/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Housing According to the Census ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Housing According to the Census Bureau, the distribution by ethnic background of the New York City population in a recent year was Hispanic: \(28 \%\) Black: \(24 \% \quad\) White: \(35 \%\) Asian: \(12 \%\) Others: \(1 \%\) The manager of a large housing complex in the city wonders whether the distribution by race of the complex's residents is consistent with the population distribution. To find out, she records data from a random sample of 800 residents. The table below displays the sample data. \({ }^{4}\) $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline \text { Race: } & \text { Hispanic } & \text { Black } & \text { White } & \text { Asian } & \text { 0ther } \\ \text { Count: } & 212 & 202 & 270 & 94 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Are these data significantly different from the city's distribution by race? Carry out an appropriate test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level to support your answer. If you find a significant result, perform a follow-up analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis; the distributions are significantly different.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

We begin by defining our null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the distribution of residents by race in the housing complex is consistent with that of the New York City population. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) claims that the distribution is not consistent with the city's population distribution.
02

Determine Expected Counts

Using the city's population percentages, calculate the expected counts for each ethnic group based on the sample size of 800 residents. - Hispanic: \(0.28 \times 800 = 224\)- Black: \(0.24 \times 800 = 192\)- White: \(0.35 \times 800 = 280\)- Asian: \(0.12 \times 800 = 96\)- Other: \(0.01 \times 800 = 8\)
03

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic

Use the observed and expected values to compute the chi-square statistic, \(\chi^2\), using the formula: \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \]- Hispanic: \(\frac{(212 - 224)^2}{224} \approx 0.64\)- Black: \(\frac{(202 - 192)^2}{192} \approx 0.52\)- White: \(\frac{(270 - 280)^2}{280} \approx 0.36\)- Asian: \(\frac{(94 - 96)^2}{96} \approx 0.04\)- Other: \(\frac{(22 - 8)^2}{8} \approx 24.5\)Adding these gives \(\chi^2 \approx 26.06\).
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Critical Value

The degrees of freedom \(df\) for the chi-square test is equal to the number of categories minus one: \[ df = 5 - 1 = 4 \]Using a chi-square table or calculator at \(\alpha = 0.05\), the critical value for \(df = 4\) is approximately 9.488.
05

Compare and Conclude

Since the calculated chi-square statistic \(26.06\) is greater than the critical value \(9.488\), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that the distribution of residents by race in the housing complex is significantly different from that of the New York City population.
06

Perform Follow-up Analysis

The large contribution to the chi-square statistic from the 'Other' category indicates this is a key area of difference between the observed and expected distributions. This suggests a disparity in residency distribution predominantly due to the 'Other' category's presence in the housing complex compared to the city.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Counts
In statistics, when dealing with observed data, it's crucial to determine what the expected frequencies are if the null hypothesis is true. Expected counts provide a baseline that allows comparison against actual observations. In our scenario with the New York City population data, expected counts are the number of each race you would expect to find in the housing complex, based on the city's distribution percentages.

To calculate these expected counts, you multiply the total number of sampled residents (800 in this case) by the percentage of each ethnic group in the city population. For instance, for the Hispanic population, the expected count is calculated as: \[ 0.28 \times 800 = 224 \]

Each ethnic group is treated similarly, enabling a clear measure against which to compare the actual counts from the sample. This, in turn, helps in calculating the chi-square statistic, which assesses whether deviations from expected counts are due to chance or represent a significant difference.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis used to make inferences about populations. We start by stating two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), assumes no effect or no difference in the situation being studied. In this exercise, the null hypothesis states that the ethnic distribution in the housing complex is the same as that observed in New York City's overall population.
  • \( H_0 \): The distribution by race in the housing complex is consistent with the city's distribution.
The alternative hypothesis, or \( H_a \), suggests there is a difference or effect that is not due to random chance.
  • \( H_a \): The distribution by race in the housing complex is different from the city's distribution.
Hypothesis testing involves calculating a test statistic, here the chi-square statistic, and then comparing it to a critical value to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It's a powerful method to validate if observed outcomes differ significantly from what was expected under the null hypothesis.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) is a concept used in statistical tests to determine the number of independent values or quantities which can vary in an analysis without breaking any constraints. In the chi-square test for goodness of fit, the degrees of freedom are calculated by taking the total number of categories and subtracting one.

This subtraction accounts for the use of the observed data to estimate parameters, ensuring that only the truly independent pieces of information remain. For example, in our exercise with five ethnic categories (Hispanic, Black, White, Asian, Other), the degrees of freedom is:
  • \( df = 5 - 1 = 4 \)
This number is crucial when determining the critical value from the chi-square distribution table, which ultimately helps in making a decision about our hypotheses by comparing the calculated chi-square statistic.
Critical Value
The critical value in hypothesis testing is a threshold that determines the boundary for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is derived from probability distributions, based on the specified significance level \( \alpha \) and the degrees of freedom.

