/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 Refer to the following setting. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to the following setting. Do students who read more books for pleasure tend to earn higher grades in English? The boxplots below show data from a simple random sample of 79 students at a large high school. Students were classified as light readers if they read fewer than 3 books for pleasure per year. Otherwise, they were classified as heavy readers. Each student's average English grade for the previous two marking periods was converted to a GPA scale where \(A+=4.3\), \(A=4.0, A-=3.7, B+=3.3,\) and so on. Reading and grades (10.2) Summary statistics for the two groups from Minitab are provided below. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \text { Type of reader }\quad\mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } & \text { SE Mean } \\ \text {Heavy}\quad47 & 3.640 & 0.324 & 0.047 \\ \text {Light}\quad 32 & 3.356 & 0.380 & 0.067 \end{array} $$ (a) Explain why it is acceptable to use two-sample \(t\) procedures in this setting. (b) Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean English grade for light and heavy readers. (c) Does the interval in part (b) provide convincing evidence that reading more causes a difference in students' English grades? Justify your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Two-sample t-procedures are suitable due to large sample size and normality assumption. (b) 95% CI is (0.120, 0.448). (c) The interval suggests association, not causation.

Step by step solution

01

Justifying the Use of Two-Sample t-Procedure

In this context, we are comparing the means of two independent groups, heavy and light readers. The two-sample t-procedure is appropriate because the sample sizes (47 for heavy readers and 32 for light readers) are each above 30, which allows us to assume the sampling distribution of the sample mean differences is approximately normal due to the Central Limit Theorem. Additionally, the summary statistics (means, standard deviations) are given, and we assume independent random samples from the given large population of students.
02

Calculating the 95% Confidence Interval

First, we calculate the standard error for the difference between the two means using the formula: \[ SE = \sqrt{\left( \frac{S_1^2}{n_1} \right) + \left( \frac{S_2^2}{n_2} \right)} \]Given values: - Heavy readers: \(S_1 = 0.324, n_1 = 47\)- Light readers: \(S_2 = 0.380, n_2 = 32\)Substitute the values:\[ SE = \sqrt{\left( \frac{0.324^2}{47} \right) + \left( \frac{0.380^2}{32} \right)} = \sqrt{0.002233 + 0.004512} = \sqrt{0.006745} \approx 0.082 \]Next, calculate the difference in means:\[ \Delta \bar{x} = \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 = 3.640 - 3.356 = 0.284 \]Using a standard t-distribution for 95% confidence (critical value \(t^*\) roughly 2, because \(df \approx 60\)), the confidence interval is:\[ CI = \Delta \bar{x} \pm t^* \times SE = 0.284 \pm 2 \times 0.082 \approx (0.120, 0.448) \]
03

Interpretation of the Confidence Interval

The calculated 95% confidence interval (0.120, 0.448) suggests that we are 95% confident that the true mean difference in GPA between heavy readers and light readers falls between 0.120 and 0.448. This range indicates that on average, heavy readers have a higher GPA than light readers.
04

