/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Housing According to the Census ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Housing According to the Census Bureau, the distribution by ethnic background of the New York City population in a recent year was Hispanic: \(28 \%\) Black: \(24 \% \quad\) White: \(35 \%\) Asian: \(12 \%\) Others: \(1 \%\) The manager of a large housing complex in the city wonders whether the distribution by race of the complex's residents is consistent with the population distribution. To find out, she records data from a random sample of 800 residents. The table below displays the sample data. \({ }^{4}\) $$ \begin{array}{lccccc} \hline \text { Race: } & \text { Hispanic } & \text { Black } & \text { White } & \text { Asian } & \text { 0ther } \\ \text { Count: } & 212 & 202 & 270 & 94 & 22 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Are these data significantly different from the city's distribution by race? Carry out an appropriate test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level to support your answer. If you find a significant result, perform a follow-up analysis.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis; the distributions are significantly different.

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

We begin by defining our null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the distribution of residents by race in the housing complex is consistent with that of the New York City population. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) claims that the distribution is not consistent with the city's population distribution.
02

Determine Expected Counts

Using the city's population percentages, calculate the expected counts for each ethnic group based on the sample size of 800 residents. - Hispanic: \(0.28 \times 800 = 224\)- Black: \(0.24 \times 800 = 192\)- White: \(0.35 \times 800 = 280\)- Asian: \(0.12 \times 800 = 96\)- Other: \(0.01 \times 800 = 8\)
03

Calculate Chi-Square Statistic

Use the observed and expected values to compute the chi-square statistic, \(\chi^2\), using the formula: \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i} \]- Hispanic: \(\frac{(212 - 224)^2}{224} \approx 0.64\)- Black: \(\frac{(202 - 192)^2}{192} \approx 0.52\)- White: \(\frac{(270 - 280)^2}{280} \approx 0.36\)- Asian: \(\frac{(94 - 96)^2}{96} \approx 0.04\)- Other: \(\frac{(22 - 8)^2}{8} \approx 24.5\)Adding these gives \(\chi^2 \approx 26.06\).
04

Determine Degrees of Freedom and Critical Value

The degrees of freedom \(df\) for the chi-square test is equal to the number of categories minus one: \[ df = 5 - 1 = 4 \]Using a chi-square table or calculator at \(\alpha = 0.05\), the critical value for \(df = 4\) is approximately 9.488.
05

Compare and Conclude

Since the calculated chi-square statistic \(26.06\) is greater than the critical value \(9.488\), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that the distribution of residents by race in the housing complex is significantly different from that of the New York City population.
06

Perform Follow-up Analysis

The large contribution to the chi-square statistic from the 'Other' category indicates this is a key area of difference between the observed and expected distributions. This suggests a disparity in residency distribution predominantly due to the 'Other' category's presence in the housing complex compared to the city.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Expected Counts
In statistics, when dealing with observed data, it's crucial to determine what the expected frequencies are if the null hypothesis is true. Expected counts provide a baseline that allows comparison against actual observations. In our scenario with the New York City population data, expected counts are the number of each race you would expect to find in the housing complex, based on the city's distribution percentages.

To calculate these expected counts, you multiply the total number of sampled residents (800 in this case) by the percentage of each ethnic group in the city population. For instance, for the Hispanic population, the expected count is calculated as: \[ 0.28 \times 800 = 224 \]

Each ethnic group is treated similarly, enabling a clear measure against which to compare the actual counts from the sample. This, in turn, helps in calculating the chi-square statistic, which assesses whether deviations from expected counts are due to chance or represent a significant difference.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis used to make inferences about populations. We start by stating two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.

The null hypothesis, denoted as \( H_0 \), assumes no effect or no difference in the situation being studied. In this exercise, the null hypothesis states that the ethnic distribution in the housing complex is the same as that observed in New York City's overall population.
  • \( H_0 \): The distribution by race in the housing complex is consistent with the city's distribution.
The alternative hypothesis, or \( H_a \), suggests there is a difference or effect that is not due to random chance.
  • \( H_a \): The distribution by race in the housing complex is different from the city's distribution.
Hypothesis testing involves calculating a test statistic, here the chi-square statistic, and then comparing it to a critical value to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It's a powerful method to validate if observed outcomes differ significantly from what was expected under the null hypothesis.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) is a concept used in statistical tests to determine the number of independent values or quantities which can vary in an analysis without breaking any constraints. In the chi-square test for goodness of fit, the degrees of freedom are calculated by taking the total number of categories and subtracting one.

This subtraction accounts for the use of the observed data to estimate parameters, ensuring that only the truly independent pieces of information remain. For example, in our exercise with five ethnic categories (Hispanic, Black, White, Asian, Other), the degrees of freedom is:
  • \( df = 5 - 1 = 4 \)
This number is crucial when determining the critical value from the chi-square distribution table, which ultimately helps in making a decision about our hypotheses by comparing the calculated chi-square statistic.
Critical Value
The critical value in hypothesis testing is a threshold that determines the boundary for deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis. It is derived from probability distributions, based on the specified significance level \( \alpha \) and the degrees of freedom.