For a chi-square test, the critical value corresponds to the upper tail of the chi-square distribution. In our exercise, we use a significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This means there's a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none, defining our critical region for making this decision. With degrees of freedom \( df = 4 \), we refer to chi-square tables or statistical software to identify the critical value:
  • For \( df = 4 \) and \( \alpha \) of \( 0.05 \), the critical value is approximately 9.488.
If the computed chi-square statistic exceeds this critical value, as it does in our example (26.06 > 9.488), this indicates a significant difference, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis that the observed and expected distributions are the same.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You may find the inference summary chart inside the back cover helpful. Inference recap \((8.1\) to 11.2\()\) In each of the following settings, state which inference procedure from Chapter \(8,9,10,\) or 11 you would use. Be specific. For example, you might say "two-sample \(z\) test for the difference between two proportions." You do not need to carry out any procedures. \(^{30}\) (a) Is there a relationship between attendance at religious services and alcohol consumption? A random sample of 1000 adults was asked whether they regularly attend religious services and whether they drink alcohol daily. (b) Separate random samples of 75 college students and 75 high school students were asked how much time, on average, they spend watching television each week. We want to estimate the difference in the average amount of \(\mathrm{TV}\) watched by high school and college students.

Exercises 59 to 60 refer to the following setting. For their final project, a group of AP \(^{\otimes}\) Statistics students investigated the following question: "Will changing the rating scale on a survey affect how people answer the question?" To find out, the group took an SRS of 50 students from an alphabetical roster of the school's just over 1000 students. The first 22 students chosen were asked to rate the cafeteria food on a scale of 1 (terrible) to 5 (excellent). The remaining 28 students were asked to rate the cafeteria food on a scale of 0 (terrible) to 4 (excellent). Here are the data: $$ \begin{array}{lcccrc} &{1 \text { to 5 scale }} \\ \text { Rating } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \text { Frequency } & 2 & 3 & 1 & 13 & 3 \\ \hline & {0 \text { to 4 scale }} \\ \text { Rating } & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \text { Frequency } & 0 & 0 & 2 & 18 & 8 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Average ratings (1.3,10.2) The students decided to compare the average ratings of the cafeteria food on the two scales. (a) Find the mean and standard deviation of the ratings for the students who were given the 1 -to- 5 scale. (b) For the students who were given the 0 -to- 4 scale, the ratings have a mean of 3.21 and a standard deviation of \(0.568 .\) Since the scales differ by one point, the group decided to add 1 to each of these ratings. What are the mean and standard deviation of the adjusted ratings? (c) Would it be appropriate to compare the means from parts (a) and (b) using a two-sample \(t\) test? Justify your answer.

Skittles Statistics teacher Jason Molesky contacted Mars, Inc., to ask about the color distribution for Skittles candies. Here is an excerpt from the response he received: "The original flavor blend for the SKITTLES BITE SIZE CANDIES is lemon, lime, orange, strawberry and grape. They were chosen as a result of consumer preference tests we conducted. The flavor blend is 20 percent of each flavor." (a) State appropriate hypotheses for a significance test of the company's claim. (b) Find the expected counts for a bag of Skittles with 60 candies. (c) How large a \(\chi^{2}\) statistic would you need to have significant evidence against the company's claim at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level? At the \(\alpha=0.01\) level? (d) Create a set of observed counts for a bag with 60 candies that gives a \(P\) -value between 0.01 and \(0.05 .\) Show the calculation of your chi-square statistic.

Benford's law Faked numbers in tax returns, invoices, or expense account claims often display patterns that aren't present in legitimate records. Some patterns are obvious and easily avoided by a clever crook. Others are more subtle. It is a striking fact that the first digits of numbers in legitimate records often follow a model known as Benford's law. \({ }^{3}\) Call the first digit of a randomly chosen record \(X\) for short. Benford's law gives this probability model for \(X\) (note that a first digit can't be 0 ): $$ \begin{array}{lccccccccc} \hline \text { First digit: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \text { Probability: } & 0.301 & 0.176 & 0.125 & 0.097 & 0.079 & 0.067 & 0.058 & 0.051 & 0.046 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ A forensic accountant who is familiar with Benford's law inspects a random sample of 250 invoices from a company that is accused of committing fraud. The table below displays the sample data. $$ \begin{array}{lcrrrrrrrr} \hline \text { First digit: } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 \\ \text { Count: } & 61 & 50 & 43 & 34 & 25 & 16 & 7 & 8 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Are these data inconsistent with Benford's law? Carry out an appropriate test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level to support your answer. If you find a significant result, perform a follow-up analysis. (b) Describe a Type I error and a Type II error in this setting, and give a possible consequence of each. Which do you think is more serious?

Students and catalog shopping What is the most important reason that students buy from catalogs? The answer may differ for different groups of students. Here are results for separate random samples of American and Asian students at a large midwestern university: \(^{26}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { American } & \text { Asian } \\ \text { Save time } & 29 & 10 \\ \text { Easy } & 28 & 11 \\ \text { Low price } & 17 & 34 \\ \text { Live far from stores } & 11 & 4 \\ \text { No pressure to buy } & 10 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Should we use a chi-square test for homogeneity or a chi-square test for independence in this setting? Justify your answer. (b) State appropriate hypotheses for performing the type of test you chose in part (a). (c) Check that the conditions for carrying out the test are met. (d) Interpret the \(P\) -value in context. What conclusion would you draw?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.