Evaluating Causation

Although the confidence interval indicates a higher GPA for heavy readers compared to light readers, this does not prove causation; it only shows an association. The study's observational nature and the lack of random assignment prevent establishing causality. Confounding variables might also influence both reading habits and academic performance, so the results do not provide convincing evidence that reading more causes a difference in grades.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values that estimates an unknown population parameter. In this exercise, we are estimating the difference in the mean English GPAs between two groups of students: heavy and light readers.
The 95% confidence interval, for instance, is calculated as the sample mean difference plus or minus the margin of error. This interval helps us understand the reliability of our sample data. It tells us, in 95 out of 100 similar samples, the true mean difference would fall within this range.
For this exercise, the calculated 95% confidence interval is (0.120, 0.448). This means we are 95% confident that the true difference in mean GPAs between heavy and light readers lies within this interval. A positive interval suggests that heavy readers tend to have a higher GPA than light readers.
Sampling Distribution
Understanding sampling distribution is crucial when performing hypothesis tests or constructing confidence intervals. It refers to the distribution of sample statistics—such as the mean—in a large number of samples taken from the same population.
In the case of our exercise, the sampling distribution of the sample mean differences can be assumed to be approximately normal. This is achieved through the Central Limit Theorem, which allows us to make such an assumption as long as the sample sizes are sufficiently large, typically above 30.
The mean of the sampling distribution equals the mean difference between heavy and light readers' GPAs, while its standard deviation is called the standard error. This forms the basis for calculating our confidence interval.
Central Limit Theorem
The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is a fundamental principle in statistics. It states that when you have a sufficiently large sample size, the distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normal, regardless of the shape of the population distribution.
In this exercise, it supports the use of the two-sample t-procedure. By having more than 30 students in both reader categories (47 heavy and 32 light), we can assume the sampling distribution of the difference in means is approximately normal.
This normality assumption is essential when computing confidence intervals or conducting hypothesis tests. It allows statisticians to use the t-distribution, which adjusts for small sample sizes, to make inferences about larger populations.
GPA Comparison
Comparing GPAs between different groups requires careful analysis. In this exercise, we aim to determine whether heavy readers have different average GPAs than light readers.
The comparison is conducted using the difference in average GPAs alongside its confidence interval. The significant positive difference in the calculated interval (0.120, 0.448) suggests that heavy readers, on average, have higher GPAs compared to light readers.
However, while the confidence interval suggests a difference, it does not prove that increased reading causes higher GPAs. This is because of potential confounding variables and the nature of the data, which is observational rather than experimental. Thus, we conclude that while more reading is associated with higher GPAs, causation cannot be inferred.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aw, nuts! A company claims that each batch of its deluxe mixed nuts contains \(52 \%\) cashews, \(27 \%\) almonds, \(13 \%\) macadamia nuts, and \(8 \%\) brazil nuts. To test this claim, a quality-control inspector takes a random sample of 150 nuts from the latest batch. The one-way table below displays the sample data. $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \text { Nut: } & \text { Cashew } & \text { Almond } & \text { Macadamia } & \text { Brazil } \\ \text { Count: } & 83 & 29 & 20 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) State appropriate hypotheses for performing a test of the company's claim. (b) Calculate the expected counts for each type of nut. Show your work.

Python eggs How is the hatching of water python eggs influenced by the temperature of the snake's nest? Researchers randomly assigned newly laid eggs to one of three water temperatures: hot, neutral, or cold. Hot duplicates the extra warmth provided by the mother python, and cold duplicates the absence of the mother. Here are the data on the number of eggs that hatched and didn't hatch: \({ }^{15}\) $$ \begin{array}{lccc} {\text {Water Temperature }} \\ \text { Hatched? } & \text { Cold } & \text { Neutral } & \text { Hot } \\ \text { Yes } & 16 & 38 & 75 \\ \text { No } & 11 & 18 & 29 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Compare the distributions of hatching status for the three treatments. (b) Are the differences between the three groups statistically significant? Give appropriate evidence to support your answer.

Housing According to the Census Bureau, the distribution by ethnic background of the New York City population in a recent year was Hispanic: \(28 \%\) Black: \(24 \% \quad\) White: \(35 \%\) Asian: \(12 \%\) Others: \(1 \%\) The manager of a large housing complex in the city wonders whether the distribution by race of the complex's residents is consistent with the population distribution. To find out, she records data from a random sample of 800 residents. The table below displays the sample data. \({ }^{4}\) $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline \text { Race: } & \text { Hispanic } & \text { Black } & \text { White } & \text { Asian } & \text { 0ther } \\ \text { Count: } & 212 & 202 & 270 & 94 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Are these data significantly different from the city's distribution by race? Carry out an appropriate test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level to support your answer. If you find a significant result, perform a follow-up analysis.

Refer to the following setting. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health interviewed a random sample of 4877 teens (grades 7 to 12 ). One question asked was "What do you think are the chances you will be married in the next ten years?" Here is a two-way table of the responses by gender: \({ }^{28}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Female } & \text { Male } \\ \text { Almost no chance } & 119 & 103 \\ \text { Some chance, but probably not } & 150 & 171 \\ \text { A 50-50 chance } & 447 & 512 \\ \text { A good chance } & 735 & 710 \\ \text { Almost certain } & 1174 & 756 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The degrees of freedom for the chi-square test for this two-way table are (a) 4 . (c) 10 (e) 4876 . (b) 8 . (d) 20

Preventing strokes Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anticlotting drug named dipyridamole would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes during the two years of the study: \(^{20}\). $$ \begin{array}{llcc} \hline \text { Group } & \text { Treatment } & \text { Number of patients } & \text { Number of strokes } \\ 1 & \text { Placebo } & 1649 & 250 \\ 2 & \text { Aspirin } & 1649 & 206 \\ 3 & \text { Dipyridamole } & 1654 & 211 \\ 4 & \text { Both } & 1650 & 157 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Summarize these data in a two-way table. Then compare the stroke rates for the four treatments. (b) Explain in words what the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}=p_{3}=p_{4}\) says about the incidence of strokes. (c) Do the data provide convincing evidence of a difference in the effectiveness of the four treatments at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.