For a chi-square test, the critical value corresponds to the upper tail of the chi-square distribution. In our exercise, we use a significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This means there's a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none, defining our critical region for making this decision. With degrees of freedom \( df = 4 \), we refer to chi-square tables or statistical software to identify the critical value:
  • For \( df = 4 \) and \( \alpha \) of \( 0.05 \), the critical value is approximately 9.488.
If the computed chi-square statistic exceeds this critical value, as it does in our example (26.06 > 9.488), this indicates a significant difference, leading to rejection of the null hypothesis that the observed and expected distributions are the same.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How to quit smoking It's hard for smokers to quit. Perhaps prescribing a drug to fight depression will work as well as the usual nicotine patch. Perhaps combining the patch and the drug will work better than either treatment alone. Here are data from a randomized, double-blind trial that compared four treatments. \({ }^{19} \mathrm{~A}\) "success" means that the subject did not smoke for a year following the beginning of the study. $$ \begin{array}{llcc} \hline \text { Group } & \text { Treatment } & \text { Subjects } & \text { Successes } \\ 1 & \text { Nicotine patch } & 244 & 40 \\ 2 & \text { Drug } & 244 & 74 \\ 3 & \text { Patch plus drug } & 245 & 87 \\ 4 & \text { Placebo } & 160 & 25 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Summarize these data in a two-way table. Then compare the success rates for the four treatments. (b) Explain in words what the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p_{1}=\) \(p_{2}=p_{3}=p_{4}\) says about subjects' smoking habits. (c) Do the data provide convincing evidence of a difference in the effectiveness of the four treatments at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level?

Refer to the following setting. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health interviewed a random sample of 4877 teens (grades 7 to 12 ). One question asked was "What do you think are the chances you will be married in the next ten years?" Here is a two-way table of the responses by gender: \({ }^{28}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { Female } & \text { Male } \\ \text { Almost no chance } & 119 & 103 \\ \text { Some chance, but probably not } & 150 & 171 \\ \text { A 50-50 chance } & 447 & 512 \\ \text { A good chance } & 735 & 710 \\ \text { Almost certain } & 1174 & 756 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) A Type I error is possible. (b) A Type II error is possible. (c) Both a Type I and a Type II error are possible. (d) There is no chance of making a Type I or Type II error because the \(P\) -value is approximately \(0 .\) (e) There is no chance of making a Type I or Type II error because the calculations are correct. For these data, \(\chi^{2}=69.8\) with a \(P\) -value of approximately \(0 .\) Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(0.05,\) which of the following is true?

Refer to the following setting. The manager of a high school cafeteria is planning to offer several new types of food for student lunches in the following school year. She wants to know if each type of food will be equally popular so she can start ordering supplies and making other plans. To find out, she selects a random sample of 100 students and asks them, "Which type of food do you prefer: Asian food, Mexican food, pizza, or hamburgers?" Here are her data: $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \text { Type of Food: } & \text { Asian } & \text { Mexican } & \text { Pizza } & \text { Hamburgers } \\ \text { Count: } & 18 & 22 & 39 & 21 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) \(\frac{(18-25)^{2}}{25}+\frac{(22-25)^{2}}{25}+\frac{(39-25)^{2}}{25}+\frac{(21-25)^{2}}{25}\) (b) \(\frac{(25-18)^{2}}{18}+\frac{(25-22)^{2}}{22}+\frac{(25-39)^{2}}{39}+\frac{(25-21)^{2}}{21}\) (c) \(\frac{(18-25)}{25}+\frac{(22-25)}{25}+\frac{(39-25)}{25}+\frac{(21-25)}{25}\) (d) \(\frac{(18-25)^{2}}{100}+\frac{(22-25)^{2}}{100}+\frac{(39-25)^{2}}{100}+\frac{(21-25)^{2}}{100}\) (e) \(\frac{(0.18-0.25)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{(0.22-0.25)^{2}}{0.25}+\frac{(0.39-0.25)^{2}}{0.25}\) \(+\frac{(0.21-0.25)^{2}}{0.25}\) The chi-square statistic is

Mendel and the peas Gregor Mendel \((1822-1884)\) an Austrian monk, is considered the father of genetics. Mendel studied the inheritance of various traits in pea plants. One such trait is whether the pea is smooth or wrinkled. Mendel predicted a ratio of 3 smooth peas for every 1 wrinkled pea. In one experiment, he observed 423 smooth and 133 wrinkled peas. Assume that the conditions for inference were met. Carry out an appropriate test of the genetic model that Mendel predicted. What do you conclude?

Skittles Statistics teacher Jason Molesky contacted Mars, Inc., to ask about the color distribution for Skittles candies. Here is an excerpt from the response he received: "The original flavor blend for the SKITTLES BITE SIZE CANDIES is lemon, lime, orange, strawberry and grape. They were chosen as a result of consumer preference tests we conducted. The flavor blend is 20 percent of each flavor." (a) State appropriate hypotheses for a significance test of the company's claim. (b) Find the expected counts for a bag of Skittles with 60 candies. (c) How large a \(\chi^{2}\) statistic would you need to have significant evidence against the company's claim at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level? At the \(\alpha=0.01\) level? (d) Create a set of observed counts for a bag with 60 candies that gives a \(P\) -value between 0.01 and \(0.05 .\) Show the calculation of your chi-square statistic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.