crucial part of conducting a chi-square test as it helps compare the observed data to what we would expect under the assumption of independence.

For each cell in the table representing different categories of two variables, the expected count is calculated based on the total counts of data available. The formula for calculating expected counts is:
  • Expected Count = (Row Total * Column Total) / Grand Total
This calculation allows us to see if the observed count significantly deviates from what we expect, thereby indicating an association between variables.

In the context of this exercise, because the data is given in percentages, we cannot directly calculate expected counts. This absence of actual counts makes it impossible to proceed with a chi-square analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis encompasses methods used to examine the trends, patterns, and relationships within data. The chi-square test is a key statistical tool for analyzing categorical data, allowing researchers to test for independence between two categorical variables.

To properly conduct statistical analysis using a chi-square test, it's necessary to have a dataset structured with observed and expected counts of occurrences in a contingency table. This enables the calculation of a chi-square statistic, which is then compared to a chi-square distribution to determine significance.

In this particular exercise, due to the absence of actual counts and only having percentage data, we cannot conduct a valid chi-square test. While the data representation provides insights on travel purposes across different occupations, without the complete dataset, a formal test of significance using statistical analysis is not feasible.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How to quit smoking It's hard for smokers to quit. Perhaps prescribing a drug to fight depression will work as well as the usual nicotine patch. Perhaps combining the patch and the drug will work better than either treatment alone. Here are data from a randomized, double-blind trial that compared four treatments. \({ }^{19} \mathrm{~A}\) "success" means that the subject did not smoke for a year following the beginning of the study. $$ \begin{array}{llcc} \hline \text { Group } & \text { Treatment } & \text { Subjects } & \text { Successes } \\ 1 & \text { Nicotine patch } & 244 & 40 \\ 2 & \text { Drug } & 244 & 74 \\ 3 & \text { Patch plus drug } & 245 & 87 \\ 4 & \text { Placebo } & 160 & 25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Summarize these data in a two-way table. Then compare the success rates for the four treatments. (b) Explain in words what the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p_{1}=\) \(p_{2}=p_{3}=p_{4}\) says about subjects' smoking habits. (c) Do the data provide convincing evidence of a difference in the effectiveness of the four treatments at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level?

Aw, nuts! A company claims that each batch of its deluxe mixed nuts contains \(52 \%\) cashews, \(27 \%\) almonds, \(13 \%\) macadamia nuts, and \(8 \%\) brazil nuts. To test this claim, a quality-control inspector takes a random sample of 150 nuts from the latest batch. The one-way table below displays the sample data. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \text { Nut: } & \text { Cashew } & \text { Almond } & \text { Macadamia } & \text { Brazil } \\ \text { Count: } & 83 & 29 & 20 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) State appropriate hypotheses for performing a test of the company's claim. (b) Calculate the expected counts for each type of nut. Show your work.

Refer to the following setting. The manager of a high school cafeteria is planning to offer several new types of food for student lunches in the following school year. She wants to know if each type of food will be equally popular so she can start ordering supplies and making other plans. To find out, she selects a random sample of 100 students and asks them, "Which type of food do you prefer: Asian food, Mexican food, pizza, or hamburgers?" Here are her data: $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \text { Type of Food: } & \text { Asian } & \text { Mexican } & \text { Pizza } & \text { Hamburgers } \\ \text { Count: } & 18 & 22 & 39 & 21 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The \(P\) -value for a chi-square test for goodness of fit is \(0.0129 .\) Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion? (a) Because 0.0129 is less than \(\alpha=0.05\), reject \(H_{0}\). There is convincing evidence that the food choices are equally popular. (b) Because 0.0129 is less than \(\alpha=0.05\), reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the food choices are equally popular. (c) Because 0.0129 is less than \(\alpha=0.05\), reject \(H_{0}\). There is convincing evidence that the food choices are not equally popular. (d) Because 0.0129 is less than \(\alpha=0.05,\) fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is not convincing evidence that the food choices are equally popular. (e) Because 0.0129 is less than \(\alpha=0.05\), fail to reject \(H_{0}\). There is convincing evidence that the food choices are equally popular.

Refer to the following setting. Do students who read more books for pleasure tend to earn higher grades in English? The boxplots below show data from a simple random sample of 79 students at a large high school. Students were classified as light readers if they read fewer than 3 books for pleasure per year. Otherwise, they were classified as heavy readers. Each student's average English grade for the previous two marking periods was converted to a GPA scale where \(A+=4.3\), \(A=4.0, A-=3.7, B+=3.3,\) and so on. Reading and grades (10.2) Summary statistics for the two groups from Minitab are provided below. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Type of reader }\quad\mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ \text {Heavy}\quad47 & 3.640 & 0.324 & 0.047 \\ \text {Light}\quad 32 & 3.356 & 0.380 & 0.067 \end{array} $$ (a) Explain why it is acceptable to use two-sample \(t\) procedures in this setting. (b) Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean English grade for light and heavy readers. (c) Does the interval in part (b) provide convincing evidence that reading more causes a difference in students' English grades? Justify your answer.

Refer to the following setting. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health interviewed a random sample of 4877 teens (grades 7 to 12 ). One question asked was "What do you think are the chances you will be married in the next ten years?" Here is a two-way table of the responses by gender: \({ }^{28}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Female } & \text { Male } \\ \text { Almost no chance } & 119 & 103 \\ \text { Some chance, but probably not } & 150 & 171 \\ \text { A 50-50 chance } & 447 & 512 \\ \text { A good chance } & 735 & 710 \\ \text { Almost certain } & 1174 & 756 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) A Type I error is possible. (b) A Type II error is possible. (c) Both a Type I and a Type II error are possible. (d) There is no chance of making a Type I or Type II error because the \(P\) -value is approximately \(0 .\) (e) There is no chance of making a Type I or Type II error because the calculations are correct. For these data, \(\chi^{2}=69.8\) with a \(P\) -value of approximately \(0 .\) Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(0.05,\) which of the following is true?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.